Flory-Huggins solvent-polymer

Often, the Flory-Huggins solvent-polymer interaction parameter is applied instead of 1 P or G. There are some books (Refs. 1-3) giving details for such procedures as well as extensive tables of polymer solubility parameters from which the table below is extracted. Methods for calculating solubility parameters can be found in Refs. 4-7. 

Knowing the crosslink density, it is possible to calculate the Flory-Huggins solvent-polymer interaction parameter x (Flory 1955) using Eq. (4.10) as suggested by Rabek (1977). 

Bawendi MG, Freed KF (1988) Systematic corrections to Flory-Huggins theory polymer-solvent-void systems and binary blend-void systems. J Chem Phys 88 2741-2756 Chang TS (1939) Statistical theory of absorption of double molecules. Proc R Soc Ser A 169 512-531... 

The Flory-Huggins solute-polymer interaction parameter may be also calculated from activity coefficients [16,39]. In the case of pure solvents the equation is ... 

Although the emphasis in these last chapters is certainly on the polymeric solute, the experimental methods described herein also measure the interactions of these solutes with various solvents. Such interactions include the hydration of proteins at one extreme and the exclusion of poor solvents from random coils at the other. In between, good solvents are imbibed into the polymer domain to various degrees to expand coil dimensions. Such quantities as the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, the 0 temperature, and the coil expansion factor are among the ways such interactions are quantified in the following chapters. 

We concluded the last section with the observation that a polymer solution is expected to be nonideal on the grounds of entropy considerations alone. A nonzero value for AH would exacerbate the situation even further. We therefore begin our discussion of this problem by assuming a polymer-solvent system which shows athermal mixing. In the next section we shall extend the theory to include systems for which AH 9 0. The theory we shall examine in the next few sections was developed independently by Flory and Huggins and is known as the Flory-Huggins theory. 

Since the 0 s are fractions, the logarithms in Eq. (8.38) are less than unity and AGj is negative for all concentrations. In the case of athermal mixtures entropy considerations alone are sufficient to account for polymer-solvent miscibility at all concentrations. Exactly the same is true for ideal solutions. As a matter of fact, it is possible to regard the expressions for AS and AGj for ideal solutions as special cases of Eqs. (8.37) and (8.38) for the situation where n happens to equal unity. The following example compares values for ASj for ideal and Flory-Huggins solutions to examine quantitatively the effect of variations in n on the entropy of mixing. 

More fundamental treatments of polymer solubihty go back to the lattice theory developed independentiy and almost simultaneously by Flory (13) and Huggins (14) in 1942. By imagining the solvent molecules and polymer chain segments to be distributed on a lattice, they statistically evaluated the entropy of solution. The enthalpy of solution was characterized by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, which is related to solubihty parameters by equation 5. For high molecular weight polymers in monomeric solvents, the Flory-Huggins solubihty criterion is X A 0.5. 

Experimental values of X have been tabulated for a number of polymer-solvent systems (4,12). Unfortunately, they often turn out to be concentration and molecular weight dependent, reducing their practical utility. The Flory-Huggins theory quahtatively predicts several phenomena observed in solutions of polymers, including molecular weight effects, but it rarely provides a good quantitative fit of data. Considerable work has been done subsequentiy to modify and improve the theory (15,16). 

The well-known Flory treatment [50-52] of the en-thropic contribution to the Gibbs energy of mixing of polymers with solvents is still the simplest and most reliable theory developed. It is quite apparent, however, that the Flory-Huggins theory was established on the basis of the experimental behavior of only a few mixtures investigated over a very narrow range of temperature. Strict applications of the Flory-Huggins approach... 

The formation mechanism of structure of the crosslinked copolymer in the presence of solvents described on the basis of the Flory-Huggins theory of polymer solutions has been considered by Dusek [1,2]. In accordance with the proposed thermodynamic model [3], the main factors affecting phase separation in the course of heterophase crosslinking polymerization are the thermodynamic quality of the solvent determined by Huggins constant x for the polymer-solvent system and the quantity of the crosslinking agent introduced (polyvinyl comonomers). The theory makes it possible to determine the critical degree of copolymerization at which phase separation takes place. The study of this phenomenon is complex also because the comonomers act as diluents. 

By using the liquid lattice approach to treat the random mixing of a disoriented polymer and a solvent, the so-called Flory-Huggins theory is often used to correlate the penetrant activity and the composition of the solution ... 

The Flory-Huggins activity expression for solvent in a solvent(l)/polymer(2) solution is... 

According to Flory-Huggins theory, the heat of mixing of solvent and polymer is proportional to the binary interaction parameter x in equation (3). The parameter x should be inversely proportional to absolute temperature and independent of solution composition. 

In practice, it is difficult to assign the number of repeating segments in solvent or polymer unambiguously. For this reason, it is usual in using Flory-Huggins theory to replace segment fraction (f) in equation (3) by volume fraction ( >). 

The symbol Xs stands for the interaction energy per solvent molecule divided by kT. Combining equations (5.7) and (5.8) gives the Flory-Huggins equation for the free energy of mixing of a polymer solution ... 

Here % is the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter and ( ), is the penetrant volume fraction. In order to use Eqs. (26)—(28) for the prediction of D, one needs a great deal of data. However, much of it is readily available. For example, Vf and Vf can be estimated by equating them to equilibrium liquid volume at 0 K, and Ku/y and K22 - Tg2 can be computed from WLF constants which are available for a large number of polymers [31]. Kn/y and A n - Tg can be evaluated by using solvent viscosity-temperature data [28], The interaction parameters, %, can be determined experimentally and, for many polymer-penetrant systems, are available in the literature. 

Flory-Huggins theory for polymer solutions provides the classical expression for the polymer-solvent mixing term nmis [47] ... 

The role of the solvent in polymer adsorption has been the subject of much discussion. For example, theories have made predictions about the effect of the polymer/solvent interaction (i.e. Flory Huggins x parameter) on adsorption. For many systems, x parameters had already been tabulated so that a number of adsorption studies focused attention on this parameter. In spite of much effort, available data are ambiguous, sometimes verifying and sometimes contradicting the trends predicted by theory. 

Further development of the Flory-Huggins method in direction of taking into account the effects of far interaction, swelling of polymeric ball in good solvents [4, 5], difference of free volumes of polymer and solvent [6, 7] leaded to complication of expression for virial coefficient A and to growth of number of parameters needed for its numerical estimation, but weakly reflected on the possibility of equation (1) to describe the osmotic pressure of polymeric solutions in a wide range of concentrations. 

Roult s law is known to fail for vapour-liquid equilibrium calculations in polymeric systems. The Flory-Huggins relationship is generally used for this purpose (for details, see mass-transfer models in Section 3.2.1). The polymer-solvent interaction parameter, xo of the Flory-Huggins equation is not known accurately for PET. Cheong and Choi used a value of 1.3 for the system PET/EG for modelling a rotating-disc reactor [113], For other polymer solvent systems, yj was found to be in the range between 0.3 and 0.5 [96],... 

For the solubility of TPA in prepolymer, no data are available and the polymer-solvent interaction parameter X of the Flory-Huggins relationship is not accurately known. No experimental data are available for the vapour pressures of dimer or trimer. The published values for the diffusion coefficient of EG in solid and molten PET vary by orders of magnitude. For the diffusion of water, acetaldehyde and DEG in polymer, no reliable data are available. It is not even agreed upon if the mutual diffusion coefficients depend on the polymer molecular weight or on the melt viscosity, and if they are linear or exponential functions of temperature. Molecular modelling, accompanied by the rapid growth of computer performance, will hopefully help to solve this problem in the near future. The mass-transfer mechanisms for by-products in solid PET are not established, and the dependency of the solid-state polycondensation rate on crystallinity is still a matter of assumptions. 

Several authors have attempted to corrolate the degradation rate with such solvent parameters as osmotic coefficient [35], viscosity [36-38] and the Flory Huggins interaction parameter, % [39,40] - a low % value indicates a good solvent in which the polymer is expected to exhibit an open conformation (as opposed to coiled) and therefore is more susceptible to degradation (Fig. 5.15). 

---