Failure rate models

Confidence Estimation for the Constant Failure Rate Model... 

BFR - Binomial Failure Rate (model of common cause system interactions). 

The part stress analysis prediction section contains failure rate models for a broad variety of parts used in electronic equipment. This method includes the effects of part quality factors and environmental factors. The tabulated values of the base failure rate are "cut off" at the design temperature and stress of the part. 

An example of a MIL-HDBK-217 failure rate model for a simple semiconductor... 

Modelling of the failure type of class (2) requires one to determine the expected frequency of the shock events and the corresponding conditional probabilities of component failures caused by them. The binomial failure rate model (BFR) is the best known model of this class. For its application observed CCF events are used to calculate the parameter of the binomial distribution [u in Eq. (9.36)]. This then enables one to determine the probabilities of failure combinations (e.g. three-out-of four redundant components) including for combinations which have not been observed. 

The maintenance of a system usually consists of several repairs that may not yield an as-good-as new condition but restore it somewhere between that perfect state and the one presented just previous to the failure, the so-called as-had-as old . This is known as imperfect repair. (Finkelstein 2008) is devoted to the failure rate modeling and focuses on reliability applications with a specific chapter dealing with imperfect repair. 

Finkelstein, M. (2008). Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk. Springer. 

This paper is thus organized as follows. In the next section, our assiunptions on the failure rate modeling and the inclusion of effective age in the failure density will be presented. Section 3 is then devoted to the adaptation of effective age models to account for the concepts of elasticity and inescapability of aging that were introduced here above. The proposed model for imperfect maintenance is next illustrated on a numerical apphcation. Some concluding remarks and perspectives are finally provided. 

If it can be demonstrated that an SIF device (e.g., a block valve) has dominant time-based failure mechanisms (i.e., they wear out), the random failure rate model can lead to erroneous conclusions and practices. For example, in calculating test intervals, a random model may lead to testing more frequently than actually required during the early life of the device and testing too infrequently during the later wear-out phase. Owners/operators should be aware that reliability models (e.g., Weibull) are available that divide failures into infant mortality, random, and wear-out modes. This guideline assumes failures are random. 

The device is not wearing out. The most prosaic example is the engineer s coffee mug. It fails by catastrophe (if we drop it), otherwise it is immortal. A constant failure rate model is often used for mathematical convenience when the wear out rate is small. This appears to be accurate for high-quality solid-state electronic devices during most of their useful life. 

Failure rate model. Ageing and imperfect maintenance incorporation... 

Another interesting axis concerns the estimation of the three parameters of the Atwood model. The proposed Monte-Carlo simulation approach for the estimation of these parameters has been validated by an analytical approach. This Monte-Carlo simulation approach could be used to revisit the assumptions supporting the Binomial Failure Rate model underlying the Atwood model. 

NSWC-94/L07 - Handbook of Reliability Prediction Procedures for Mechanical Equipment. This handbook presents a unique approach for prediction of mechanical component reliability by presenting failure rate models for fundamental classes of mechanical components. 

To use quantitative rehability prediction methods wisely, one should be aware of their limitations. Like aU engineering models, the failure rate models are approximations to reality. The failure rate models are based on the best field data that could be obtained for a wide variety of parts and systems this data is then analysed and massaged, with many simplifying assumptions thrown in, to create usable models. Then, when the model is used, more assumptions are made for the design parameters entered, such as stress and temperature. 

The handbook includes a series of empirical failure rate models developed using historical piece part failure data for a wide array of component types. There are models for virtually all electrical/ electronic parts and a number of electromechanical parts as well. All models predict reliability in terms of failures per million operating hours and assume an exponential distribution (constant failure rate), which allows the addition of failure rates to determine higher assembly reliability. The handbook contains two prediction approaches, the parts stress technique and the parts count technique, and covers 14 separate operational environments, such as ground fixed, airborne inhabited, etc. 

Examples of the specific mechanical devices addressed by the document include belts, springs, bearings, seals, brakes, slider-crank mechanisms and clutches. Failure rate models include factors that are known to impact the reliability of the components. 

---