Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fitting to Experimental Data

An alternative suggestion, based on a mathematical model fitted to experimental data, is that initiation occurs by thermolysis of a carbon—hydrogen bond ... [Pg.340]

Equation (5) was fitted to experimental data for the thermal conductivity of CBCF heat treated at various temperatures for 10, 15, and 20 seconds, and a linear relationship was determined for Z and the heat temperature, T , which is given by Eq. (6). [Pg.180]

In summary, it can be said that all the dispersion equations that have been developed will give a good fit to experimental data, but only the Van Deemter equation, the Giddings equation and the Knox equation give positive and real values for the constants in the respective equations. [Pg.331]

Experimental evidence regarding the power law is somewhat contradictory. A constant value of 3 = 0..5 is considered to give a good fit to experimental data by many authors. According to Awbi, p depends on the flow regime and has a value of 0..5 for fully turbulent flow and 1,0 for laminar flow.- fn practice the value of P tends to be between 0.6 and 0.7. [Pg.580]

Models which include exact exchange are often called hybrid methods, the names Adiabatic Connection Model (ACM) and Becke 3 parameter functional (B3) are examples of such hybrid models defined by eq. (6.35). The <, d and parameters are determined by fitting to experimental data and depend on the form chosen for typical values are a 0.2, d 0.7 and c 0.8. Owing to the substantially better performance of such parameterized functionals the Half-and-Half model is rarely used anymore. The B3 procedure has been generalized to include more filling parameters, however, the improvement is rather small. [Pg.188]

For solvent models where the cavity/dispersion interaction is parameterized by fitting to experimental solvation energies, the use of a few explicit solvent molecules for the first solvation sphere is not recommended, as the parameterization represents a best fit to experimental data without any explicit solvent present. [Pg.394]

Regarding current ab initio calculations it is probably fair to say that they are not really ab initio in every respect since they incorporate many empirical parameters. For example, a standard HF/6-31G calculation would generally be called "ab initio", but all the exponents and contraction coefficients in the basis set are selected by fitting to experimental data. Some say that this feature is one of the main reasons for the success of the Pople basis sets. Because they have been fit to real data these basis sets, not surprisingly, are good at reproducing real data. This is said to occur because the basis set incorporates systematical errors that to a large extent cancel the systematical errors in the Hartree-Fock approach. These features are of course not limited to the Pople sets. Any basis set with fixed exponent and/or contraction coefficients have at some point been adjusted to fit some data. Clearly it becomes rather difficult to demarcate sharply between so-called ab initio and semi-empirical methods.4... [Pg.96]

In semi-empirical methods, complicated integrals are set equal to parameters that provide the best fit to experimental data, such as enthalpies of formation. Semi-empirical methods are applicable to a wide range of molecules with a virtually limitless number of atoms, and are widely popular. The quality of results is very dependent on using a reasonable set of experimental parameters that have the same values across structures, and so this kind of calculation has been very successful in organic chemistry, where there are just a few different elements and molecular geometries. [Pg.700]

While K3 and A as explained later were estimated using a fit to experimental data m and n arbitrarily set equal to 0.5 and 1.75 respectively. [Pg.53]

These results have been fit to experimental data obtained for the reaction between a diisocyanate and a trifunctional polyester polyol, catalyzed by dibutyltindilaurate, in our laboratory RIM machine (Figure 2). No phase separation occurs during this reaction. Reaction order, n, activation energy, Ea, and the preexponential factor. A, were taken as adjustable parameters to fit adiabatic temperature rise data. Typical comparison between the experimental and numerical results are shown in Figure 7. The fit is quite satisfactory and gives reasonable values for the fit parameters. Figure 8 shows how fractional conversion of diisocyanate is predicted to vary as a function of time at the centerline and at the mold wall (remember that molecular diffusion has been assumed to be negligible). [Pg.157]

A strict kinetic limitation based on the gas-phase reactant can be modeled using a variable value for h although experience shows that a first order rate expressions with n=l often provides an excellent fit to experimental data regardless of the underlying reaction mechanism. A site-competition model such as Equation (10.12) can also be used. [Pg.420]

This equation can be fit to experimental data in several ways. The model exhibits a sharp first appearance time, tf st = rpt, which corresponds to the fastest material moving through the system. The mean residence time is found using Equation (15.13), and Xp = tf,rsi/1 is found by observing the time when the experimental washout function first drops below 1.0. It can also be fit from the slope of a plot of In W versus t. This should give a straight line (for t > tfirst) with slope = 1/(F— tfirst)- Another approach is to calculate the dimen-... [Pg.549]

The adsorption free energy and other parameters may be determined, provided that a proper adsorption isotherm is identified and is fitted to experimental data. However, it is usually difficult to unequivocally choose an appropriate isotherm an experimental isotherm may well be fitted to a multitude of theoretical isotherms having several adjustable parameters. If the adsorption isotherm at a very small surface coverage is accessible experimentally, the adsorption free energy can be determined from the limiting slope of the isotherm, as all isotherms reduce to Henry s law when 6 0 ... [Pg.124]

The kinetic models were fitted to experimental data at specific conditions of molar feed ratio and temperature. The models are only valid for these conditions. Use for nonequimolar feeds or at different temperatures will not be valid. [Pg.90]

Different models often give very similar predictions over a limited range of conditions. However, the differences between different models are likely to become large if used outside the range over which they were fitted to experimental data. [Pg.90]

Fig.30 Plots of Io(ocl) against /. The experimental formula was obtained by fitting to experimental data. The other solid curve shows the equation ve oc l/l... [Pg.176]

Figure 2. Relative amounts of various iron species deduced from 57Fe Mossbauer spectra of the Fe-exchanged samples shown in relation to the progress of the hydrothermal crystallization process at 80°C (A), 57Fe Mossbauer spectra of the Fe-exchanged samples after 0 (a), 120 (b), 180 (c) and 240 min (d) of the hydrothermal crystallization process at 80°C (B) and RBS spectra collected on five different particles of the sample crystallized for 240 min (C). The position of surface Fe in Fig. 2C is marked by the vertical arrow. Depth scale (depth into each particle) is increasing toward left (marked with the horizontal arrow). Fit to experimental data with assumed homogeneous depth distribution of Fe is marked with the continuous line. Figure 2. Relative amounts of various iron species deduced from 57Fe Mossbauer spectra of the Fe-exchanged samples shown in relation to the progress of the hydrothermal crystallization process at 80°C (A), 57Fe Mossbauer spectra of the Fe-exchanged samples after 0 (a), 120 (b), 180 (c) and 240 min (d) of the hydrothermal crystallization process at 80°C (B) and RBS spectra collected on five different particles of the sample crystallized for 240 min (C). The position of surface Fe in Fig. 2C is marked by the vertical arrow. Depth scale (depth into each particle) is increasing toward left (marked with the horizontal arrow). Fit to experimental data with assumed homogeneous depth distribution of Fe is marked with the continuous line.
A general expression can be found by combining these two cases (Melis et al., 1999). In these expressions, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the fluid temperature (Kelvin), ji is the fluid viscosity, y is the local shear rate, and a is an efficiency factor. For shear-induced breakage, the kernel is usually fit to experimental data (Wang et al., 2005a,b). A typical form is (Pandya and Spielman, 1983) as follows ... [Pg.280]

Theoretical models include those based on classical (Newtonian) mechanical methods—force field methods known as molecular mechanical methods. These include MM2, MM3, Amber, Sybyl, UFF, and others described in the following paragraphs. These methods are based on Hook s law describing the parabolic potential for the stretching of a chemical bond, van der Waal s interactions, electrostatics, and other forces described more fully below. The combination assembled into the force field is parameterized based on fitting to experimental data. One can treat 1500-2500 atom systems by molecular mechanical methods. Only this method is treated in detail in this text. Other theoretical models are based on quantum mechanical methods. These include ... [Pg.129]

In solution thermodynamics the standard or reference states of the components of the solution are important. Although the standard state in principle can be chosen freely, the standard state is in practice not taken by chance, but does in most cases reflect the type of model one wants to fit to experimental data. The choice of... [Pg.67]


See other pages where Fitting to Experimental Data is mentioned: [Pg.2829]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.151]   


SEARCH



Data fitting

Fitting to data

© 2024 chempedia.info