Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

External quantum state

The incident monochromatic photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE), also called external quantum efficiency, is defined as the number of electrons generated by light in the external circuit divided by the number of incident photons as a function of excitation wavelength. It is expressed in Equation (7).29 In most cases, the photoaction spectrum overlaps with the absorption spectrum of the sensitizer adsorbed on the semiconductor surface. A high IPCE is a prerequisite for high-power photovoltaic applications, which depends on the sensitizer photon absorption, excited state electron injection, and electron transport to the terminals ... [Pg.723]

While the external quantum efficiency of PS reported for solid-state contacts is usually low, wet contacts are found to give high EL efficiencies at low applied bias under anodic [Vi2, Itl, Ge2, Ha7] as well as cathodic conditions [Bsl]. An example of bright EL from a micro PS sample in acetic acid under anodic bias is shown... [Pg.148]

The external quantum efficiency of the EL from PS-based devices has been increased from low initial values of 0.001% [Ko9] to values close to 1% [Ni4, La6, Co5]. This, however, is still about one order of magnitude smaller than the maximum quantum efficiency of state-of-the-art LEDs based on III-V semiconductor heterostructures. [Pg.231]

In quantum states with n > 1, quantum number / assumes different values for instance, for n = 3, / = 0, 1, 2. When / is equal to or greater than 1, several independent wave functions exist (21 + 1). An electron of the second level, sub-level p, can occupy three 2p orbitals of the same energy, described by three distinct wave functions. These orbitals, which, in the absence of external perturbation, rigorously have the same energy, are called atomic degenerate orbitals (ADs). [Pg.65]

An attractor does not necessarily correspond to a confined state. By taking the limit where the external potential tends to zero, with zero -kinetic energy, equation (6) with Q replaced by has the limit of an interacting n free-electron state system. The system does not dissociate into fragments by manipulations of the PCB. The limit is one of the free electron quantum states. This is a positive... [Pg.186]

No one of the equations introduced here are defined as in the standard Bom-Oppenheimer approach. The reason is that electronic base functions that depend parametrically on the geometry of the sources of external potential are not used. The concept of a quantum state with parametric dependence is different. This latter is a linear superposition the other are objects gathered in column vectors. [Pg.193]

The underlying issue is broader Coherent control was originally conceived for closed systems, and it is a priori unclear to what extent it is applicable to open quantum systems, that is, systems embedded in their ubiquitous environment and subject to omnipresent decoherence effects. These may have different physical origins, such as the coupling of the system to an external environment (bath), noise in the classical fields controlling the system, or population leakage out of a relevant system subspace. Their consequence is always a deviation of the quantum-state evolution (error) with respect to the unitary evolution expected... [Pg.137]

Coherent excitation of quantum systems by external fields is a versatile and powerful tool for application in quantum control. In particular, adiabatic evolution has been widely used to produce population transfer between discrete quantum states. Eor two states the control is by means of a varying detuning (a chirp), while for three states the change is induced, for example, by a pair of pulses, offset in time, that implement stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) [1-3]. STIRAP produces complete population transfer between the two end states 11) and 3) of a chain linked by two fields. In the adiabatic limit, the process places no temporary population in the middle state 2), even though the two driving fields - pump and Stokes-may be on exact resonance with their respective transitions, 1) 2)and... [Pg.219]

Fig. 4. Possible orientations of die total angular momentum vector i relative to the direction of an externally applied magnetic field B and the magnitudes of the associated magnetic quantum state vectors my... Fig. 4. Possible orientations of die total angular momentum vector i relative to the direction of an externally applied magnetic field B and the magnitudes of the associated magnetic quantum state vectors my...
In the second case, reading eq.(26), it is necessary that at least one of the Q-space states has the same parity as the operator p. Then, in (26) there may be a non-zero off-diagonal element connecting the ingoing to the outgoing channels. This state is called here a transition state (TS) and the coordinates of the stationary arrangement of external Coulomb sources a°TS (or otTS) is defined as a transition state structure (TSS). The TSS is a fundamental electronic property, while the quantum states of the TS include translational and rovibrational states with their characteristic density of states. [Pg.38]

For example, a spin- /2 nucleus can be viewed as having two quantum states one with the spin axis at a 45° angle to the external magnetic field and one with the spin axis at a 135° angle to the external field. A spin-1 nucleus can be viewed as having three possible states 45°, 90°, and 135°. In this book we will be concerned primarily with spin- /2 nuclei. [Pg.30]

The elementary constituents of a material substrate are fixed. But, the material system is not represented by a base state in the sense that it does not occupy such state. A quantum state indicates us all possible responses to external probes that such system may show. The two instances are noncom-mensurate one belongs to real space (material system) and the other is an element of Hilbert space (quantum state). [Pg.52]

The orthodox and standard quantum measurement theory uses a probability density view focused on the particle conception. The physical nature of the interaction that may lead to an event (click) is not central. Generally, it is true that a click will be eliciting the quantum state, but due to external factors, a click can be related to noise or any source of systematic error (lousy detectors) from the QM viewpoint developed here such events have no direct QM-related cause see Ref. [17], The probabilities cannot be primary. They can be useful as actually they are. One thing is sure the clicks do have a cause. But causality is a concept more related to a particle description it belongs to classical physics. [Pg.70]

Any quantum system can be associated to an I-frame thereby, internal and "external" (I-frame) quantum states can be determined or at least observed as done in astronomy. Probing (measuring) a quantum system breaks Hilbert space-time evolution thereby preparing a new quantum state. This latter can be used to detect the result due to probing. See Ref. [29] for an illustration. Gravitation is a prototype of classical effects. From neutron interference spectroscopy gravitation effects on quantum states are well documented. [Pg.102]


See other pages where External quantum state is mentioned: [Pg.53]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.416]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.53 ]




SEARCH



Quantum external

Quantum states

© 2024 chempedia.info