Energy uncertainty relation

We can interpret the universal result (4) as an expression of the time-energy uncertainty relation for an unstable level with lifetime At, relating the energy broadening (uncertainty) of e) to At, the interval between measurements (Fig. 1),... 

In fact, the photon creation and annihilation events at each molecule appear simultaneous, as far as real experimental measurements with finite time resolution are concerned. However, the time-energy uncertainty relation does permit short-lived states that are not properly energy-conserving. This helps explain why it is necessary to include diagrams corresponding to time sequences in which a virtual photon is created before either real photon arrives. It nonetheless transpires that such apparently unphysical cases produce the smallest contributions to the matrix element. 

See Ballentine, Section 12.3.) The derivation of (5.15) shows that At is to be interpreted as the lifetime of the state whose energy is uncertain by AE. It is often stated that At in (5.15) is the duration of the energy measurement. However, Aharonov and Bohm have shown that energy can be measured reproducibly in an arbitrarily short time [Y. Aharonov andD. Bohm, Phys. Rev., 122, 1649 (1961) 134, B1417 (1964) see also S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A, 71,042106 (2005) P. Busch, The Time-Energy Uncertainty Relation, arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105049]. 

The time-energy uncertainty relation is even more mysterious than that of position and momentum, but it has been verified by many experiments. Time is not a mechanical variable that can be expressed in terms of coordinates and momenta and does not correspond to any quantum mechanical operator, so we cannot calculate a standard deviation of a time. The standard interpretation of the time-energy uncertainty relation is that if At is the time during which the system is known to be in a given state (the lifetime of the state) then there is a minimum uncertainty A in the energy of the system that is given by... 

A light pulse of a center frequency Q impinges on an interface. Raman-active modes of nuclear motion are coherently excited via impulsive stimulated Raman scattering, when the time width of the pulse is shorter than the period of the vibration. The ultrashort light pulse has a finite frequency width related to the Fourier transformation of the time width, according to the energy-time uncertainty relation. 

The energy q of a nuclear or electronic excited state of mean lifetime t cannot be determined exactly because of the limited time interval At available for the measurement. Instead, q can only be established with an inherent uncertainty, AE, which is given by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation in the form of the conjugate variables energy and time,... 

Another Heisenberg uncertainty relation exists for the energy E ofa particle and the time t at which the particle has that value for the energy. The uncertainty Am in the angular frequency of the wave packet is related to the uncertainty A in the energy of the particle by Am = h.E/h, so that the relation (1.25) when applied to a free particle becomes... 

We see that the energy and time obey an uncertainty relation when At is defined as the period of time required for the expectation value of S to change by one standard deviation. This definition depends on the choice of the dynamical variable S so that At is relatively larger or smaller depending on that choice. If d(S)/dt is small so that S changes slowly with time, then the period At will be long and the uncertainty in the energy will be small. 

Track theory starts with localized energy loss. On the other hand, attention has been frequently drawn to the role of delocalized energy loss in radiation chemistry. Fano (1960) estimated from the uncertainty relation that an energy... 

Quantum mechanics enters here with a statement of uncertainty relating energy and time. If you know the lifetime of the excited state in a transition then you cannot know exactly the energy of the transition. This uncertainty principle is wrapped up in the following relation ... 

The first view is based on the uncertainty relation between time and energy. When the electron is in the region of the barrier, its velocity, as determined by the kinetic energy, is ... 

There is no doubt that a giant step forward has been made in crystal structure prediction by coupling sound theoretical means with massive computer power, but the inherent uncertainties related to randomness and to handling of temperature remain - see above improvement in force fields and in computational procedures, as results demonstrate, are very welcome but are neither indispensable nor sufficient. And there is no hope that this barrier may fall in the future, as it stems from first principles. The next step forward is the inclusion of kinetic energies and temperature in the model. This is already possible, although with great limitations, as described in Sect. 6. 

In these Lorentzian lines, the parameter x describes the kinetic decay lifetime of the molecule. One says that the spectral lines have been lifetime or Heisenberg broadened by an amount proportional to l lx. The latter terminology arises because the finite lifetime of the molecular states can be viewed as producing, via the Heisenberg uncertainty relation AEAt > -h, states whose energy is "uncertain" to within an amount AE. 

In the previous derivation of the new uncertainty relations, we were concerned only with conjugate observables space and momentum. The same process can be used step by step to derived the relations for the conjugate observables energy and time. It is sufficient to change the variables... 

---