Entropy of surface

For Example 30 Zidan et al. (102) postulated that NO oxidizes a surface site and produces atomic N propylene then reduces the site, and in a subsequent fast reaction the resulting adsorbed hydrocarbon fragment reacts with the adsorbed atomic N to produce acrylonitrile. According to the orders given, either Step 1 or 6 for NO, that is, NO oxidation of the surface, should be the rate-determining step. Since several questions are involved—which surface species there are, what the entropy of surface atomic N would be,... 

What conclusions can be obtained from these curves [Fig. 6.84(a-c)] Both the configurational and the libratory entropy of surface water show a strong dependence on the charge or the electrode, showing a maximum at a potential negative to the pzc, just as the experimental results indicate [see Fig. 6.84(d)]. On the other hand, the vibrational entropy of surface water shows a small linear variation with the charge of the electrode. Furthermore, what these three contributions are added according to Eq. (6.166), the result is a curve very similar to that observed experimentally [see Fig.6.84(d)]. 

Melting point Entropy of Surface Tension Molar volume... 

Based on surface tension measurements using the rise height of water in narrow capillaries and then obtaining the entropy term by numerical differentiation of the data, Drost-Hansen (1965) found a large peak in entropy of surface formation near 30 C. This is taken to mean that vicinal water is disorganized at 30°C (see also Drost-Hansen, 1973). Another example is provided by the data of Wershun (1967), who studied the effects of temperature on chromosome aberration rate in the broad-leaf bean Viciafaba. As shown in Figure 7, a notable peak occurs at 30°C. 

The enthalpies and entropies of surface reactions listed in Table 8.1 were compnted from state properties derived using the methods described in this section. 

If the dependence on temperature as well as on composition is known for a solution, enthalpies and entropies of adsorption may be calculated from the appropriate thermodynamic relationships [82]. Neam and Spaull [147] have, for example, calculated the enthalpies of surface adsorption for a series of straight-chain alcohols. They find an increment in enthalpy of about 1.96 kJ/mol per CH2 group. 

The broken bond approach has been extended by Nason and co-workers (see Ref. 85) to calculate as a function of surface composition for alloys. The surface free energy follows on adding an entropy of mixing term, and the free energy is then minimized. 

Dislocation theory as a portion of the subject of solid-state physics is somewhat beyond the scope of this book, but it is desirable to examine the subject briefly in terms of its implications in surface chemistry. Perhaps the most elementary type of defect is that of an extra or interstitial atom—Frenkel defect [110]—or a missing atom or vacancy—Schottky defect [111]. Such point defects play an important role in the treatment of diffusion and electrical conductivities in solids and the solubility of a salt in the host lattice of another or different valence type [112]. Point defects have a thermodynamic basis for their existence in terms of the energy and entropy of their formation, the situation is similar to the formation of isolated holes and erratic atoms on a surface. Dislocations, on the other hand, may be viewed as an organized concentration of point defects they are lattice defects and play an important role in the mechanism of the plastic deformation of solids. Lattice defects or dislocations are not thermodynamic in the sense of the point defects their formation is intimately connected with the mechanism of nucleation and crystal growth (see Section IX-4), and they constitute an important source of surface imperfection. 

Calculate the rotational contribution to the entropy of adsorption of ammonia on silica at -30°C, assuming (n) that the adsorbed ammonia retains one degree of rotational freedom and (b) that it retains none. In case (n) assume that the nitrogen is bonded to the surface. 

The following several sections deal with various theories or models for adsorption. It turns out that not only is the adsorption isotherm the most convenient form in which to obtain and plot experimental data, but it is also the form in which theoretical treatments are most easily developed. One of the first demands of a theory for adsorption then, is that it give an experimentally correct adsorption isotherm. Later, it is shown that this test is insufficient and that a more sensitive test of the various models requires a consideration of how the energy and entropy of adsorption vary with the amount adsorbed. Nowadays, a further expectation is that the model not violate the molecular picture revealed by surface diffraction, microscopy, and spectroscopy data, see Chapter VIII and Section XVIII-2 Steele [8] discusses this picture with particular reference to physical adsorption. 

Thus the entropy of localized adsorption can range widely, depending on whether the site is viewed as equivalent to a strong adsorption bond of negligible entropy or as a potential box plus a weak bond (see Ref. 12). In addition, estimates of AS ds should include possible surface vibrational contributions in the case of mobile adsorption, and all calculations are faced with possible contributions from a loss in rotational entropy on adsorption as well as from change in the adsorbent structure following adsorption (see Section XVI-4B). These uncertainties make it virtually impossible to affirm what the state of an adsorbed film is from entropy measurements alone for this, additional independent information about surface mobility and vibrational surface states is needed. (However, see Ref. 15 for a somewhat more optimistic conclusion.)... 

Thus from an adsorption isotherm and its temperature variation, one can calculate either the differential or the integral entropy of adsorption as a function of surface coverage. The former probably has the greater direct physical meaning, but the latter is the quantity usually first obtained in a statistical thermodynamic adsorption model. 

Finally, it is perfectly possible to choose a standard state for the surface phase. De Boer [14] makes a plea for taking that value of such that the average distance apart of the molecules is the same as in the gas phase at STP. This is a hypothetical standard state in that for an ideal two-dimensional gas with this molecular separation would be 0.338 dyn/cm at 0°C. The standard molecular area is then 4.08 x 10 T. The main advantage of this choice is that it simplifies the relationship between translational entropies of the two- and the three-dimensional standard states. 

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. 

The standard entropy of adsorption AS2 of benzene on a certain surface was found to be -25.2 EU at 323.1 K the standard states being the vapor at 1 atm and the film at an area of 22.5 x T per molecule. Discuss, with appropriate calculations, what the state of the adsorbed film might be, particularly as to whether it is mobile or localized. Take the molecular area of benzene to be 22 A. ... 

In general, it seems more reasonable to suppose that in chemisorption specific sites are involved and that therefore definite potential barriers to lateral motion should be present. The adsorption should therefore obey the statistical thermodynamics of a localized state. On the other hand, the kinetics of adsorption and of catalytic processes will depend greatly on the frequency and nature of such surface jumps as do occur. A film can be fairly mobile in this kinetic sense and yet not be expected to show any significant deviation from the configurational entropy of a localized state. 

Neither the thermodynamic nor the rheological description of surface mobility has been very useful in the case of chemisorbed films. From the experimental point of view, the first is complicated by the many factors that can affect adsorption entropies and the latter by the lack of any methodology. 

To characterize the state of the adsorbed phase, it is useful to evaluate its molar entropy, s , defined as the mean molar value for all the molecules adsorbed over the complete range of surface coverage up to the given amount adsorbed. The molar integral entropy of adsorption. As, is then defined as... 

When the film thickens beyond two or three molecular layers, the effect of surface structure is largely smoothed out. It should therefore be possible, as Hill and Halsey have argued, to analyse the isotherm in the multilayer region by reference to surface forces (Chapter 1), the partial molar entropy of the adsorbed film being taken as equal to that of the liquid adsorptive. By application of the 6-12 relation of Chapter 1 (with omission of the r" term as being negligible except at short distances) Hill was able to arrive at the isotherm equation... 

In Fig. 5.21, from Dawson s paper, the uptake at X for the 250°C-outgassed sample is dose to the calculated value for a monolayer of water with a (H20) = 101 A. Point X has therefore been ascribed to a close-packed monolayer of water on a hydroxylated surface of rutile. The fact that the differential entropy of adsorption relative to the liquid state (calculated from the isosteric heat of adsorption) changes sharply from negative to positive values in this region with A s 0 at X was regarded as supporting evidence. ... 

Values for many properties can be determined using reference substances, including density, surface tension, viscosity, partition coefficient, solubihty, diffusion coefficient, vapor pressure, latent heat, critical properties, entropies of vaporization, heats of solution, coUigative properties, and activity coefficients. Table 1 Hsts the equations needed for determining these properties. 

---