Felkin-Anh

The issue of stereochemistry, on the other hand, is more ambiguous. A priori, an aldol condensation between compounds 3 and 4 could proceed with little or no selectivity for a particular aldol dia-stereoisomer. For the desired C-7 epimer (compound 2) to be produced preferentially, the crucial aldol condensation between compounds 3 and 4 would have to exhibit Cram-Felkin-Anh selectivity22 23 (see 3 + 4 - 2, Scheme 9). In light of observations made during the course of Kishi s lasalocid A synthesis,12 there was good reason to believe that the preferred stereochemical course for the projected aldol reaction between intermediates 3 and 4 would be consistent with a Cram-Felkin-Anh model. Thus, on the basis of the lasalocid A precedent, it was anticipated that compound 2 would emerge as the major product from an aldol coupling of intermediates 3 and 4. 

Cram s open-chain model 229 Cram s rule 229, 233 Cram chelate model 229 Cram cyclic model 229 Cram-Felkin-Anh model 191,207, 236 f 246 cubane 12,318 cyanoacetic acid 636 f. cyanohydrin, protected 145, 150 f. cyclic carbonate protection 541 f., 657, 659 f., 666, 670 cyclization -,6-endo 734 -, 5-exo 733 f. 

In the presence of catalytic amounts of Pd(0), silicon-substituted vinyloxiranes can rearrange into the corresponding ot-silyl- 3,y-unsaturated aldehydes (Scheme 9.34) [151]. Treatment of 80 with Pd(OAc)2 and P(OPh)3 results in the formation of 7t-allylpalladium complex 81. Bond rotation to give 82, followed by migration of the silyl moiety, affords aldehyde 83, which is trapped in situ to provide the Felkin-Anh product 84. The reaction proceeds with retention of configuration and the ee of the starting material is retained in the product. The size of the silicon substituents is critical for the outcome of the reaction, as is the choice of ligands on palladium. 

In accord with the Felkin-Anh model, a-chiral ketones react more diastereoselectively than the corresponding aldehydes. Increasing steric demand of the acyl substituent increases the Cram selectivity. Due to the size of the acyl substituent, the incoming nucleophile is pushed towards the stereogenic center and therefore the diastereoface selection becomes more effective (see also Section 1.3.1.1.). Thus, addition of methyllithium to 4-methyl-4-phenyl-3-hexanonc (15) proceeds with higher diastercoselectivity than the addition of ethyllithium to 3-methyl-3-phenyl-2-pen-tanone (14)32. 

The lower diastereoselectivity found with aldehyde 15 (R = CH3) can be explained by the steric influence of the two methyl substituents in close vicinity to the stereogenic center, which probably diminishes the ability of the ether oxygen to coordinate. In contrast, a significant difference in the diastereoselectivity was found in the additions of phenyllithium and phenylmagnesium bromide to isopropylidene glyceraldehyde (17)58 (see also Section 1.3.1.3.6.). Presumably the diastereo-sclcctivity of the phenyllithium addition is determined by the ratio of chelation-controlled to nonchelation-controlled attack of the nucleophile, whereas in the case of phenylmagnesium bromide additional chelation with the / -ether oxygen may occur. Formation of the -chelate 19 stabilizes the Felkin-Anh transition state and therefore increases the proportion of the anZz -diastereomeric addition product. 

I-Oialkoxy carbonyl compounds are a special class of chiral alkoxy carbonyl compounds because they combine the structural features, and, therefore, also the stereochemical behavior, of 7-alkoxy and /i-alkoxy carbonyl compounds. Prediction of the stereochemical outcome of nucleophilic additions to these substrates is very difficult and often impossible. As exemplified with isopropylidene glyceraldehyde (Table 15), one of the most widely investigated a,/J-di-alkoxy carbonyl compoundsI0S, the predominant formation of the syn-diastereomer 2 may be attributed to the formation of the a-chelate 1 A. The opposite stereochemistry can be rationalized by assuming the Felkin-Anh-type transition state IB. Formation of the /(-chelate 1C, which stabilizes the Felkin-Anh transition state, also leads to the predominant formation of the atm -diastereomeric reaction product. 

Thus chelation control " may lead to either product, depending on the relative stabilities of the respective ot- and /(-chelates. In cases with predominant formation of the anri-diastereomer, it is often difficult to establish whether the formation of a /(-chelate or an open-chain Felkin - Anh transition state is responsible for the observed stereochemistry the decision usually rests on plausibility considerations. Thus, with regard to the results obtained for a-alkoxy carbonyl... 

As outlined in Section D.2.3.5., the stereochemical outcome of the addition of nucleophilic reagents to chiral aldehydes or ketones is rationalized most plausibly by the Cram-Felkin-Anh model. On the other hand, the corresponding reactions of oxygen- or nitrogen-heterosub-stituted aldehydes or ketones may be interpreted either by the same transition state hypothesis or, alternatively, by Cram s cyclic model. 

I.3.4.3.1. Cram-Felkin-Anh Selective Additions of Achiral Enolates to Chiral Aldehydes... 

Similar ratios are obtained from the Reformatsky reaction of methyl bromoacetate28. The predominant formation of the. tyn-isomers is in accordance with Cram s rule1 or with the Felkin-Anh model2. 

The addition of lithium enolates to 2-alkoxyaldehydes occurs either in a completely non-stereoselective manner, or with moderate selectivity in favor of the product predicted by the Cram-Felkin-Anh model28 ( nonchelation control 3, see reference 28 for a survey of this type of addition to racemic aldehydes). Thus, a 1 1 mixture of the diastereomeric adducts results from the reaction of lithiated tert-butyl acetate and 2-benzyloxypropanal4,28. 

If a chiral aldehyde, e.g., methyl (27 ,4S)-4-formyl-2-methylpentanoate (syn-1) is attacked by an achiral enolate (see Section 1.3.4.3.1.), the induced stereoselectivity is directed by the aldehyde ( inherent aldehyde selectivity ). Predictions of the stereochemical outcome are possible (at least for 1,2- and 1,3-induction) based on the Cram—Felkin Anh model or Cram s cyclic model (see Sections 1.3.4.3.1. and 1.3.4.3.2.). If, however, the enantiomerically pure aldehyde 1 is allowed to react with both enantiomers of the boron enolate l-rerr-butyldimethylsilyloxy-2-dibutylboranyloxy-1-cyclohexyl-2-butene (2), it must be expected that the diastereofacial selec-tivitics of the aldehyde and enolate will be consonant in one of the combinations ( matched pair 29), but will be dissonant in the other combination ( mismatched pair 29). This would lead to different ratios of the adducts 3a/3b and 4a/4b. 

These results may be explained by a chelation-controlled mechanism A with M representing a complex of JVtg(ll), Ce( 111) or of both cations. The highly stereoselective addition of the organocop-per reagent can be rationalized either by the dipolar model B or the Felkin-Anh model C (see also ref 12). 

The stereochemical course of the reaction may be explained by analogy to the Felkin-Anh model 7. 

After recrystallization from hexane, the major diastereomer is obtained in a 71 % yield. Although interpretation of the steric course of the reaction is difficult25, the preferred formation of the (6S )-diastereomer may be rationalized in terms of an imine conformation which is favored according to the Felkin-Anh model (vicinal C-O orthogonal to C = N)26 and by chelation21. 

Scheme 25 Anti-Felkin-Anh selectivity in the reductive aldol reaction of a-alkoxy and a-aminoaldehydes...

The stereochemical outcome of the Mukaiyama reaction can be controlled by the type of Lewis acid used. With bidentate Lewis acids the aldol reaction led to the anti products through a Cram chelate control [366]. Alternatively, the use of a monoden-tate Lewis acid in this reaction led to the syn product through an open Felkin-Anh... 

Scheme 21.11 Felkin-Anh model for the hydrogenation of keto phosphate.

Usually, the diastereoselectivity in Michael additions is the one predicted by the Felkin-Anh model.57 However, it was discovered that in the case of the addition of highly hindered nucleophiles, as potassium phthalimide and succinimide, the major product has the opposite configuration to the one predicted by this model, because of the presence of steric hindrance interactions.58... 

---