Coefficient response

In principle, the step-response coefficients can be determined from the output response to a step change in the input. A typical response to a unit step change in input u is shown in Fig. 8-43. The step response coefficients are simply the values of the output variable at the samphng instants, after the initial value y(0) has been subtracted. Theoretically, they can be determined from a single-step response, but, in practice, a number of bump tests are required to compensate for unanticipated disturbances, process nonhnearities, and noisy measurements. 

Implementation Issues A critical factor in the successful application of any model-based technique is the availability of a suitaole dynamic model. In typical MPC applications, an empirical model is identified from data acquired during extensive plant tests. The experiments generally consist of a series of bump tests in the manipulated variables. Typically, the manipulated variables are adjusted one at a time and the plant tests require a period of one to three weeks. The step or impulse response coefficients are then calculated using linear-regression techniques such as least-sqiiares methods. However, details concerning the procedures utihzed in the plant tests and subsequent model identification are considered to be proprietary information. The scaling and conditioning of plant data for use in model identification and control calculations can be key factors in the success of the apphcation. 

The prediction step for PLS is also slightly different than for PCR. It is also done on a rank-by-rank basis using pairs of special and concentration factors. For each component, the projection of the unknown spectrum onto the first spectral factor is scaled by a response coefficient to become a corresponding projection on the first concentration factor. This yields the contribution to the total concentration for that component that is captured by the first pair of spectral and concentration factors. We then repeat the process for the second pair of factors, adding its concentration contribution to the contribution from the first pair of factors. We continue summing the contributions from each successive factor pair until all of the factors in the basis space have been used. 

Equation (86) describes the effect of a perturbation in parameters on the state variables S. The equation may be summarized as Rs = Csn, with Rs denoting the response coefficient [96] and... 

The coefficients LgR are Onsager s hnear-response coefficients. The other and so on, characterize the nonlinear response of the... 

Furthermore, the fourth-order response coefficients are given by... 

For a lucid account of the kinetics of multi-enzyme systems, the reader should consult Cornish-Bowden who defines such related parameters as flux control coefficients, summation relationships, and response coefficients. 

The best results in evaluating coating control units are achieved with ITAE. There are overshoots, but the reaction is fast and the ripple time short. Controller setting conditions have been worked up for all integral evaluation criteria just mentioned so as to minimize the related deviations. With a manual input as well as vi/ith experimental determination of the process response coefficients, the ideal PID coefficients for the ITAE evaluation can easily be calculated from equations 6.13,6.14 and 6.15 ... 

The Response Coefficient Expresses the Effect of an Outside Controller on Flux through a Pathway... 

Finally, the effect of controllers outside the pathway itself (that is, not metabolites) can be measured and expressed as the response coefficient, R. The change in flux through the pathway is measured for changes in the concentration of the controlling parameter P, and R is defined in a form analogous to that... 

The response coefficient, R, is the expression for the experimentally determined change in flux through a pathway in response to a regulatory hormone or second messenger. It is a function of C and e R = C e. 

The method of internal normalisation was chosen to determine the mass composition of a sample comprising a mixture of four esters of butanoic acid. To this end, a reference solution containing known % masses of these esters led to the following relative values of the response coefficients of the butanoates of methyl (ME), of ethyl (EE), and of propyl (PE), all three in ratio with butyl-butanoate (BE). 

To calculate the relative response coefficient we will take for example the solution containing 400ng/ml of cyclosporin A ... 

Laplace transform variable Search direction Step response coefficient Time... 

We usually think of van der Waals forces in terms of attraction or repulsion based on differences in polarizability. What if materials are anisotropic, for example, bire-fringent with different polarizabilities in different directions Imagine that substance A has a principal optical axis pointing parallel to the interface between A and m, that is, there is a dielectric response coefficient e parallel to the interface but a permittivity in directions perpendicular to the principal axis (see Fig. LI.20). 

---