Substrates determination, enzymes

Bolster, J., HObel, W., Pappberger, A., Schmidt, H.-L., Fundamentals of Enzyme Substrate Determinations by Fiber Optics Spectroscopy , SPIE Vol. 1172 Chemical, Biochemical and Environmental Sensors (1989) pp. 273-286. 

Wolff, Ch. M. and H. A. Mottola. 1978. Enzymic substrate determination in closed flowthrough systems by sample injection and amperometric monitoring of dissolved oxygen levels. Anal. Chem. 50 94-99. 

Michaelis constant An experimentally determined parameter inversely indicative of the affinity of an enzyme for its substrate. For a constant enzyme concentration, the Michaelis constant is that substrate concentration at which the rate of reaction is half its maximum rate. In general, the Michaelis constant is equivalent to the dissociation constant of the enzyme-substrate complex. 

Enzyme Assays. An enzyme assay determines the amount of enzyme present in sample. However, enzymes are usually not measured on a stoichiometric basis. Enzyme activity is usually determined from a rate assay and expressed in activity units. As mentioned above, a change in temperature, pH, and/or substrate concentration affects the reaction velocity. These parameters must therefore be carefully controlled in order to achieve reproducible results. 

Figure 4.8 The active site in all a/p barrels is in a pocket formed by the loop regions that connect the carboxy ends of the p strands with the adjacent a helices, as shown schematically in (a), where only two such loops are shown, (b) A view from the top of the barrel of the active site of the enzyme RuBisCo (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase), which is involved in CO2 fixation in plants. A substrate analog (red) binds across the barrel with the two phosphate groups, PI and P2, on opposite sides of the pocket. A number of charged side chains (blue) from different loops as welt as a Mg ion (yellow) form the substrate-binding site and provide catalytic groups. The structure of this 500 kD enzyme was determined to 2.4 A resolution in the laboratory of Carl Branden, in Uppsala, Sweden. (Adapted from an original drawing provided by Bo Furugren.)...

The three most common types of inhibitors in enzymatic reactions are competitive, non-competitive, and uncompetitive. Competitive inliibition occurs when tlie substrate and inhibitor have similar molecules that compete for the identical site on the enzyme. Non-competitive inhibition results in enzymes containing at least two different types of sites. The inhibitor attaches to only one type of site and the substrate only to the other. Uncompetitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor deactivates the enzyme substrate complex. The effect of an inhibitor is determined by measuring the enzyme velocity at various... 

Conformationally restricted analogs of substrates can be useful in elucidating both the substrate specificities and the product specificities of enzymes. The restriction can help stabilize an intermediate in the enzymatic process so that it may be isolated. Two or more otherwise structurally equivalent portions of a substrate may be rendered nonequivalent by the restriction so that potential differentiation of these portions by the enzyme in determining product specificity may be investigated. 

Mode of action and substrate specificity of the purified enzyme were determined by following the decrease in viscosity and the increase in absorbance at 235 nm in reaction mixtures in the presence of 0.187 % substrate (pectin or pectate) at pH 8.0. 

Maximal speed (Vmax) and supposed Michaelis constant (K ) of pectin hydrolysis reaction (catalyzed by the studied pectinesterase) were determined in Zinewedwer — Berk coordinated, They were determined in the range of substrate concentration values that was below optimum one V = 14.7 10 M min K = 5.56 10 M. The value of dissociated constant (KJ of the triple enzyme—substrate complex was determined from the experimental data at high substrate concentration. It was the following Kj= 0.22 M. Bunting and Murphy method was used for determination. 

In kinetic studies of enzymatic reactions, rate data are usually tested to determine if the reaction follows the Michaelis-Menten model of enzyme-substrate interaction. Weetall and Havewala [Biotechnol. and Bioeng. Symposium 3 (241), 1972] have studied the production of dextrose from cornstarch using conventional... 

In AChE-based biosensors acetylthiocholine is commonly used as a substrate. The thiocholine produced during the catalytic reaction can be monitored using spectromet-ric, amperometric [44] (Fig. 2.2) or potentiometric methods. The enzyme activity is indirectly proportional to the pesticide concentration. La Rosa et al. [45] used 4-ami-nophenyl acetate as the enzyme substrate for a cholinesterase sensor for pesticide determination. This system allowed the determination of esterase activities via oxidation of the enzymatic product 4-aminophenol rather than the typical thiocholine. Sulfonylureas are reversible inhibitors of acetolactate synthase (ALS). By taking advantage of this inhibition mechanism ALS has been entrapped in photo cured polymer of polyvinyl alcohol bearing styrylpyridinium groups (PVA-SbQ) to prepare an amperometric biosensor for... 

Competitive immunoassays may also be used to determine small chemical substances [10, 11]. An electrochemical immunosensor based on a competitive immunoassay for the small molecule estradiol has recently been reported [11]. A schematic diagram of this immunoassay is depicted in Fig. 5.3. In this system, anti-mouse IgG was physisorbed onto the surface of an SPCE. This was used to bind monoclonal mouse anti-estradiol antibody. The antibody coated SPCE was then exposed to a standard solution of estradiol (E2), followed by a solution of AP-labeled estradiol (AP-E2). The E2 and AP-E2 competed for a limited number of antigen binding sites of the immobilized anti-estradiol antibody. Quantitative analysis was based on differential pulse voltammetry of 1-naphthol, which is produced from the enzymatic hydrolysis of the enzyme substrate 1-naphthyl phosphate by AP-E2. The analytical range of this sensor was between 25 and 500pg ml. 1 of E2. 

The possibility of isolating the components of the two above-reported coupled reactions offered a new analytical way to determine NADH, FMN, aldehydes, or oxygen. Methods based on NAD(P)H determination have been available for some time and NAD(H)-, NADP(H)-, NAD(P)-dependent enzymes and their substrates were measured by using bioluminescent assays. The high redox potential of the couple NAD+/NADH tended to limit the applications of dehydrogenases in coupled assay, as equilibrium does not favor NADH formation. Moreover, the various reagents are not all perfectly stable in all conditions. Examples of the enzymes and substrates determined by using the bacterial luciferase and the NAD(P)H FMN oxidoreductase, also coupled to other enzymes, are listed in Table 5. 

On the other hand, several oxidases are known to generate hydrogen peroxide, acting as an oxidant in the CL system, from corresponding substrates. IMERs in which the oxidases are immobilized on adequate supporting materials such as glass beads have been developed. IMERs are often used for flow injection with CL detection of uric acid and glucose, and are also applicable to the CL determination of acetylcholine, choline, polyamines, enzyme substrates, etc., after online HPLC separation. 

Structures of actual enzyme-substrate complexes are generally difficult to determine, because the reaction occurs too quickly, but techniques now available occasionally enable study of these complexes [53]. Protein X-ray crystallography has several limitations, for example, it often gives little or no information about the positions of protons (because of the low electron density of hydrogen atoms) in a particular protein. This can cause prob-... 

The kinetics of the general enzyme-catalyzed reaction (equation 10.1-1) may be simple or complex, depending upon the enzyme and substrate concentrations, the presence/absence of inhibitors and/or cofactors, and upon temperature, shear, ionic strength, and pH. The simplest form of the rate law for enzyme reactions was proposed by Henri (1902), and a mechanism was proposed by Michaelis and Menten (1913), which was later extended by Briggs and Haldane (1925). The mechanism is usually referred to as the Michaelis-Menten mechanism or model. It is a two-step mechanism, the first step being a rapid, reversible formation of an enzyme-substrate complex, ES, followed by a slow, rate-determining decomposition step to form the product and reproduce the enzyme ... 

Potentiometric enzyme-based electrodes have found application in clinical, pharmaceutical, food and biochemical analyses to enable the selective determination of a wide range of important enzyme substrates, including amino acids, esters, amides, acylcholines, /Mactam antibiotics, sugars, enantioselective drugs and many others [74]. 

Substrate determinations (Table 8.10) using enzyme electrodes must be performed under controlled conditions of temperature and pH and if standard solutions are used to calibrate the electrode they must be analysed at the same time. The response time of some enzyme electrodes may be several minutes and although for many the time is shorter this factor must be considered in the design of an assay method. 

Specificity constant Defined as kcJKm. It is a pseudo-second-order rate constant which, in theory, would be the actual rate constant if formation of the enzyme-substrate complex were the rate-determining step. 

The relative activities of the enzymes which use glc-6-P as substrate determine the net flow. 

The haloalkane dehalogenase DhlA mechanism takes place in two consecutive Sn2 steps. In the first, the carboxylate moiety of the aspartate Aspl24, acting as a nucleophile on the carbon atom of DCE, displaces chloride anion which leads to formation of the enzyme-substrate intermediate (Equation 11.86). That intermediate is hydrolyzed by water in the subsequent step. The experimentally determined chlorine kinetic isotope effect for 1-chlorobutane, the slow substrate, is k(35Cl)/k(37Cl) = 1.0066 0.0004 and should correspond to the intrinsic isotope effect for the dehalogenation step. While the reported experimental value for DCE hydrolysis is smaller, it becomes practically the same when corrected for the intramolecular chlorine kinetic isotope effect (a consequence of the two identical chlorine labels in DCE). 

The major advantage associated with continuous assays is that the initial rate of product formation can be determined with complete confidence, and any unusual behavior of the enzyme would be immediately apparent. The major disadvantage is a question of throughput an instrument such as a platereader would remain dedicated to the reading of a single plate for the duration of the enzyme-substrate incubation period, compared with an equivalent discontinuous assay where an entire plate may be measured in a... 

---