Finite high-order

Table 8.6 traces the evolution of the approximating CA rules as e increases from 0 to 1 for 2 < s < 3. We see that as e increases, only 7 of the 32 possible rules are actually visited. Nonetheless, even at this crude first order approximation, a remnant of the CML s transition to spatiotemporal intermittency remains. In particular, there is a threshold value of e, = 2 — 4/s, that acts as a boundary point below which the approximating CA-rule is simple-periodic (class 1 or 2) and above which it is complex (class 3 or 4). The surprising fact is not that the CML s transition appears to bo approximated by the CA-rule path - after all, allowing for finite-length computer words, the CML itself is essentially just a very-high order CA... 

II. Stable high-order central finite difference schemes on composite adaptive grids with sharp shock resolution,... 

Sometimes the spectrometer completely obliterates the information at all Fourier frequencies co beyond some finite cutoff Q. This is specifically true of dispersive optical spectrometers, where the aperture determines 1. The cutoff Q may be extended to high Fourier frequencies by multipassing the dispersive element or employing the high orders from a diffraction grating. 

Most numerical methods for calculating molecular hyperpolarizability use sum over states expressions in either a time-dependent (explicitly including field dependent dispersion terms) or time-independent perturbation theory framework [13,14]. Sum over states methods require an ability to determine the excited states of the system reliably. This can become computationally demanding, especially for high order hyperpolarizabilities [15]. An alternative strategy adds a finite electric field term to the hamiltonian and computes the hyperpolarizability from the derivatives of the field dependent molecular dipole moment. Finite-field calculations use the ground state wave function only and include the influence of the field in a self-consistent manner [16]. 

The finite volume methods have been used to discretised the partial differential equations of the model using the Simple method for pressure-velocity coupling and the second order upwind scheme to interpolate the variables on the surface of the control volume. The segregated solution algorithm was selected. The Reynolds stress turbulence model was used in this model due to the anisotropic nature of the turbulence in cyclones. Standard fluent wall functions were applied and high order discretisation schemes were also used. 

S. S. Abarbanel and A. E. Chertock. Strict stability of high-order compact implicit finite-difference schemes the role of boundary conditions for hyperbolic PDEs, I. J. Comput. Phys., 160 42-66, 2000. 

The difference equation or numerical integration method for vibrational wavefunctions usually referred to as the Numerov-Cooley method [111] has been extended by Dykstra and Malik [116] to an open-ended method for the analytical differentiation of the vibrational Schrodinger equation of a diatomic. This is particularly important for high-order derivatives (i.e., hyperpolarizabilities) where numerical difficulties may limit the use of finite-field treatments. As in Numerov-Cooley, this is a procedure that invokes the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. The accuracy of the results are limited only by the quality of the electronic wavefunction s description of the stretching potential and of the electrical property functions and by the adequacy of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. 

The bottleneck in calculating P" " and p=- f "= from analytical expressions is due to the required evaluation of high-order derivatives with respect to the normal modes [34]. This problem can be circumvented by using Finite Field (FF) methods with the nuclear relaxation/curvature approach, which is the major advantage of the... 

The selected mathematical model is represented by a discretization method for approximating the differential equations by a system of algebraic equations for the variables at some set of discrete locations in space and time. Many different approaches are used in reactor engineering , but the most important of them are the simple finite difference methods (FDMs), the flrrx conservative finite volume methods (FVMs), and the accurate high order weighted residual methods (MWRs). 

The finite approximations to be used in the discretization process have to be selected. In a finite difference method, approximations for the derivatives at the grid points have to be selected. In a finite volume method, one has to select the methods of approximating surface and volume integrals. In a weighted residual method, one has to select appropriate trail - and weighting functions. A compromise between simplicity, ease of implementation, accuracy and computational efficiency has to be made. For the low order finite difference- and finite volume methods, at least second order discretization schemes (both in time and space) are recommended. For the WRMs, high order approximations are normally employed. 

Demirdzic I, Lilek Z, Peric M (1993) A Collocated Finite Volume Method for Predicting Flows at all Speeds. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 16 1029-1050 Deville MO, Fischer PF, Mund EH (2002) High-Order Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge... 

The reader should note that in Eqs. (B.2)-(B.5) the spatial derivative appears on the right-hand side, and therefore it will be necessary to define a realizable high-order FVM for each case. In contrast, the source term S in Eq. (B.l) contains no spatial derivatives and hence is local in each finite-volume grid cell. In other words, with operator splitting the source term leads to a (stiff) ordinary differential equation (ODE) for each grid cell. 

Vikas, V, Wang, Z. J. Fox, R. O. 2012 Realizable high-order finite-volume schemes for quadrature-based moment methods applied to diffusion population balance equations. Journal of Computational Physics (submitted). 

---