Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Force representation

Fracture t es are of interest in fracture mechanics in nnderstanding and classifying the way a material fails. Different terms are nsed to describe the cracking behavior. In the following section the terms opening crack and mode F are S5mon5mous, as well as mode II and mode III for shear cracks, with forces parallel to the crack (in-plane shear) or forces perpendicular to the crack (out-of-plane shear). In seismology, shear dislocations are described by a double couple (DC) source because the DC force representation allows simplification of some mathematics - this is explained later in more detail (see chapter 5.6.3). [Pg.77]

In a separation process, ion exchange resin particles are generally used in a column. A complex time-dependent differential equation for mass balance in the column has to be combined with the diffusion flux expression for a resin particle, and other appropriate boundary and initial conditions, to determine the extent of separation. It is obvious from the preceding few paragraphs that the diffusion flux expressions are difficult to handle for resin particles. For ion exchange column analysis, practical approaches therefore utilize a linear-driving-force representation of the mass flux to a resin particle (Helfferich, 1962 Vermeulen et ai, 1973) this leads to the use of mass-transfer coefficients in resin particle flux expressions. [Pg.169]

Fukao Y (1995) Single-force representation of earthquakes due to landslides or the collapse of caverns. Geophys J Int 122(l) 243-248... [Pg.2393]

Dalgarno A and Lewis J T 1956 The representation of long-range forces by series expansions. I. The divergence of the series Proc. Phys. Soc. A 69 57... [Pg.210]

Figure Bl.20.9. Schematic representation of DLVO-type forces measured between two mica surfaces in aqueous solutions of KNO3 or KCl at various concentrations. The inset reveals the existence of oscillatory and monotonic structural forces, of which the latter clearly depend on the salt concentration. Reproduced with pennission from [94]. Figure Bl.20.9. Schematic representation of DLVO-type forces measured between two mica surfaces in aqueous solutions of KNO3 or KCl at various concentrations. The inset reveals the existence of oscillatory and monotonic structural forces, of which the latter clearly depend on the salt concentration. Reproduced with pennission from [94].
Quantum chemical methods, exemplified by CASSCF and other MCSCF methods, have now evolved to an extent where it is possible to routinely treat accurately the excited electronic states of molecules containing a number of atoms. Mixed nuclear dynamics, such as swarm of trajectory based surface hopping or Ehrenfest dynamics, or the Gaussian wavepacket based multiple spawning method, use an approximate representation of the nuclear wavepacket based on classical trajectories. They are thus able to use the infoiination from quantum chemistry calculations required for the propagation of the nuclei in the form of forces. These methods seem able to reproduce, at least qualitatively, the dynamics of non-adiabatic systems. Test calculations have now been run using duect dynamics, and these show that even a small number of trajectories is able to produce useful mechanistic infomiation about the photochemistry of a system. In some cases it is even possible to extract some quantitative information. [Pg.311]

The stochastic differential equation and the second moment of the random force are insufficient to determine which calculus is to be preferred. The two calculus correspond to different physical models [11,12]. It is beyond the scope of the present article to describe the difference in details. We only note that the Ito calculus consider r t) to be a function of the edge of the interval while the Stratonovich calculus takes an average value. Hence, in the Ito calculus using a discrete representation rf t) becomes r] tn) i]n — y n — A i) -I- j At. Developing the determinant of the Jacobian -... [Pg.267]

Z-matriccs arc commonly used as input to quantum mechanical ab initio and serai-empirical) calculations as they properly describe the spatial arrangement of the atoms of a molecule. Note that there is no explicit information on the connectivity present in the Z-matrix, as there is, c.g., in a connection table, but quantum mechanics derives the bonding and non-bonding intramolecular interactions from the molecular electronic wavefunction, starting from atomic wavefiinctions and a crude 3D structure. In contrast to that, most of the molecular mechanics packages require the initial molecular geometry as 3D Cartesian coordinates plus the connection table, as they have to assign appropriate force constants and potentials to each atom and each bond in order to relax and optimi-/e the molecular structure. Furthermore, Cartesian coordinates are preferable to internal coordinates if the spatial situations of ensembles of different molecules have to be compared. Of course, both representations are interconvertible. [Pg.94]

In order to represent 3D molecular models it is necessary to supply structure files with 3D information (e.g., pdb, xyz, df, mol, etc.. If structures from a structure editor are used directly, the files do not normally include 3D data. Indusion of such data can be achieved only via 3D structure generators, force-field calculations, etc. 3D structures can then be represented in various display modes, e.g., wire frame, balls and sticks, space-filling (see Section 2.11). Proteins are visualized by various representations of helices, / -strains, or tertiary structures. An additional feature is the ability to color the atoms according to subunits, temperature, or chain types. During all such operations the molecule can be interactively moved, rotated, or zoomed by the user. [Pg.146]

SymApps converts 2D structures From the ChemWindow drawing program into 3D representations with the help of a modified MM2 force field (see Section 7.2). Besides basic visualization tools such as display styles, perspective views, and light source adjustments, the module additionally provides calculations of bond lengths, angles, etc, Moreover, point groups and character tables can be determined. Animations of spinning movements and symmetry operations can also he created and saved as movie files (. avi). [Pg.147]

The OPLS force field is described in twtt papers, one discussing parameters for proteins W. L. Jorgensen and J. Tirado-Rives,/. Amer. (. hem. Soc., 110, 1557 (iy8K) and on e discii ssin g param eters for n iicleotide bases [J. Pranata, S. Wiersch ke, and W. L. Jorgen sen. , /.. Amer. Chem. Soc.. 117, 281(1 ( 1991)1. The force field uses the united atom concept ftir many, but not all. hydrttgens attached to carbons to allow faster calculation s on macromolecular systems. The amino and nucleic acid residue templates in HyperChein automatically switch to a united atom representation where appropriate when th e OPLS option is selected. [Pg.192]

United Atom Force Fields and Reduced Representations... [Pg.239]

Halgren T A 1992. Representation of van der Waals (vdW) Interactions in Molecular Mechanics Force Fields Potential Form, Combination Rules, and vdW Parameters. Journal of the American Chemical Society 114 7827-7843. [Pg.267]

The first molecular dynamics simulations of a lipid bilayer which used an explicit representation of all the molecules was performed by van der Ploeg and Berendsen in 1982 [van dei Ploeg and Berendsen 1982]. Their simulation contained 32 decanoate molecules arranged in two layers of sixteen molecules each. Periodic boundary conditions were employed and a xmited atom force potential was used to model the interactions. The head groups were restrained using a harmonic potential of the form ... [Pg.415]

MMl, MM2, MM3, and MM4 are general-purpose organic force fields. There have been many variants of the original methods, particularly MM2. MMl is seldom used since the newer versions show measurable improvements. The MM3 method is probably one of the most accurate ways of modeling hydrocarbons. At the time of this book s publication, the MM4 method was still too new to allow any broad generalization about the results. However, the initial published results are encouraging. These are some of the most widely used force fields due to the accuracy of representation of organic molecules. MMX and MM+ are variations on MM2. These force fields use five to six valence terms, one of which is an electrostatic term and one to nine cross terms. [Pg.55]

YETI is a force held designed for the accurate representation of nonbonded interactions. It is most often used for modeling interactions between biomolecules and small substrate molecules. It is not designed for molecular geometry optimization so researchers often optimize the molecular geometry with some other force held, such as AMBER, then use YETI to model the docking process. Recent additions to YETI are support for metals and solvent effects. [Pg.56]

The above potential is referred to as a Lennard-Jones or 6-12 potential and is summed over all nonbonded pairs of atoms ij. The first positive term is the short range repulsion and the second negative term is the long range attraction. The parameters of the interaction are Aj and B... The convenient analytical form of the 6-12 potential means that it is often used, although an exponential repulsion term is usually considered to be a more accurate representation of the repulsive forces (as used in MM-t). [Pg.176]

Figure 2.7 shows a representation of this situation. The ordinate is an energy axis and the abscissa is called the reaction coordinate and represents the progress of the elementary step. In moving from P to H, the particle simply moves from one equilibrium position to another. In the absence of any external forces, the energy of both the initial and final locations should be the same as shown by the solid line in Fig. 2.7. Between the two minima corresponding to the initial and final positions is the energy barrier arising from the dislodging of the particles neighboring the reaction path from their positions of minimum energy. Figure 2.7 shows a representation of this situation. The ordinate is an energy axis and the abscissa is called the reaction coordinate and represents the progress of the elementary step. In moving from P to H, the particle simply moves from one equilibrium position to another. In the absence of any external forces, the energy of both the initial and final locations should be the same as shown by the solid line in Fig. 2.7. Between the two minima corresponding to the initial and final positions is the energy barrier arising from the dislodging of the particles neighboring the reaction path from their positions of minimum energy.
Figure 2.1 served as the basis for our initial analysis of viscosity, and we return to this representation now with the stipulation that the volume of fluid sandwiched between the two plates is a unit of volume. This unit is defined by a unit of contact area with the walls and a unit of separation between the two walls. Next we consider a shearing force acting on this cube of fluid to induce a unit velocity gradient. According to Eq. (2.6), the rate of energy dissipation per unit volume from viscous forces dW/dt is proportional to the square of the velocity gradient, with t]q (pure liquid, subscript 0) the factor of proportionality ... [Pg.587]

The above representation for the shell energy contains three different terms describing the bending energy of the shell, the deformation energy of the middle surface, and the work done by the exterior force /, respectively. [Pg.139]


See other pages where Force representation is mentioned: [Pg.299]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.1094]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.81]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.482 ]




SEARCH



Force united atom representations

Force-field representations

Media representation of forced migration

United Atom Force Fields and Reduced Representations

Valence-bond representation forces

© 2024 chempedia.info