Field relativistic invariance

The previous results become somewhat more transparent when consideration is given to the manner in which matrix elements transform under Lorentz transformations. The matrix elements are c numbers and express the results of measurements. Since relativistic invariance is a statement concerning the observable consequences of the theory, it is perhaps more natural to state the requirements of invariance as a requirement that matrix elements transform properly. If Au(x) is a vector field, call... 

Similar remarks apply to the negaton-positon field operator. From spectral assumptions mid relativistic invariance we have previously concluded that... 

The relativistic invariance of the electromagnetic field is conveniently expressed in tensor notation. Factorized in Minkowski space the Maxwell equa-... 

Methods for treating relativistic effects in molecular quantum mechanics have always seemed to me, if I may say so without appearing too impertinent to those who work in the field, a complete dog s breakfast. The difficulty is to know to what question they are supposed to be the answer, in the circumstances in which we find ourselves. We do not know what a relativistically invariant theory applicable to molecular behaviour might look like. As was pointed out to us at the last meeting, the Dirac equation certainly will not do to describe interacting electrons and even at the single particle level, where it seems to work, there is an inconsistency in interpreting its solutions in terms... 

Heitler spoke on the quantum theory of damping, which is a heuristic attempt to eliminate the infinities of quantum field theory in a relativistic invariant manner, Peierls spoke of the problem of self-energy, and Op-penheimer gave an account of the developments of the last years in electrodynamics in which he discussed the problem of the vacuum polarization and charge renormalization with special reference to the recent work of Schwinger and Tomonaga. 

Given the electromagnetic 4-vector field A/( = (A, i(p) and the 4-velocity m/( = (yv, iyc), W is the classical limit of a relativistic invariant y W = A u. This term augments the tree-particle relativistic Lagrangian to give... 

The further developments of quantum mechanics, including the discussion of maximal measurements consisting not of the accurate determination of the values of a minimum number of independent dynamical functions but of the approximate measurement of a larger number, the use of the theory of groups, the formulation of a relativistically invariant theory, the quantization of the electromagnetic field, etc., are beyond the scope of this book. 

Efforts to use relativistic dynamics to describe nuclear phenomena began in the 1950s with application to infinite nuclear matter. Johnson and Teller [Jo 55] developed a nonrelativistic field theory for interacting nucleons and neutral, scalar mesons which served as a catalyst for Duerr, who, in a landmark paper [Du 56], developed a relativistic invariant version of the Johnson and Teller model which included both scalar and vector meson fields. He showed that nuclear saturation and the strong spin-orbit potential of the shell model could be readily understood. He also predicted a single particle potential which qualitatively reproduced the real part of the central optical potential well depth and its energy dependence for incident kinetic energies up to 200 MeV. 

At this stage we postpone the non-linear excitations of this model to a subsequent Chapter, we only discuss some of the symmetries of this model which are of relevance also for these excitations. First we note that the form of the electronic part of the Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) has exactly the form of a (relativistic invariant) Dirac operator in one dimension. This correspondence has been exploited [7] successfully in obtaining solutions of this model from results known in models of elementary particles. We remark here that similar analogies can be made for specific forms of the Fermi surface also in higher dimensions. Thus the connection between solid state physics and quantum field theory models can be used for a better understanding of both. 

Although Dirac s equation does not directly admit of a completely self-consistent single-particle interpretation, such an interpretation is physically acceptable and of practical use, provided the potential varies little over distances of the order of the Compton wavelength (h/mc) of the particle in question. It allows, for instance, first-order relativistic corrections to the spectrum of the hydrogen atom and to the core-level densities of many-electron atoms. The latter aspect is of special chemical importance. The required calculations are invariably numerical in nature and this eliminates the need to investigate central-field solutions in the same detail as for Schrodinger s equation. A brief outline suffices. 

As argued, infinitesimal field generators appear as a by-product of this novel quantization scheme, so that B° is rigorously nonzero from the symmetry of the Poincare group and the B cyclic theorem is an invariant of the classical field. The basics of infinitesimal field generators on the classical level are to be found in the theory of relativistic spin angular momentum [42,46] and relies on the Pauli-Lubanski pseudo-4-vector ... 

There are both theoretical and experimental reasons to search for CPT violations. The strong theoretical incentive is that, even though the CPT invariance is required to formulate a quantum field theory consistent with special relativity, it turns out to be difficult to construct a gravitational relativistic quantum field theory of the GUT type with the CPT symmetry maintained. In other words it is difficult to incorporate the CPT invariance in the GUT-type extensions of the Standard Model. 

This paper presents an account of the dynamics of electric charges coupled to electromagnetic fields. The main approximation is to use non-relativistic forms for the charge and current density. A quantum theory requires either a Lagrangian or a Hamiltonian formulation of the dynamics in atomic and molecular physics the latter is almost universal so the main thrust of the paper is the development of a general Hamiltonian. It is this Hamiltonian that provides the basis for a recent demonstration that the S-matrix on the energy shell is gauge-invariant to all orders of perturbation theory. 

Noether s theorem will be proved here for a classical relativistic theory defined by a generic field , which may have spinor or tensor indices. The Lagrangian density (, 9/x) is assumed to be Lorentz invariant and to depend only on scalar forms defined by spinor or tensor fields. It is assumed that coordinate displacements are described by Jacobi s theorem S(d4x) = d4x 9/xgeneral variation of the action integral, evaluated over a closed space-time region 2, is... 

---