Evaporation, classical

There are two approaches to explain physical mechanism of the phenomenon. The first model is based on the existence of the difference between the saturated vapor pressures above two menisci in dead-end capillary. It results in the evaporation of a liquid from the meniscus of smaller curvature ( classical capillary imbibition) and the condensation of its vapor upon the meniscus of larger curvature originally existed due to capillary condensation. 

At first we tried to explain the phenomenon on the base of the existence of the difference between the saturated vapor pressures above two menisci in dead-end capillary [12]. It results in the evaporation of a liquid from the meniscus of smaller curvature ( classical capillary imbibition) and the condensation of its vapor upon the meniscus of larger curvature originally existed due to capillary condensation. We worked out the mathematical description of both gas-vapor diffusion and evaporation-condensation processes in cone s channel. Solving the system of differential equations for evaporation-condensation processes, we ve derived the formula for the dependence of top s (or inner) liquid column growth on time. But the calculated curves for the kinetics of inner column s length are 1-2 orders of magnitude smaller than the experimental ones [12]. 

Figure C2.11.6. The classic two-particle sintering model illustrating material transport and neck growtli at tire particle contacts resulting in coarsening (left) and densification (right) during sintering. Surface diffusion (a), evaporation-condensation (b), and volume diffusion (c) contribute to coarsening, while volume diffusion (d), grain boundary diffusion (e), solution-precipitation (f), and dislocation motion (g) contribute to densification.

Wohler s classical synthesis of urea from ammonium cyanate may be carried out by evaporating solutions of sodium cyanate and ammonium sulphate ... 

Qualitative Analysis. Nitric acid may be detected by the classical brown-ring test, the copper-turnings test, the reduction of nitrate to ammonia by active metal or alloy, or the nitrogen precipitation test. Nitrous acid or nitrites interfere with most of these tests, but such interference may be eliminated by acidifying with sulfuric acid, adding ammonium sulfate crystals, and evaporating to alow volume. 

Similar to IFP s Dimersol process, the Alphabutol process uses a Ziegler-Natta type soluble catalyst based on a titanium complex, with triethyl aluminum as a co-catalyst. This soluble catalyst system avoids the isomerization of 1-butene to 2-butene and thus eliminates the need for removing the isomers from the 1-butene. The process is composed of four sections reaction, co-catalyst injection, catalyst removal, and distillation. Reaction takes place at 50—55°C and 2.4—2.8 MPa (350—400 psig) for 5—6 h. The catalyst is continuously fed to the reactor ethylene conversion is about 80—85% per pass with a selectivity to 1-butene of 93%. The catalyst is removed by vaporizing Hquid withdrawn from the reactor in two steps classical exchanger and thin-film evaporator. The purity of the butene produced with this technology is 99.90%. IFP has Hcensed this technology in areas where there is no local supply of 1-butene from other sources, such as Saudi Arabia and the Far East. 

In classic electro-thermal atomizer the process of formation of the analytical signal is combination of two processes the analyte supply (in the process of evaporation) and the analyte removal (by diffusion of the analyte from the atomizer). In double stage atomizer a very significant role plays the process of conductive transfer of the analyte form the evaporator to the atomizer itself and this makes the main and a principle difference of these devices. Additionally to the named difference arises the problem with optimization of the double stage atomizer as the amount of design pai ameters and possible combination of operation pai ameters significantly increases. 

In addition to diamond and amorphous films, nanostructural forms of carbon may also be formed from the vapour phase. Here, stabilisation is achieved by the formation of closed shell structures that obviate the need for surface heteroatoms to stabilise danghng bonds, as is the case for bulk crystals of diamond and graphite. The now-classical example of closed-shell stabilisation of carbon nanostructures is the formation of C o molecules and other Fullerenes by electric arc evaporation of graphite [38] (Section 2.4). 

Macchi et al. [9] made an extensive study of water injection cycles in their two classic papers and their results are worth a detailed study. Some of their calculations (for ISTIG, RWI and HAT) are reproduced in Figs. 6.18-6.20, all for surface intercooling (parallel calculations for evaporative intercooling are given in the original papers). 

The type of CSPs used have to fulfil the same requirements (resistance, loadabil-ity) as do classical chiral HPLC separations at preparative level [99], although different particle size silica supports are sometimes needed [10]. Again, to date the polysaccharide-derived CSPs have been the most studied in SMB systems, and a large number of racemic compounds have been successfully resolved in this way [95-98, 100-108]. Nevertheless, some applications can also be found with CSPs derived from polyacrylamides [11], Pirkle-type chiral selectors [10] and cyclodextrin derivatives [109]. A system to evaporate the collected fractions and to recover and recycle solvent is sometimes coupled to the SMB. In this context the application of the technique to gas can be advantageous in some cases because this part of the process can be omitted [109]. 

Promoters are usually added to a catalyst during catalyst preparation (classical or chemical promotion). Thus if they get somehow lost (evaporation) or deactivated during prolonged catalyst operation, this leads to significant catalyst deterioration. Their concentration cannot be controlled in situ, i.e. during catalyst operation. As we will see in this book one of the most important advantages of electrochemical promotion is that it permits direct in situ control of the amount of the promoter on the catalyst surface. 

Alivisatos and coworkers reported on the realization of an electrode structure scaled down to the level of a single Au nanocluster [24]. They combined optical lithography and angle evaporation techniques (see previous discussion of SET-device fabrication) to define a narrow gap of a few nanometers between two Au leads on a Si substrate. The Au leads were functionalized with hexane-1,6-dithiol, which binds linearly to the Au surface. 5.8 nm Au nanoclusters were immobilized from solution between the leads via the free dithiol end, which faces the solution. Slight current steps in the I U) characteristic at 77K were reflected by the resulting device (see Figure 8). By curve fitting to classical Coulomb blockade models, the resistances are 32 MQ and 2 G 2, respectively, and the junction... 

Bromomethyl-2,3-dimethoxy-7-methylquinoxaline (265) underwent a classical Sommelet reaction and incidental hydrolysis of the methoxy groups to give 7-methyl-2,3-dioxo-l,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-quinoxalinecarbaldehyde (266) (hexamethylenetetramine, CHCI3, 20 C -reflux, 30 min solid from evaporation, AcOH-fBO, reflux, 2h then HCI, reflux, 5 min 76%).46... 

Quite recently Raes (1985) applied the classical theory of homogenous nucleation originally developed by Bricard et al (1972) to atmospheres containing SO2, H2O and 218Po ions. Depending on the H2O and SO2 concentrations, ions could grow to a quasi-stable cluster which would evaporate upon electrical neutralization, or to a larger size which would survive neutralization. 

We will first describe classic cryogenic techniques in which either liquid 4He or 3He is evaporated (see e.g. ref [2]). In this case, an important practical aspect is the limitation in the consumption of cryogens, in particular of 4He which is expensive and sometimes not recovered. 

Steady-state mathematical models of single- and multiple-effect evaporators involving material and energy balances can be found in McCabe et al. (1993), Yannio-tis and Pilavachi (1996), and Esplugas and Mata (1983). The classical simplified optimization problem for evaporators (Schweyer, 1955) is to determine the most suitable number of effects given (1) an analytical expression for the fixed costs in terms of the number of effects n, and (2) the steam (variable) costs also in terms of n. Analytic differentiation yields an analytical solution for the optimal n, as shown here. 

---