Enlightenment Golinski

Donovan, Philosophical Chemistry in the Scottish Enlightenment-, Golinski, Science as Public Culture. 

Golinski, Jan. Science as public culture chemistry and the enlightenment in Britain, 1760-1820. Cambridge Cambridge Univ P, 1992. 

Robert E. Schofield, The Enlightenment ofJoseph Priestley A Study of his Life and Work (University Park, Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997). There is also much of interest on Priestley in Jan Golinski, Science as Public Culture. Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1/60—1820 (Cambridge and New York Cambridge University Press, 1992), esp. chapters 3 and 4. 

Golinski, Jan (1992). Science as Public Culture Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain 1760-1820. Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge University Press. 

Jan Golinski, Utility and Audience in Eighteenth-Century Chemistry Case Studies of William Cullen and Joseph Priestley, British Journal for the History of Science 21, 1988, 1-31 Roy Porter, Science, Provincial Culture and Public Opinion in Enlightenment England, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 3, 1980, 20--46. 

William Cullen and Joseph Black successively built on Boerhaave s accomplishments to effect a more thoroughgoing face-lift for chemistry in Scotland Arthur Donovan, Philosophical Chemistry in the Scottish Enlightenment (Edinburgh University Press, 1975) Jan Golinski, Science as Public Culture (Cambridge University Press, 1992). 

Clark, William, Jan Golinski, and Simon Schaffer, eds. The Sciences in Enlightened Europe (University of Chicago Press, 1999). 

A number of scholars characterized these sites ofknowledge production in terms of the texts, instruments, practitioners and audiences involved in their construction and circulation. While a few scholars focused exclusively on the literary structure and devices of the core texts of the Chemical Revolution, constructivists related the form, function and content of these texts to procedures and practices for the construction of facts, the replication of experiments and the formation of chemistry as a public science. While Schaffer, Roberts and Bensaude-Vincent explored the role of material instruments, such as the eudiometer, ice-calorimeter and balance, as mediating objects used by chemists to persuade audiences and create communities, Golinski prioritized human over material agency in an account of the discursive practices Enlightenment chemists used to... 

Schaffer, Machine Philosophy , p. 182 S. Schaffer, Enlightened Automota , in W. Clark, J. Golinski and S. Schaffer (eds), The Sciences in Enlightened Europe (Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press, 1999), pp. 126-65, p. 182. 

Golinski, J., Sciencethe Enlightenment (Review of T. Hankins, Science and the Enlighten-menif. History of Science, 24 (1986), pp. 411-24. 

J. Golinski (1992) andj. McEvoy Language, hberty and chemistry in the English Enlightenment in B. Bensaude-Vincent, and F. Abbri (eds) (1995), pp. 123-142. 

---