Equality-constrained problems

Constrained Derivatives—Equality Constrained Problems Consider minimizing the objective function F written in terms of n variables z and subject to m equahty constraints h z) = 0, or... 

Equality Constrained Problems—Lagrange Multipliers Form a scalar function, called the Lagrange func tion, by adding each of the equality constraints multiplied by an arbitrary iTuiltipher to the objective func tion. 

V L is equal to the constrained derivatives for the problem, which should be zero at the solution to the problem. Also, these stationarity conditions very neatly provide the necessaiy conditions for optimality of an equality-constrained problem. 

Inequality Constrained Problems To solve inequality constrained problems, a strategy is needed that can decide which of the inequality constraints should be treated as equalities. Once that question is decided, a GRG type of approach can be used to solve the resulting equality constrained problem. Solving can be split into two phases phase 1, where the go is to find a point that is feasible with respec t to the inequality constraints and phase 2, where one seeks the optimum while maintaining feasibility. Phase 1 is often accomphshed by ignoring the objective function and using instead... 

The KTC are closely related to the classical Lagrange multiplier results for equality constrained problems. Form the Lagrangian... 

A great number of studies indicated that quadratic approximation methods, which are characterized by solving a sequence of quadratic subproblems recursively belong to the most efficient and reliable nonlinear programming algorithms presently available. This method combines the most efficient characteristics of different optimization techniques (see e.g, [19]). For equality constrained problems, the general nonlinear constrained optimization problem can be formulated by an... 

Equality- and Inequality-Constrained Problems—Kuhn-Tucker Multipliers Next a point is tested to see if it is an optimum one when there are inequality constraints. The problem is... 

Quadratic Fit for the Equality Constrained Case Next consider solving a problem of the form of Eq. (3-82). For each iteration k ... 

Alternatively p can be seen as a Lagrange multiplier introduced to solve the constrained problem minimize 0prior(x) subject to (/>ml(x) be equal to some... 

GRG Probably most robust of all three methods Versatile—especially good for unconstrained or linearly constrained problems but also works well for nonlinear constraints Once it reaches a feasible solution it remains feasible and then can be stopped at any stage with an improved solution Needs to satisfy equalities at each step of the algorithm... 

This technique, combined with Fenske shortcut calculations for generating initial estimates of temperature profiles and stage liquid or vapor flow rates, is a robust method that can solve a large percentage of different types of separation processes. The algorithm also has provision for handling inequality specifications (Brannock et al., 1977). For each inequality specification, an alternate equality specification is required to ensure a unique solution. In this manner, the so-called over-constrained problems may be solved since inequality specifications are not subject to degrees of freedom restrictions. 

In an attempt to avoid the ill-conditioning that occurs in the regular pentilty tuid bturier function methods, Hestenes (1969) and PoweU (1969) independently developed a multiplier method for solving nonhnearly constrained problems. This multiplier method was originally developed for equality constraints and involves optimizing a sequence of unconstrained augmented Lagrtuigitui functions. It was later extended to handle inequality constraints by Rockafellar (1973). 

Therefore, this constraint can be written in the form E[ifi(x, W)] s p- Problems with such probabilistic constraints are called chance constrained problems. Note that even if the function h(-, ) is continuous, the corresponding indicator function ) is discontinuous unless it is identically equal to zero or one. Because of that, it may be technically difficult to hemdle such a problem. 

When several equality constraints are to be applied, we introduce one multiplier for each. But in general, we should not introduce more constraints than there are initially independent variables. Doing so creates an over-constrained problem that usually has no solution. In some problems the Lagrange multiplier has a physical significance, but none appears to apply to the X in the simple problem above. 

There are many ways to solve this nonlinear equality-constrained optimization problem. One method is the quadratic model approximation [44]. The maximum entropy method can provide the least biased estimates on the basis of available information about the problems. The proven objectivity of the method relies on the fact that the solution is dictated purely by the experimental data and the nature of the problem, not by an arbitrarily introduced differential operator such as the ones may be found in the regularization method. 

Here we consider the augmented Lagrangian method, which converts the constrained problem into a sequence of imconstrained minimizations. We first treat equality constraints, and then extend the method to include inequality constraints. 

Iris type of constrained minimisation problem can be tackled using the method of Lagrange nultipliers. In this approach (see Section 1.10.5 for a brief introduction to Lagrange nultipliers) the derivative of the function to be minimised is added to the derivatives of he constraint(s) multiplied by a constant called a Lagrange multiplier. The sum is then et equal to zero. If the Lagrange multiplier for each of the orthonormality conditions is... 

Further Comments on General Programming.—This section will utilize ideas developed in linear programming. The use of Lagrange multipliers provides one method for solving constrained optimization problems in which the constraints are given as equalities. 

The specific explanation structure for the flowshop problem is given in Fig. 10. In the example we have assumed that the sufficient condition is satisfied by having all the end-times of x less than or equal to those of y. Thus the proof begins by selecting the appropriate variable set, and proceeds to prove that each variable is more loosely constrained in x than in y. The intersituational variables in the flowshop problem are the start-times of the next state. 

The above constrained parameter estimation problem becomes much more challenging if the location where the constraint must be satisfied, (xo,yo), is not known a priori. This situation arises naturally in the estimation of binary interaction parameters in cubic equations of state (see Chapter 14). Furthermore, the above development can be readily extended to several constraints by introducing an equal number of Lagrange multipliers. 

An approach to solving the inverse Fourier problem is to reconstruct a parametrized spin density based on axially symmetrical p orbitals (pz orbitals) centered on all the atoms of the molecule (wave function modeling). In the model which was actually used, the spin populations of corresponding atoms of A and B were constrained to be equal. The averaged populations thus refined are displayed in Table 2. Most of the spin density lies on the 01, N1 and N2 atoms. However, the agreement obtained between observed and calculated data (x2 = 2.1) indicates that this model is not completely satisfactory. 

An important class of the constrained optimization problems is one in which the objective function, equality constraints and inequality constraints are all linear. A linear function is one in which the dependent variables appear only to the first power. For example, a linear function of two variables x and x2 would be of the general form ... 

One method of handling just one or two linear or nonlinear equality constraints is to solve explicitly for one variable and eliminate that variable from the problem formulation. This is done by direct substitution in the objective function and constraint equations in the problem. In many problems elimination of a single equality constraint is often superior to an approach in which the constraint is retained and some constrained optimization procedure is executed. For example, suppose you want to minimize the following objective function that is subject to a single equality constraint... 

---