Empirical parameterization

In classical molecular dynamics, on the other hand, particles move according to the laws of classical mechanics over a PES that has been empirically parameterized. By means of their kinetic energy they can overcome energetic barriers and visit a much more extended portion of phase space. Tools from statistical mechanics can, moreover, be used to determine thermodynamic (e.g. relative free energies) and dynamic properties of the system from its temporal evolution. The quality of the results is, however, limited to the accuracy and reliability of the (empirically) parameterized PES. 

Another philosophical issue centers on whether a method should be a protocol specified down to the last detail (i.e. be truly black-box ), or whether it should merely outline a general approach with minor details to be decided on a case-by-case basis. Obviously a method where empirical parameterization is kept to the absolute minimum or is absent altogether will offer more degrees of freedom in this regard than the one where a minor change in the protocol would, for consistency, require reparameterization against a large experimental data set. Yet... 

Baker, B.M. Murphy, K.P. Prediction of binding energetics from structure using empirical parameterization. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 295, 294—... 

The procedure of developing a semi-empirical parameterization can be generally formalized in terms of Eq. (2) as follows. A set of experimental energies 5(C QF5) corresponding to different chemical compositions C, molecular geometries Q, and electronic states with specific values of S and T is given. In the case when a response to an external field is to be reproduced the latter can be included into the coordinate set Q. Developing a parameterization means to find certain (sub)set of parameters w which minimizes the norm of the deviation vector with the components... 

In the present paper we demonstrated the feasibility of a semiempirical description of electronic structure and properties of the Werner TMCs on a series of examples. The main feature of the proposed approach was the careful following to the structural aspects of the theory in order to preclude the loss of its elements responsible for description of qualitative physical behavior of the objects under study, in our case of TMCs. If it is done the subsequent parameterization becomes sensible and successful solutions of two long lasting problems semi-empirical parameterization of transition metals complexes and of extending the MM description to these objects can be suggested. 

The molecular mechanics method is extremely parameter dependent. A force field equation that has been empirically parameterized for calculating peptides must be used for peptides it cannot be applied to nucleic acids without being re-parameterized for that particular class of molecules. Thankfully, most small organic molecules, with molecular weights less than 800, share similar properties. Therefore, a force field that has been parameterized for one class of drug molecules can usually be transferred to another class of drug molecules. In medicinal chemistry and quantum pharmacology, a number of force fields currently enjoy widespread use. The MM2/MM3/MMX force fields are currently widely used for small molecules, while AMBER and CHARMM are used for macromolecules such as peptides and nucleic acids. 

It should be apparent that when taken to its QM limit the EVB process simply becomes multi-state CI (see Chapter 14) for a QM system coupled to a classical environment. However, the enormous cost that would be associated with carrying out such a CI calculation at a level sufficiently accurate to compete with an empirically parameterized set of potential functions has inhibited any developments along these lines. Of course, there are interesting systems where data for empirical parameterization are lacking, but the cost of the multi-state CI treatment is still sufficiently expensive that it has not yet attracted any attention. 

Parameterizing the Bond Stretching Term A forcefield can be parameterized by reference to experiment (empirical parameterization) or by getting the numbers from high-level ab initio or density functional calculations, or by a combination of both approaches. For the bond stretching term of Eq. 3.2 we need stretch ancl 4q-Experimentally, stretch could be obtained from IR spectra, as the stretching frequency of a bond depends on the force constant (and the masses of the atoms involved) [8], and Zeq could be derived from X-ray diffraction, electron diffraction, or microwave spectroscopy [9],... 

This very empirically parameterized equation for nonelectrostatic terms is a characteristic of the SMx series (solvent model 1,2,..., now up to SM8) of Cramer and Truhlar [22]. 

Energetics from Structure Using Empirical Parameterization. 

Such methods do not handle the two-electron interactions explicitly but rather allow for them using properties of the one-electron density. This leads to lower cost and therefore a wider range of applicability. Recent forms of DFT have also introduced a considerable amount of empirical parameterization, sometimes using the same set of experimental data. At the present time, the principal limitation of DFT models is that there is no clear route for convergence of methods to the correct answer. .. ... 

The groups he mentions are essentially the ab initio-ists and a posteriori-ist discussed by Coulson back in 1959. The ab initio-ists demand a clear route for convergence . The aposteriori-ists are willing to accept a considerable amount of empirical parameterization in order to facilitate a particular application. 

In contrast, quantum mechanical calculations are more time consuming but are not dependent on empirical parameterization (i.e., they are ab initio). These methods have long been used to deduce and rationalize the structures and relative energies not... 

UDM (Urban Dispersion Model) (Hall et al., 2002 [248]) is a widely-used model developed by the UK Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) based on assumptions of a Gaussian shape and empirical parameterizations developed from special field and laboratory experiments involving obstacle arrays. 

In this paragraph the wall function concept is outlined. The wall functions are empirical parameterizations of the mean flow variable profiles within the inner part of the wall boundary layers, bridging the fully developed turbulent log-law flow quantities with the wall through the viscous and buffer sublayers where the two-equation turbulence model is strictly not valid. These empirical parameterizations thus allow the numerical flow simulation to be carried out with a finite resolution within the wall boundary layers, and one avoids accounting for viscous effects in the model equations. Therefore, in the numerical implementation of the k-e model one anticipates that the boundary layer flow is not fully resolved by the model resolution. The first grid point or node used at a wall boundary is thus placed within the fully turbulent log-law sub-layer, rather than on the wall itself [95]. In effect, the wall functions amount to a synthetic boundary condition for the k-e model. In addition, the limited boundary layer resolution required also provides savings on computer time and storage. 

Measurements performed under the experimental conditions of —5.5 < log(Mo) < —2.8 and 1.6 < o < 6 were used as basis making an empirical parameterization for the net transverse lift force coefficient. 

The definitions of the heat and mass transfer fluxes are thus merely based on empirical arguments, so in the literature there are given more than one way to interpret the transfer coefficients [15, 139]. Basically, the transfer coefficients are either treated as an alternative model to the fundamental diffusion models (i.e., the Fourier s and Pick s laws) or the transfer coefficients are taking both diffusive and convective mechanisms into account through empirical parameterizations. However, in reaction engineering practice the distingtion between these approaches is rather blurred so it is not always clear which of the fundamental transport processes that are actually implemented. 

It is noted that Sideman and Pinczewski [135], among others, have examined this hypothesis in further details and concluded that there are numerous requirements that need to be fulfilled to achieve similarity between the momentum, heat and mass transfer fluxes. On the other hand, there are apparently fewer restrictions necessary to obtain similarity between heat and low-flux mass transfer. This observation has lead to the suggestion that empirical parameterizations developed for mass transfer could be applied to heat transfer studies simply by replacing the Schmidt number Sct = ) by the Prandtl number Prt = and visa versa. 

---