Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experimental data evaluation methodology

Following this methodology the mutual solubility of atoms-components was evaluated in many (over a thousand) simple and complex systems. The calculation results agree with reference and experimental data. [Pg.109]

To address these limitations to the commercial evaluation and implementation of C02 as a substitute solvent, we (1) present a methodology to measure and model high-pressure phase behavior of C02-based reaction systems using minimal experimental data and (2) present a new computational technique for high-pressure phase equilibrium calculations that provides a guarantee of the correct solution to the flash problem. [Pg.5]

In summary, all semi-empirical MO methods discussed above have their strong and weak points, which unfortunately are not always known prior to the actual calculation. As with all evaluations of theoretical methodologies, making contact and comparing with experimental data is always a wise thing to do. It should be borne in mind that quantum chemical calculations are most often done on the isolated molecule, that is, in absolute vaeuum. More often than not, the results of these calculations are compared to the results obtained from X-ray (crystalline state) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data (liquid state), from which it follows that discrepancies between theoretieal and experimental results are not necessarily a reflection on the validity and aeeuracy of the former. [Pg.111]

The BET theory is commonly used to determine the surface area of porous solids by low temperature ad/desorption experiments with gases - mostly with Nj (at —196 °C) - by the following methodology [62] The gas pressure (pj) is increased stepwise until the saturation vapor pressure is reached, and the corresponding amount of the adsorbed gas (V ) is measured. For the evaluation of the experimental data, Eq. (6.43) is applied in the linear form... [Pg.132]

An easy method to estimate rate constants in complex kinetic models is proposed. This method reduces the number of parameters to be estimated simultaneously. A 5-lump kinetic model for the catalytic cracking process was selected in order to tqiply the proposed methodology. Experimental data obtained in a MAT using three gas oils and a commorcial equilibrium catalyst unit were used to evaluate the rate constants. [Pg.611]

The desired objective is to use sensitive methods to detect end-points at low levels of oxidation relevant to flavor deterioration. To evaluate the oxidative or flavor stability of food lipids, it is critical to establish how the experimental data are influenced by the methodology used and the nature of the sample materials. No short cut approach can be used to food stability tests because it is influenced by complex phenomena. The stability of each system has to be researched under various test conditions. The following factors must be considered ... [Pg.182]

The Heavy Gas Dispersion Expert Group (HGDEG), which was set up by the European Commission s Model Evaluation Group, developed an evaluation methodology based on the REDIPHEM activities and tested it through a small evaluation exercise. Cole and Wicks (1995) give details and experience of this limited exercise. The objective was to develop a protocol for evaluation of the models and make an overview of the experimental data available for such an evaluation. It was concluded that a more extensive evaluation exercise is needed and that the scientific evaluation requires more attention (Mercer et al., 1998 Duijm et al, 1997). [Pg.442]

It is natural that people should want to calculate properties of systems that are too complex to be treated by the ab initio techniques of the day, and so approximation procedures have grown up alongside ab initio methodology. These approximations neglect certain terms and adopt simply evaluated formulas for others. To achieve useful accuracy, at least some of the terms retained must be parameterized, with the parameters determined all, or in part, from experimental data. This has given rise to a variety of so-called semiempirical methods. [Pg.87]

Statistical design of experiment (DOE) is an efficient procedure for finding the optimum molar ratio for copolymers having the best property profile. Based on the concepts of response-surface (RS) methodology, developed by Box and Wilson [11], there are four models or polynominals (Table III) useful in our study. For three components, in general, if there are seven to nine experimental data points, the linear, quadratic and special cubic will be applicable for use in predictions. If there are ten or more data points, the full cubic model will also be applicable. At the start of the effort, one prepares a fair number of copolymers with different AA IA NVP ratios and tests for a property one wishes to optimize, with the data fit to the statistical models. Based on the models, new copolymers, with different ratios, are prepared and tested for the desired property improvement. This type procedure significantly lowers the number of copolymers that needs to be prepared and evaluated, in order to identify the ratio needed to give the best mechanical property. [Pg.228]

During the operation of technological equipment, it is necessary, in order to evaluate its actual technical conditions, to collect data that characterize operational conditions, that is, to apply technical diagnostic methods in alignment with the latest methods of experimental measurement. Furthermore, it is important to verify the data measured as well as the data processing methodology to eliminate their irrelevance to the monitored subject. [Pg.162]

Chapter 8 - Spatial-energy characteristics of many molecules and free radicals are obtained. The possibilities of applying the P-parameter methodology to structural interactions with free radicals and photosynthesis energetics evaluation are discussed. The satisfactory compliance of calculations with experimental and reference data on main photosynthesis stages is shown. [Pg.14]


See other pages where Experimental data evaluation methodology is mentioned: [Pg.695]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.1337]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.1337]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.63]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.965 ]




SEARCH



Data evaluation

Evaluation experimental

Evaluation methodology

Experimental data evaluation

Experimental methodology

© 2024 chempedia.info