Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Field desorption nonvolatile samples

The main difference between field ionization (FI) and field desorption ionization (FD) lies in the manner in which the sample is examined. For FI, the substance under investigation is heated in a vacuum so as to volatilize it onto an ionization surface. In FD, the substance to be examined is placed directly onto the surface before ionization is implemented. FI is quite satisfactory for volatile, thermally stable compounds, but FD is needed for nonvolatile and/or thermally labile substances. Therefore, most FI sources are arranged to function also as FD sources, and the technique is known as FI/FD mass spectrometry. [Pg.23]

For nonvolatile or thermally labile samples, a solution of the substance to be examined is applied to the emitter electrode by means of a microsyringe outside the ion source. After evaporation of the solvent, the emitter is put into the ion source and the ionizing voltage is applied. By this means, thermally labile substances, such as peptides, sugars, nucleosides, and so on, can be examined easily and provide excellent molecular mass information. Although still FI, this last ionization is referred to specifically as field desorption (FD). A comparison of FI and FD spectra of D-glucose is shown in Figure 5.6. [Pg.26]

Field desorption (FD) was introduced by Beckey in 1969 [76]. FD was the first soft ionization method that could generate intact ions from nonvolatile compounds, such as small peptides [77]. The principal difference between FD and FI is the sample injection. Rather than being in the gas phase as in FI, analytes in FD are placed onto the emitter and desorbed from its surface. Application of the analyte onto the emitter can be performed by just dipping the activated emitter in a solution. The emitter is then introduced into the ion source of the spectrometer. The positioning of the emitter is cmcial for a successful experiment, and so is the temperature setting. In general, FI and FD are now replaced by more efficient ionization methods, such as MALDI and ESI. For a description of FD (and FI), see Reference 78. [Pg.27]

The other approach to making ions is ionization in the condensed phase and delivering ions to the gas phase. One of the most popular methods of this type is electrospray ionization (ESI see also Section 2.28.2). " In this technique, ions are formed in solution and then electrosprayed to the gas phase, where desolvation takes place prior to mass analysis. A variety of desorption ionization (DI) methods is used for the analysis of nonvolatile samples. Ions can be formed and desorbed from solution or from the solid phase by applying strong electric fields (field desorption, FD) 35,4i bombarding the sample by fast-moving atoms (fast-atom bombardment, FAB)" " or ions (secondary ion mass spectrometry, SIMS) " " by heavy-atom ( Cf) fission products (plasma desorption, PD) " " " or by a laser beam (laser desorption, LD, or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization, MALDI). In these methods, ionization may take place either in the condensed phase, followed by evaporation of the ions in the gas phase, as a result of interactions with matrix ions or in a supercompressed gas. [Pg.369]

One of the major problems in analytical chemistry is the detection and identification of non-volatile compounds at low concentration levels. Mass spectrometry is widely used in the analysis of such compounds, providing an exact mass, and hence species identification. However, successful and unequivocal identification, and quantitative detection, relies on volatilization of the compound into the gas phase prior to injection into the analyser. This constimtes a major problem for thermally labile samples, as they rapidly decompose upon heating. In order to circumvent this difficulty, a wide range of techniques have been developed and applied to the analysis of nonvolatile species, including fast atom bombardment (FAB), field desorption (FD), laser desorption (LD), plasma desorption mass spectrometry (PDMS) and secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). Separating the steps of desorption and ionization can provide an important advantage, as it allows both processes to be... [Pg.3]

Field (desorption) ionization (FDI) was first described by Beckey in 1969 [4]. In FDI, the sample solution is deposited on a lO-qm-diameter FDI emitter, which is activated to provide for whiskers or microneedles on the surface [5, 6]. The emitter is kept at a high potential (> 5 kV) in the high-vacuum ion source, mostly of a sector instmment (see Fig. 7.1). By passing through a current, slow heating of the emitter is achieved. As heating of the emitter continues, nonvolatile analytes can be desorbed and ionized by various mechanisms. High local electrical fields at the... [Pg.206]

The development of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MAEDI) has advanced the entire field of mass spectrometry. To use this ionization method, the sample is mixed into a matrix that absorbs the laser wavelength extremely well (approximately 10,000 1 matrix analyte) and the mixture is placed on a solid substrate. Absorption of the laser causes the matrix to explode, ejecting the intact, nonvolatile molecules of interest into the gas phase. Proton exchange or alkali metal attachment occurs in the gas plume and the ionized species can be detected. [Pg.85]


See other pages where Field desorption nonvolatile samples is mentioned: [Pg.374]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.124]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.123 ]




SEARCH



Field desorption

Field sampling

Nonvolatile

Sample Desorption

© 2024 chempedia.info