Enforcement accommodative

This document describes the GHS. It contains harmonized classification criteria and hazard communication elements. In addition, guidance is included in the document to assist countries and organizations in the development of tools for implementation of the GHS. The GHS is designed to permit self-classification. The provisions for implementation of the GHS allow the uniform development of national policies, while remaining flexible enough to accommodate any special requirements that might have to be met. Furthermore, the GHS is intended to create user-friendly approach, to facilitate the work of enforcement bodies and to reduce the administrative burden. 

With respect to technological risks, communication and participation are key to improved risk and crisis management as well as public acceptance of facilities and operations (Chakraborty 2011). Jacob Kringen (Chapter 11 in this volume) points out that the style of communication and inclusion defines much of what is known as regulatory style in the literature. This may vary between educational, accommodative, conciliatory, persuasive, insistent, and legalistic enforcement practices. Yet each of these styles demands a specific approach to internal and external communication and stakeholder involvement. 

While the federal antidiscrimination laws don t require an employer to accommodate an employee who must care for a disabled family member, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) may require an employer to take such steps. The Department of Labor enforces the FMLA. For more information, call 1-866-487-9243. 

To enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Conunission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes. 

Often the soft films deposited on hard substrates have the possibility to pile-up upon indentation due to the change of the films plastic deformation behaviour attributed to the constraint stress enforced by the relatively harder substrate, whereas in the opposite case the films tend to sink-in. As a result, the former case could erroneously increase the mechanical properties calculated using Oliver-Pharr method because according to the method E oc where A is extracted from nanoindentation load-depth data and not from direct measurement, while the piled-up material would accommodate an extra amount of load but causes underestimation of the real contact depth and hence the contact area. On the other hand, the sink-in effect accounts for the overestimation of the real contact area and hence decrease of the calculated mechanical properties. Both of these cases would cause problems in the calculation using Oliver-Pharr method, which was first established for monolithic materials use only, as the calculated mechanical properties deviate from the true values. Therefore, in the absence of the pile-up and sink-in effects, the calculation in this study using Oliver-Pharr method could generate more accurate estimation towards the real mechanical properties of the film. 

---