Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Factors solvent composition

The results are given in Table 6.2. In this table on the left hand side the settings of the control factors (solvent composition) are given and on the upper site settings of the noise factors (temperature and relative humidity). Each of the combinations of control factor and noise factor settings results in one resolution. The signal-to-noise ratio S/N) summarizes the effect of noise factors for each of the control factors. [Pg.243]

Drift consists of base line perturbations that have a frequency that is significantly larger than that of the eluted peak. Drift is almost always due to either changes in ambient temperature, changes in solvent composition, or changes in flow rate. All these factors are easily constrained by careful control of the operating parameters of the chromatograph. [Pg.163]

There are two major factors that influehce retention volume measurement and they are temperature and solvent composition. In order to measure retention volume with adequate precision it is necessary to know the relationship between retention time and temperature so that the control limits of the column temperature can be specified. [Pg.260]

In particular, rotaxane dendrimers capable of reversible binding of ring and rod components, such as Type II, pseudorotaxane-terminated dendrimers, can be reversibly controlled by external stimuli, such as the solvent composition, temperature, and pH, to change their structure and properties. This has profound implications in diverse applications, for instance in the controlled drug release. A trapped guest molecule within a closed dendrimeric host system can be unleashed in a controlled manner by manipulating these external factors. In the type III-B rotaxane dendrimers, external stimuli can result in perturbations of the interlocked mechanical bonds. This behavior can be gainfully exploited to construct controlled molecular machines. [Pg.138]

Some kinds of chromatography require relatively little optimization. In gel permeation chromatography, for example, once the pore size of the support and number of columns is selected, it is only rarely necessary to examine in depth factors such as solvent composition, temperature, and flow rate. Optimization of affinity chromatography is similarly straightforward. In RPLC or IEC, however, retention is a complex and sensitive function of mobile phase composition column type, efficiency, and length flow rate gradient rate and temperature. [Pg.32]

Much LC-MS work is carried out in a qualitative or semi-quantitative mode. Development of quantitative LC-MS procedures for polymer/additive analysis is gaining attention. When accurate quantitation is necessary, it is important to understand in depth the experimental factors which influence the quantitative response of the entire LC-MS system. These factors, which include solvent composition, solvent flow-rate, and the presence of co-eluting species, exert a major influence on analyte mass transport and ionisation efficiency. Analyte responses in MS procedures can be significantly affected by the nature of the organic modifier used in the RPLC... [Pg.512]

The structures of sol-gel-derived inorganic polymers evolve continually as products of successive hydrolysis, condensation and restructuring (reverse of Equations 1-3) reactions. Therefore, to understand structural evolution in detail, we must understand the physical and chemical mechanisms which control the sequence and pattern of these reactions during gelation, drying, and consolidation. Although it is known that gel structure is affected by many factors including catalytic conditions, solvent composition and water to alkoxide ratio (13-141, we will show that many of the observed trends can be explained on the basis of the stability of the M-O-M condensation product in its synthesis environment. [Pg.318]

Where a, b, and c = van Deemter coefficients, dp = particle size of column, L = column length, Dm = diffusion coefficients of analytes, t = column dead time (depends on flow rate F), tg= gradient time (determines analysis time via tA = tg + t0), Ac = difference in concentrations of the organic modifier at the end and the beginning of the gradient (a continuous linear gradient is assumed), and B = slope of the linear relationship between the logarithm of the retention factor and the solvent composition. [Pg.97]

Common to all or most solvent extraction operations in the mining industry is the problem of stable formation of cruds. The crud can constitute a major solvent loss to a circuit and thereby adversely alfect the operating costs. Because there can be many causes of crud formation, each plant may have a crud problem unique to that operation. Factors such as ore type, solution composition, solvent composition, presence of other organic constituents, design and type of agitation all can adversely alfect the chemical and physical operation of the solvent extraction circuit and result in crud formation [32-34]. [Pg.317]

Tzeng et al studied the SCCO2 extractions with addition of 16.25% ethyl alcohol as a co-solvent to obtain scopoletin and artemisinin (1) from A. annua. A two-factor central composite experimental design was adopted to determine the optimal extraction conditions. Two-hour ethanol-modified SCCO2 extractions was more efficient than 16 h-Soxldet hexane extraction to provide pure artemisinin (1). ... [Pg.317]

The solvent composition affects not only the hysteresis or history dependence of the viscosity, but also its magnitude and temperature dependence. The viscosity was 10% higher using pure MeOH as the solvent than when a 1 1 MIBK/MeOH mixture was used. However, the 9 1 solvent mixture produces the highest solution viscosity by more than a factor of four. (A solution using a 19 1 MIBK/MeOH solvent mixture was so viscous it would barely flow in the flask in which it was prepared.) The apparent activation energy for flow... [Pg.68]

This crude analysis is based on the behavior postulated by the Born equation. However, ion-pair formation equilibrium constants have been observed to deviate ma edly from that behavior (22/ -222)1 Oakenful, and Fenwick (222) found a maximum in the ion-pair formation constants of several alkylamines with carboxylic acids when determined at various methanol-water solvent compositions as shown by their data in Fig. 54. The results demonstrate that in this system the stability constant decreases with increasing organic solvent concentration above a.critical value which yields maximum stability. The authors suggested that this was due to a weakening of hydrophobic interactions between the ion-pair forming species by increased alcohol concentrations. In practice the effect of added organic solvent has been either to decrease the retention factor or to have virtually no effect. [Pg.303]

It is important to point out that the distribution of the charges, and therefore the final signal response, is strongly influenced by several factors that depend both on the nature of the solution (pH, solvent composition, additives...) and on instrumental conditions [12-25]. [Pg.236]

This equation relates a so-called improvement factor, the logarithm of the ratio of relative volatility with and without salt present, to the salt concentration in the liquid phase under the condition of fixed mixed-solvent composition, by a salt effect parameter k. Usually, the added salt lowers the volatility of both components in the liquid phase. If the extent of this lowering is different for... [Pg.106]

It will be shown later that for the two solvent systems most thoroughly studied (and others besides), even though these show pronounced deviations from ideality, that the first term on the right-hand side of Equation 59 is a constant independent of solvent composition. Thus the second term of Equation 59 must be effectively zero, and compensation of activity coefficient factors must occur. [Pg.166]

One can interpret the trends in bH and bS in Figures 1-8 in terms of solvation of the reactants or products. Negative values of bH are a possible indication that the products in the reaction are more strongly solvated in solvent S than they are in water. Negative bH values also might indicate that reactants in the reaction are less strongly solvated in solvent S than in water. Conversely, positive values of bH are a possible indication that products are less solvated in solvent S than in water or that reactants are more solvated in solvent S than in water. Another possible factor in the interpretation of bH vs. solvent composition data is the possibility of large contributions of solvent-solvent interactions. [Pg.275]

Fig. 2. Phase transition of gels undergo in a solvent by changing one or some of the environmental factors, such as temperature, solvent composition, pH, etc... Fig. 2. Phase transition of gels undergo in a solvent by changing one or some of the environmental factors, such as temperature, solvent composition, pH, etc...
Refractive index detectors are useless in gradient elution because it is impossible to match exactly the sample and the reference while the solvent composition is changing. Refractive index detectors are sensitive to changes in pressure and temperature (—0.01 °C). Because of their low sensitivity, refractive index detectors are not useful for trace analysis. They also have a small linear range, spanning only a factor of 500 in solute concentration. The primary appeal of this detector is its nearly universal response to all solutes, including those that have little ultraviolet absorption. [Pg.573]


See other pages where Factors solvent composition is mentioned: [Pg.65]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.584]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.172 , Pg.174 ]




SEARCH



Compositional factor

Solvent composition

© 2024 chempedia.info