Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Falling films profiles

Future issues for an improved pilot reactor design remain achieving and confirming the same falling film profile in the microchannels for the laboratory and pilot reactor. The film shapes are complex and theoretical predictions seem to fail to accurately describe them. It stands to reason that such thin films have a dedicated dependence on the details... [Pg.227]

The concentration profile for a reactant A which must migrate from a drop or bubble into the continuous phase to react might be as shown in Figure 12-10. There is a concentration drop around the spherical drop or bubble because it is migrating outward, but, as with a planar gas-liquid interface in the falling film reactor, there should be a discontinuity in at the interface due to the solubility of species A and a consequent equilibrium distribution between phases. [Pg.495]

Pig. 4. Diffusion into a falling film (a) with flat velocity profile, and (b) with parabolic velocity profile. [Pg.212]

Another solution to Eq. (159) for the diffusion into a falling film with a flat velocity profile is obtained by taking into account the finite thickness of the liquid film 8 and its effect on the concentration profiles that is, the boundary conditions are taken to be... [Pg.213]

Next we consider a fluid flowing through a circular tube with material at the wall diffusing into the moving fluid. This situation is met with in the analysis of the mass transfer to the upward-moving gas stream in wetted-wall-tower experiments. Just as in the discussion of absorption in falling films, we consider mass transfer to a fluid moving with a constant velocity profile and also flow with a parabolic (Poiseuille) profile (see Fig. 5). [Pg.216]

A knowledge of the velocity profiles within falling films under various flow conditions would be of very great value, making it possible to calculate the rates of convective heat and mass transfer processes in flowing films without the need for the simplified models which must be used at present. For instance, the analyses of Hatta (H3, H4) and Vyazovov (V8, V9) indicate clearly the differences in the theoretical mass-transfer rates due to the assumption of linear or semiparabolic velocity profiles in smooth... [Pg.201]

Grimley (G10, Gil) used an ultramicroscope technique to determine the velocities of colloidal particles suspended in a falling film of tap water. It was assumed that the particles moved with the local liquid velocity, so that, by observing the velocities of particles at different distances from the wall, a complete velocity profile could be obtained. These results indicated that the velocity did not follow the semiparabolic pattern predicted by Eq. (11) instead, the maximum velocity occurred a short distance below the free surface, while nearer the wall the experimental results were lower than those given by Eq. (11). It was found, however, that the velocity profile approached the theoretical shape when surface-active material was added and the waves were damped out, and, in the light of later results, it seems probable that the discrepancies in the presence of wavy flow are due to the inclusion of the fluctuating wavy velocities near the free surface. [Pg.202]

First, the overall mass transfer coefRcient k a of the microreactor was estimated to be 3-8 s [43]. For intensified gas liquid contactors, kj a can reach 3 s while bubble columns and agitated tanks do not exceed 0.2 s Reducing the flow rate and, accordingly, the liquid film thickness is a means of further increasing kj a, which is limited, however, by liquid dry-out at very thin films. Despite such large mass transfer coefficients, gas-liquid microreactors such as the falling film device may still operate between mass transfer and kinetic control regimes, as fundamental simulation studies on the carbon dioxide absorption have demonstrated [44]. Distinct concentration profiles in the liquid, and even gas, phase are predicted. [Pg.117]

Flow of a falling film [6]. The velocity (length/time) profile of a fluid in an inclined flat surface can be expressed as... [Pg.26]

Velocity Profile in Falling Film and Differential Momentum Balance. A Newto-... [Pg.210]

Diffusion in a laminar falling film. In Section 2.9C we derived the equation for the velocity profile in a falling film shown in Fig. 7.3-la. We will consider mass transfer of solute A into a laminar falling film, which is important in wetted-wall columns, in developing theories to explain mass transfer in stagnant pockets of fluids, and in turbulent mass transfer. The solute A in the gas is absorbed at the interface and then diffuses a distance into the liquid so that it has not penetrated the whole distance x = <5 at the wall. At steady state the inlet concentration = 0. At a point z distance from the inlet the concentration profile of is shown in Fig. 7.3- la. [Pg.441]

Figure 7.3-1. Diffusion of solute A in a laminar falling film (a) velocity profile and concentration profile, (h) small element for mass balance. Figure 7.3-1. Diffusion of solute A in a laminar falling film (a) velocity profile and concentration profile, (h) small element for mass balance.
When a latest-generation multitube falling-film reactor [23] is adopted for AO suifonation, the reaction heat is almost completely evolved over a few seconds after the contact between the reactants, and to remove the reaction heat it is necessary to ensure, particularly in the first part of the reactor, an efficient cooling capability, without negatively affecting the viscosity profile of the mass undergoing suifonation. [Pg.105]

Diffusion into a falling film (see Figure 7.6)[8]. Consider the diffusion of a solute A into a moving liquid film B. The liquid is in laminar flow. Assuming that (1) the film moves with a flat velocity profile vo, (2) the film may be... [Pg.293]

From this table it becomes clear that 20% of the conversion takes place in the first 0.30 m of the total reactor length, that 50% conversion is passed at 1 m from the top and that 75% is attained after 2.0 m from the top. In fig. 17 the conversion is plotted as a function of the reactor length. This curve is derived from a computer model (Ballestra) of the SOj/air sulphonation in a falling-film reactor tube. This conversion characteristic has significant consequences for the temperature profile and the liquid interface temperature profile over the total reactor length. In fig. 18 the liquid interface temperature is indicated as a function of reactor height and in fig. 19 the "bulk liquid temperature of the film is shown. Both curves indicate clearly a peak temperature about 0.5 m from the top of the reactor. This peak temperature is of significant importance for the product quality. [Pg.136]

The basic model system (9) for vertically falling film are applied. It is easy to generalize this equations for slopped falling films with tangential force r acting along the free surface. For the velocity profile u x,y,t) and self-induced pressure p x,yj) we have... [Pg.197]

A wetted wall tower is a piece of process equipment that uses a liquid film of S meters thickness in laminar flow in the axial (Z direction). Find the velocity profile in the falling film. [Pg.53]

A cold liquid film, initially at temperature Tg, is falling down (in z-direction) a vertical solid wall (xz-plane). The solid wall is maintained at a temperature T ) higher than that of the falling film. Tt is desired to know the temperature profile of the fluid as a function of y and z, near the wall. The partial differential equation that describes the temperature of the liquid for this problem is... [Pg.246]

In addition, the square of the surface order parameter is proportional to the chemical reactivity profile of the twin domain wall interface at the surface (Locherer et al. 1996, Houchmanzadeh et al.(1992). Intuitively, one would expect the chemical reactivity of the surface to be largest at the centre of the twin domain wall, falling off as the distance from the centre of the wall increases. Contrary to the expected behaviour, a more complex behaviour is found. The reactivity, a monotonic function of Q, is expected to fall off as the distance from the centre of the wall increases, but only after if has reached a maximum of a distance of - 3 IF from the centre of the domain wall. If such a structure is expected to show particle adsorption (e.g. in the MBE growth of thin films on twinned substrates) we expect the sticking coefficient to vary spatially. In one scenario, adsorption may be enhanced on either side of the wall while being reduced at the centre. The real space topography of the surface is determined by both sources of relaxation-twin domain wall and the surface. These are distinct and, when considered separately, the wall... [Pg.80]


See other pages where Falling films profiles is mentioned: [Pg.78]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.875]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.1128]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.380]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.442 ]




SEARCH



Falling

Falling film

Falling film velocity profile

Falls

Falls/falling

© 2024 chempedia.info