Evacuation chamber

A simple form of apparatus is that in which a cooled condensing surface is supported a few cm. above a shallow, heated pool of liquid, and the whole is enclosed in a highly evacuated chamber (compare Fig. II, 26, 1) this offers the least hindrance to the flow of vapour from the evaporating to the condensing surface. The rate of distillation is then determined by the rate at which the liquid surface is able to produce vapour. When the evaporating... 

As a first stage, the stream of liquid from an HPLC eluant is passed through a narrow tube toward the LINC interface. Near the end of the tube, the liquid stream is injected with helium gas so that it leaves the end of the tube as a high-velocity spray of small drops of liquid mixed with helium. From there, the mixture enters an evacuation chamber (Figure 12.1). The formation of spray (nebulizing) is very similar to that occurring in the action of aerosol spray cans (see Chapter 19). 

The passage of drops of solvent (S) containing a solute (M) through the evacuation chamber, the exit nozzle, skimmers 1 and 2, and into the ion chamber. Molecules of solvent evaporate throughout this passage, causing the drops to get smaller until only solute molecules remain. 

The particle beam — after linear passage from the evacuation chamber nozzle, through the first and second skimmers, and into the end of the ion source — finally passes through a heated grid immediately before ionization. The heated grid has the effect of breaking up most of the residual small clusters, so residual solvent evaporates and a beam of solute molecules enters the ionization chamber. 

The best balance technique for high-speed flexible rotors is to balance them not in low-speed machines, but at their rated speed. This is not always possible in the shop therefore, it is often done in the field. New facilities are being built that can run a rotor in an evacuated chamber at running speeds in a shop. Figure 17-4 shows the evacuation chamber, and Figure 17-5 shows the control room. 

Figure 17-4. Evacuation chamber for a high-speed balancing rig. (Courtesy of Transamerica Delaval, Inc.)...

Ionization Chamber Method DSC directly sampled to an evacuated chamber, current measurement... 

Any liquid or even solid material always produces a gaseous phase in equilibrium with the denser phase. The pressure of the gaseous phase is called vapour pressure . The final vacuum in an evacuated chamber is often controlled by the vapour pressure of the most volatile material present in the system. 

Figure 28 Schematic representa- Figure 29 Changes in the OWG absorbance of PV2+(TFPB )2 tion of the OWG system for detect- thin films of various thickness during IPCT excitation ing photoinduced electrochromism (a) 10.0, (b) 40.4, (c) 64.9, (d) 955, and (e) 179.6 nm. of ultrathin films (S) in the evacuation chamber shown in an inset.

Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram of electron impact (El) source for mass spectrometry. The sample enters the evacuated chamber as a gas and is intersected by a beam of electrons released from the heated cathode and accelerated towards the positive anode at the top. The impact of the electrons atomizes and ionizes the sample, and the resulting positive ions are attracted towards the annular cathode on the right, passing through it and out of the source towards the mass selection device.

The ultracentrifuge is made up of an aluminium rotor several inches in diameter and it is rotated at high speed in an evacuated chamber. The solution to be centrifuged is kept in a small cell within the rotor near its periphery. The rotor can be driven electrically or by an oil or air turbine. 

However, this porosity takes into account all the open pores—even those that are not connected between each other, which are useless in fuel cell operation. Therefore, the effective porosity, which counts only the interconnected pores, is more critical when determining the optimal diffusion layer in a fuel cell. This porosity can be determined by using volume filtration techniques. For example, a porous sample is immersed in a liquid that does not enter inside the pores (e.g., mercury at low pressures) and then the total volume of the material can be determined. Next, the specimen is put inside a container of known volume that contains an inert gas, and the changed pressure is recorded. After this, a second evacuated chamber of known volume is connected to the system, and the new pressure is recorded. With these pressures and the ideal gas law, the volume of open pores and thus the effective porosity can be determined [195]. 

Recently, Tang and Munkelwitz (1991) applied a variation on this theme by determining very low vapor pressures of levitated droplets from data obtained at atmospheric pressure and in an evacuated chamber. In both cases they used data from the literature obtained at temperatures much higher than room temperature together with their new data to fit the constants in vapor pressure equations of the form... 

The first step of the process is performed in a separate, dedicated building. The drums of arsenic trioxide are opened in an air-evacuated chamber and automatically dumped into 50% caustic soda. A dust collection system is used. The drums are carefully washed with water, the washwater is added to the reaction mixture, and the dmms are crushed and sold as scrap metal. The intermediate sodium arsenite is obtained as a 25% solution and is stored in large tanks prior to further reaction. In the next step, the 25% sodium arsenite is treated with methyl chloride to produce the disodium salt DSMA (disodium methanearsenate, hexahydrate). This DSMA can be sold as a herbicide however, it is more generally converted to MSMA, which has more favorable application properties [8]. 

Evacuable chambers Ideally, one would like to be able to vary the pressure and temperature during environmental chamber runs in order to simulate various geographical locations, seasons, and meteorology and to establish the pressure and temperature dependencies of reactions. Varying the pressure and temperature also allows one to simulate the upper atmosphere (e.g., to study stratospheric and mesospheric chemistry). 

While glass reactors can be easily designed to include pressure and temperature control, they suffer from other limitations discussed earlier. In addition, the use of very large glass evacuable chambers at low pressures presents a potential safety problem. On the other hand, pressure and temperature are not easily controlled using collapsible reaction chambers. 

FIGURE 16.3 Schematic diagram of the evacuable chamber at the Air Pollution Research Center, University of California, Riverside. 

Figure 16.7 shows some typical concentration-time profiles for irradiation of a propene-NO mixture in the evacuable chamber of Fig. 16.3. The loss of the reactants, and the formation of the most commonly monitored secondary pollutants 03, PAN, and the oxygenates HCHO and CH3CHO are shown (Pitts et al., 1975).

Clearly, such adsorption-desorption processes on the surfaces of chambers potentially can have substantial effects on the observed levels of 03 and other trace pollutants and on their rates of formation. While such effects can be minimized using bake-out while pumping if the chamber is evacuable, relatively few smog chambers have such capabilities at present. Even for evacuable chambers, contamination from adsorption on, and desorption from, the walls occurs. How to correct the results for this and reliably extrapolate the data to real atmospheres remains problematical. 

FIGURE 16.13 Comparison of observed O, concentration-time profiles (O) in two different evacuable chambers to predicted profiles if the heterogeneous production of HONO (reaction (14)) does not occur (curve A) and if reaction (14) with photoenhancement does occur (curve B). Results in (a) are results from the chamber of Akimoto el al. (1985) and those in (b) are from the evacuable chamber in Fig. 16.3 (adapted from Sakamaki and Akimoto, 1988). 

Figure 16.13, for example, shows the concentration-time profiles for a run in the evacuable chamber shown in Fig. 16.3 and for one in the evacuable chamber of Akimoto et al. (1985). The calculation, which assumes no radical source, curve A, clearly underpredicts Oa by a large margin. However, inclusion of a photoenhanced production of HONO via reaction (14), curve B, matches the observations quite well (Sakamaki and Akimoto, 1988). 

---