Central composite design experimental

For this reason one prefers to apply an experimental design. In the literature a number of different designs are described, such as saturated fractional factorial designs and Plackett-Burman designs, full and fractional factorial designs, central composite designs and Box-Behnken designs [5]. 

This experiment examines the effect of reaction time, temperature, and mole ratio of reactants on the synthetic yield of acetylferrocene by a Eriedel-Crafts acylation of ferrocene. A central composite experimental design is used to find the optimum conditions, but the experiment could be modified to use a factorial design. 

The experimental designs discussed in Chapters 24-26 for optimization can be used also for finding the product composition or processing condition that is optimal in terms of sensory properties. In particular, central composite designs and mixture designs are much used. The analysis of the sensory response is usually in the form of a fully quadratic function of the experimental factors. The sensory response itself may be the mean score of a panel of trained panellists. One may consider such a trained panel as a sensitive instrument to measure the perceived intensity useful in describing the sensory characteristics of a food product. 

This model is capable of estimating both linear and non-linear effects observed experimentally. Hence, it can also be used for optimization of the desired response with respect to the variables of the system. Two popular response surface designs are central composite designs and Box-Behnken designs. Box-Behnken designs were not employed in the experimental research described here and will therefore not be discussed further, but more information on Box-Behnken designs can be obtained from reference [15]. 

Central composite design, commercial experimental design software compared, 8 398t... 

Figure 12.12 Factor combinations for a central composite experimental design in two-dimensional factor space.

Replication is often included in central composite designs. If the response surface is thought to be reasonably homoscedastic, only one of the factor combinations (commonly the center point) need be replicated, usually three or four times to provide sufficient degrees of freedom for s. If the response surface is thought to be heteroscedastic, the replicates can be spread over the response surface to obtain an average purely experimental uncertainty. 

Full second-order polynomial models used with central composite experimental designs are very powerful tools for approximating the true behavior of many systems. However, the interpretation of the large number of estimated parameters in multifactor systems is not always straightforward. As an example, the parameter estimates of the coded and uncoded models in the previous section are quite different, even though the two models describe essentially the same response surface (see Equations 12.63 and 12.64). It is difficult to see this similarity by simple inspection of the two equations. Fortunately, canonical analysis is a mathematical technique that can be applied to full second-order polynomial models to reveal the essential features of the response surface and allow a simpler understanding of the factor effects and their interactions. 

The lower left panel in Figure 13.2 shows the central composite design in the two factors X, and X2. The factor domain extends from -5 to +5 in each factor dimension. The coordinate axes in this panel are rotated 45° to correspond to the orientation of the axes in the panel above. Each black dot represents a distinctly different factor combination, or design point. The pattern of dots shows a central composite design centered at (Xj = 0, Xj = 0). The factorial points are located 2 units from the center. The star points are located 4 units from the center. The three concentric circles indicate that the center point has been replicated a total of four times. The experimental design matrix is... 

Figure 13.3 shows a similar set of four panels for a slightly different central composite design. The lower left panel shows the placement of experiments in factor space (i.e., it shows the experimental design). The upper left panel shows the normalized uncertainty as a function of factors x, and x. The upper right panel shows the normalized information as a function of factors x, and Xj. The lower right panel plots normalized information as a function of factor x, for X2 = -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, and 0. The experimental design matrix is... 

Figure 13.4 shows four panels for still another central composite design. The lower left panel shows the experimental design itself. The upper left panel shows the normalized uncertainty associated with this design. The upper right panel shows the... 

Figure 13.5 shows still another central composite design. The experimental design matrix is... 

The rotatable central composite design in Figure 13.7 is related to the rotatable central composite design in Figure 13.3 through expansion by a factor of V2 the square points expand from 2 to 2 2 from the center the star points expand from 2 2 to 4 from the center. The experimental design matrix is... 

Figure 12.4 The spatial representations of four different types of experimental designs that are useful for process analyzer calibration (A) full-factorial, (B) Box-Behnken, (C) face-centered cube, and (D) central composite.

Tzeng et al studied the SCCO2 extractions with addition of 16.25% ethyl alcohol as a co-solvent to obtain scopoletin and artemisinin (1) from A. annua. A two-factor central composite experimental design was adopted to determine the optimal extraction conditions. Two-hour ethanol-modified SCCO2 extractions was more efficient than 16 h-Soxldet hexane extraction to provide pure artemisinin (1). ... 

If the F-test is significant then there is evidence of a quadratic effect due to at least one of the variables. With the present design, however, the investigator will not be able to determine which of the variables has a quadratic effect on the response. Additional experimentation, perhaps by augmenting the current design with some star points to construct a central composite design (see section on central composite designs below), will need to be conducted to fully explore the nature of the quadratic response surface. 

In general the cube portion might be replicated times and the star portion might be replicated times. Also, it might be possible to use a fractional factorial design of resolution less than V if the experimenter is prepared to assume that certain interactions are negligible. A central composite design in four variables is shown in Table 2.6. In this table, runs 1-16 are the cube portion, runs 17-24 are the star portion, and runs 25-27 are the center points. 

As was mentioned above for central composite designs, the experimenter can modify these designs if they believe that certain two-factor interactions can be assumed negligible. Box and Jones [20,21] show how this can be done to yield what they call a modified Box-Behnken design that requires fewer runs than the standard Box-Behnken design. 

---