Error analysis general

In addition to their descriptive fimctions, TA techniques provide a wide variety of information about the task that can be useful for error prediction and prevention. To this extent, there is a considerable overlap between Task Analysis and Human Error Analysis (HEA) techniques described later in this chapter. HEA methods generally take the result of TA as their starting point and examine what aspects of the task can contribute to human error, hr the context of human error reduction in the CPI, a combination of TA and HEA methods will be the most suitable form of analysis. 

Checklists generally take no account of the context in which the tasks are carried out. Some form of task analysis or error analysis may also be required to gain an insight into the overall task context. 

Uncertainty in Process Discriminants. Because processes operate over a continuum, data analysis generally produces distinguishing features that exist over a continuum. This is further compounded by noise and errors in the sensor measurements. Therefore, the discriminants developed to distinguish various process labels may overlap, resulting in uncertainty between data classes. As a result, it is impossible to define completely distinguishing criteria for the patterns. Thus, uncertainty must be addressed inherently. 

This is for univariate data what happens in the case of multivariate (multiwavelength) spectroscopic analysis. The same thing, only worse. To calculate the effects rigorously and quantitatively is an extremely difficult exercise for the multivariate case, because not only are the errors themselves are involved, but in addition the correlation stmcture of the data exacerbates the effects. Qualitatively we can note that, just as in the univariate case, the presence of error in the absorbance data will bias the coefficient(s) toward zero , to use the formal statistical description. In the multivariate case, however, each coefficient will be biased by different amounts, reflecting the different amounts of noise (or error, more generally) affecting the data at different wavelengths. As mentioned above, these... 

The model that utilized regression analysis was one that built upon previous work by the same authors [36,39]. In this case, the dataset was expanded to 125-129 drugs and the number of assessed descriptors increased to 210. Models for acidic and basic compounds were developed separately as well as a model using all compounds, and the advantages of analyzing acids and bases separately were minimal. Mean-fold errors were generally around 1.8. Descriptors that dominated the models included lipophilicity, fraction anionic or cationic, surface electrostatic potential, and parameters specific to aliphatic carbons and fluorine. 

Albarede, F. Provost, A. (1977). Petrological and geochemical mass balance an algorithm for least-squares fitting and general error analysis. Comp. Sci., 3, 309-26. 

First-order error analysis is a method for propagating uncertainty in the random parameters of a model into the model predictions using a fixed-form equation. This method is not a simulation like Monte Carlo but uses statistical theory to develop an equation that can easily be solved on a calculator. The method works well for linear models, but the accuracy of the method decreases as the model becomes more nonlinear. As a general rule, linear models that can be written down on a piece of paper work well with Ist-order error analysis. Complicated models that consist of a large number of pieced equations (like large exposure models) cannot be evaluated using Ist-order analysis. To use the technique, each partial differential equation of each random parameter with respect to the model must be solvable. 

The remaining errors in the data are usually described as random, their properties ultimately attributable to the nature of our physical world. Random errors do not lend themselves easily to quantitative correction. However, certain aspects of random error exhibit a consistency of behavior in repeated trials under the same experimental conditions, which allows more probable values of the data elements to be obtained by averaging processes. The behavior of random phenomena is common to all experimental data and has given rise to the well-known branch of mathematical analysis known as statistics. Statistical quantities, unfortunately, cannot be assigned definite values. They can only be discussed in terms of probabilities. Because (random) uncertainties exist in all experimentally measured quantities, a restoration with all the possible constraints applied cannot yield an exact solution. The best that may be obtained in practice is the solution that is most probable. Actually, whether an error is classified as systematic or random depends on the extent of our knowledge of the data and the influences on them. All unaccounted errors are generally classified as part of the random component. Further knowledge determines many errors to be systematic that were previously classified as random. 

Error Analysis and Quantification of Uncertainty. The error associated with paleolimnological inferences must be understood. Two sources of error worthy of special attention are the predictive models (transfer functions) developed to infer chemistry and inferences generated by using those equations with fossil samples in sediment strata. Much of the following discussion is based on the pioneering work reviewed by Sachs et al. (35) and by Birks et al. (17, 22), among others. We emphasize error analysis here because it is not covered in detail in most of the general review articles cited earlier. 

Results of the enthalpy balance for this test show that the method of calculation cannot account for 1.5% of the total enthalpy input. This difference is small and may arise from the accuracy of the individual measurements and by the approximation used to calculate some of the quantities, as described above. A preliminary error analysis indicates an uncertainty of +3.356 for the heat balance calculation. The two methods for calculating the efficiency will agree only if the heat balance closes exactly. In general, when the... 

In flow analysis, random errors due to operator intervention are significantly reduced, and traditional glassware is less intensively used. Attention should however be paid to the possibility of systematic errors, which generally increase when a batch-wise analytical method is carried... 

Booksh KS, Kowalski BR, Error analysis of the generalized rank annihilation method, Journal of Chemometrics, 1994, 8, 45-63. 

The determinations of the amount of urea in the blood and fluids other than the urine are, owing to imperfections in the processes of analysis, not as accurate as could be desired, the error being generally a minus one. Some of the more prominent are given in the following table ... 

One of the most important aspect of allergen detection is sampling, followed by preparation of the sample for analysis. Generally, the distribution of the allergen as contaminant in the food product is extremely heterogeneous, and for this reason an incorrect sampling procedure, which is one of the main sources of error, may lead to poor-quality results. To guarantee the representativeness of the sample, it is necessary ... 

Let us summarize the general situation with regard to backward error analysis. Assume a smooth differential equation system... 

---