Equipment liquid mixing

The following factors must be taken into account when choosing equipment for mixing liquids ... 

As might be expected, the vapour phase may offer the controlling resistance to mass transfer in high pressure distillations. Values for tray efficiencies at elevated pressure are scarce [23, 24]. The prediction of tray efficiency may be approached in several ways. One way is to utilize field performance data taken for the same system in very similar equipment. Unfortunately such data are seldom available. When they are available, and can be judged as accurate and representative, they should be used as a basis for efficiency specification [25], Another way is to utilize laboratory-or pilot-plant efficiency data. For example a small laboratory-Oldershaw tray-column can be used with the same system. Of course, the results must be corrected for vapour-and liquid mixing effects to obtain overall tray efficiencies for large-scale design [26], Another approach is the use of empirical or fundamental mass-transfer models [27-30],... 

Multi-phase mixing is often seen in industries. In general, the distribution of not only the dispersed phase but also the continuous phase depends on the local position in the equipment in the case of a multi-phase operation such as gas-liquid mixing system, liquid-liquid mixing system, solid-liquid mixing system, and gas-liquid-solid mixing system. In order to evaluate the mixing state in such systems, both the dispersed phase and continuous phase should be considered. 

Many operations treat particle-liquid mixing in chemical industry. The first aim of solid-liquid mixing is to make a solid particle float. However, mixing performance of operations/equipment is not clear. Additionally, when many kinds of particles are involved, it is not known whether there is any difference in the mixedness between the following two cases the case where all particles are treated as a particle (two-phase mixing—particle and continuous liquid phase) and the case where every particle is treated individually (multiple-phase mixing—each particle and continuous liquid phase). Therefore, a solution to this unsolved problem is not imperative. 

Lubricants enable P ILE fine powders to be processed on commercial equipment. Liquids with a viscosity between 0.5 and 5 cP are preferred, although more viscous liquids are used occasionally. When selecting a lubricant, its ability to be incorporated easily into the blend and to vaporize completely and rapidly in a later processing step without leaving residues that would discolor the product or adversely affect its properties is important. The amounts of lubricant added are typically 16 to 19% of the total weight of the mix. 

In solutions, the most important physical factors that influence the solubility of ingredients are type of fluid, mixing equipment, and mixing operations. Generalized Newtonian fluids are ideal fluids for which the ratio of the shear rate to the shear stress is constant at a particular time. Unfortunately, in practice, usually liquid dosage forms and their ingredients are non-Newtonian fluids in which the ratio of the shear rate to the shear stress varies. As a result, non-Newtonian fluids may not have a well-defined viscosity [32],... 

---