Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Field monitor, pesticide exposure

C.P. Weisskopf and J.N. Seiber, New approaches to the analysis of organophosphate metabolites in the urine of field workers, in ACS Symposium Series Biological Monitoring for Pesticide Exposure Measurement, Estimation, and Risk Reduction, eds. R.G.M. Wang, C.A. Franklin, R.C. Honeycutt, and J.C. Reinert, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 206-214 (1989). [Pg.958]

Determination of the efficiency for pesticide exposure reduction with protective clothing a field study using biological monitoring... [Pg.63]

The Department has developed methods for monitoring the exposure of workers exposed to organophosphate and carbamate pesticides. These methods utilize the determination of plasma and red blood cell cholinesterase activities and urinary alkyl phosphates. Studies are reported vrti ich show that these methods have proven useful in evaluating the safety effectiveness of closed-transfer systems and in determining reentry times for field workers. [Pg.54]

Occupational pesticide exposure holds a peculiar status within the field of occupational health and safety, both from a scientific and regulatory perspective. Methods for personal monitoring of dermal exposure first arose in the context of pesticide applications in agriculture, pioneered by scientists in the USA Public Health Service (Batchelor and Walker, 1954 Durham and Wolfe, 1962). These methods gained worldwide recognition in the early 1960s, and remain a component of exposure assessment practice today. This work pre-dated most personal monitoring methods that were developed for industrial workplaces. [Pg.14]

Griffith, J., and Duncan, R. C. (1983). An a.sses.smeni of field-worker occupational exposure to pesticides in the Florida citms industry. In National Monitoring Study Citrus, Vol, 3, Univ, of Miami Press, Miami. [Pg.590]

Erythrocyte cholinesterase levels were monitored in two men exposed dermally to methyl parathion after entering a cotton field that had been sprayed with this pesticide (Nemec et al. 1968). The field was entered on two separate occasions twice within 2 hours after an ultra-low-volume spraying and a third time within 24 hours after spraying. Dermal methyl parathion residues 2 hours after spraying were 2-10 mg on the arms dermal residues 24 hours after spraying were 0.16-0.35 mg on the arms. The exposed individuals did not have signs of cholinergic toxicity, but erythrocyte cholinesterase levels after the third exposure were 60-65% of preexposure levels. [Pg.79]

Dietary exposure to pesticides (or to xenobiotics in general) is determined by calculating the product of the amount of chemical in or on the food and the total quantity of food consumed. The quantity of chemical potentially consumed in foods can be estimated from data obtained from residue field trials, metabolism studies, and/or monitoring data. Information from these sources is then analyzed with one of several available models containing food consumption factors from surveys conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). For calculation of... [Pg.413]

Field crews that normally apply pesticides were monitored during their routine working day with as little interruption as possible to their customary work procedures or habits. When human error or mechanical irregularities occurred, the study was continued, and the irregularity was incorporated into the analysis of data. In this way we could monitor exposure that would include unexpected difficulties and spontaneous or habitual human reactions under actual "real-life" conditions. [Pg.321]

Microcosm and mesocosm studies can be directly designed for the purpose of EQS derivation (e.g., the exposure scenario, communities to be monitored, etc.). Guidance for design and conduction of microcosm and mesocosm studies can be found in the references given for pesticide risk assessment, but OECD has recently published a guideline for a lentic field test that is not focused on pesticides alone (OECD 2006b). [Pg.74]


See other pages where Field monitor, pesticide exposure is mentioned: [Pg.514]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.926]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.924]    [Pg.940]    [Pg.956]    [Pg.1008]    [Pg.1069]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.37]   


SEARCH



Pesticide exposure

Pesticide monitoring

© 2024 chempedia.info