Forbidden reaction, definition

Although such a definition is seemingly quite clear and unique, the practical exploitation of the above criterion is complicated by the fact that the scission and formation of bonds is a microscopic process, inaccessible to direct experimental observation. This, of course, suggests the necessity of searching other, more easily exploitable, criteria of concert. One such criterion is the remarkable stereospecificity accompanying the formation of products in allowed pericyclic reactions [60,61]. The fact that the origin of the synchronisation in the process of scission and the formation of the bonds was always intuitively related to a certain energetic stabilisation led to another widespread opinion that all allowed reactions are automatically concerted. On the other hand nonconcertedness, advocated by frequently observed stereo-randomization [60] was practically always expected in forbidden reactions. 

The principle of photocatalysis is often explained with an illustration like Fig. 2, a schematic representation of the electronic structures of semiconducting materials, a band model. An electron in an electron-filled valence band (VB) is excited by photoirradiation to a vacant conduction band (CB), which is separated by a forbidden band, a band gap, from the VB, leaving a positive hole in the VB (Section III.B). These electrons and positive holes drive reduction and oxidation, respectively, of compounds adsorbed on the surface of a photocatalyst. Such an interpretation accounts for the photocatalytic reactions of semiconducting and insulating materials absorbing photons by the bulk of materials. In the definition of photocatalysis given above, however, no such limitation based on the electronic structure of a photocatalyst is included. For example, isolated... 

The concepts discussed regarding the symmetry restrictions and their removal can be described in a number of ways. Complete correlation diagrams can be constructed and the forbiddenness illustrated by sharp orbital crossings 20). Although definitive, this approach would not as clearly illustrate the nature of the restraints to reaction. 

One of the crucial points in the recent developments of coordination compound photochemistry has been the debate concerning the identity of the excited state(s) responsible for the photosolvation reactions that are obtained by irradiating Cr(III) complexes in their ligand field bands (5,8), Direct photolysis experiments revealed that the most likely candidates (see e.g,. Figures 2 and 3) are the lowest spin-allowed excited state ( T2ff in octahedral symmetry) and the lowest spin-forbidden excited state ( Eg). Such experiments, however, did not warrant any definite conclusion about the actual role of each of these two states (5). 

The other definition is due to Hashimoto [164] who define the same reference in the form formally similar to the one derived from one-determinantal wave fimction. The similarity index (116) was then applied to a series of selected pericyclic reactions (both forbidden and allowed) and its variation with the systematic variation of the reaction coordinate q> for both types of reference standard is discussed in the study [165]. Since all the details of this discussion can again be found in this stud we remind here only the most important results. They concern, above all, the form of the dependence g(cp) vs. 9. An example of such a dependence, for the case of simple 2+2 ethene dimerization, is given in Fig. 14, but practically the same type of dependence is observed for remaining reactions as well. Also the change of the reference standard has only negligible effect and the most important difference between the Kutzelnigg s and Hashimoto s type of reference standard is the systematic vertical shift of the curves conditioned by the evident change in the values of similarity indices for 9 = 0 and 9 = ti/2 (117). 

After reactions (2), (3) and (4) the products are subject to the same choices so that definition of the relative reaction velocities of any stages by study of complete systems is doomed to failure. In addition, reaction (5) may remove the substrate completely or partially. Nevertheless, sufficient data have now been accumulated to allow one to make some proposals as to forbidden and acceptable conversions. 

With these descriptors in hand, we can look at the generalized orbital symmetry rule. There is a definite binary nature to the theory of pericyclic reactions. For cycloadditions, [2-f2] is forbidden (all suprafacial), whereas [4-F2] is allowed (all suprafacial). Continuing with the series, [6+2] is forbidden, and [8+2] is allowed. We will also encounter patterns in the other kinds of pericyclic reactions presented electrocyclic reactions, sigmatropic shifts, etc. Based on patterns such as these. Woodward and Hoffmann proposed the following rule for all pericyclic reactions ... 

When Woodward and Hoffmann developed the conservation of orbital symmetry, they introduced the terms "allowed" and "forbidden" to describe reactions such as the [4+2] and [2+2] cycloadditions, respectively. This terminology caught on, and has become fairly standard in the field. With the benefit of a historical perspective, though, we can now see that these terms are too definitive. 

While photocycloadditions are typically not concerted, pericyclic processes, our analysis of the thermal [2+2] reaction from Chapter 15 is instructive. Recall that suprafacial-suprafacial [2+2] cycloaddition reactions are thermally forbidden. Such reactions typically lead to an avoided crossing in the state correlation diagram, and that presents a perfect situation for funnel formation. This can be seen in Figure 16.17, where a portion of Figure 15.4 is reproduced using the symmetry and state definitions explained in detail in Section 15.2.2. The barrier to the thermal process is substantial, but the first excited state has a surface that comes close to the thermal barrier. At this point a funnel will form allowing the photochemical process to proceed. It is for this reason that reactions that are thermally forbidden are often efficient photochemical processes. It is debatable, however, whether to consider the [2+2] photochemical reactions orbital symmetry "allowed". Rather, the thermal forbiddenness tends to produce energy surface features that are conducive to efficient photochemical processes. As we will see below, even systems that could react via a photochemically "allowed" concerted pathway, often choose a stepwise mechanism instead. 

We note that in the definition, the set X (disjoint with X) is composed of those atoms on which the reaction changes are forbidden. 

---