Empirical Correction Method

Harkins and Jordan [43] found, however, that Eq. 11-26 was generally in serious error and worked out an empirical correction factor in much the same way as was done for the drop weight method. Here, however, there is one additional variable so that the correction factor/ now depends on two dimensionless ratios. Thus... 

The second, third, and fourth corrections to [MPd/b-Jl lG(d,p)] are analogous to A (- -). The zero point energy has been discussed in detail (scale factor 0.8929 see Scott and Radom, 1996), leaving only HLC, called the higher level correction, a purely empirical correction added to make up for the practical necessity of basis set and Cl truncation. In effect, thermodynamic variables are calculated by methods described immediately below and HLC is adjusted to give the best fit to a selected group of experimental results presumed to be reliable. 

In addition to qualitative identification of the elements present, XRF can be used to determine quantitative elemental compositions and layer thicknesses of thin films. In quantitative analysis the observed intensities must be corrected for various factors, including the spectral intensity distribution of the incident X rays, fluorescent yields, matrix enhancements and absorptions, etc. Two general methods used for making these corrections are the empirical parameters method and the fimdamen-tal parameters methods. 

The main difference between the G2 models is tlie way in which tlie electron correlation beyond MP2 is estimated. The G2 method itself performs a series of MP4 and QCISD(T) calculations, G2(MP2) only does a single QCISD(T) calculation with tlie 6-311G(d,p) basis, while G2(MP2, SVP) (SVP stands for Split Valence Polarization) reduces the basis set to only 6-31 G(d). An even more pruned version, G2(MP2,SV), uses the unpolarized 6-31 G basis for the QCISD(T) part, which increases the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) to 2.1 kcal/mol. That it is possible to achieve such good performance with tliis small a basis set for QCISD(T) partly reflects the importance of the large basis MP2 calculation and partly the absorption of errors in the empirical correction. 

For open-shell species the UHF method is used, which in some cases suffers from spin contamination. To correct for this an empirical correction based on the... 

The introduction of various empirical corrections, such as scale factors for frequencies and energy corrections based on the number of electrons and degree of spin contamination, blurs the distinction between whether they should be considered ab initio, or as belonging to the semi-empirical class of methods, such as AMI and PM3. Nevertheless, the accuracy tiiat tiiese methods are capable of delivering makes it possible to calculate absolute stabilities (heat of formation) for small and medium sized systems which rival (or surpass) experimental data, often at a substantial lower cost than for actually performing the experiments. 

Curve 1 shows the electronic energy of the hydrogen molecule neglecting interelectronic interaction (from Burrau s solution for the molecule-ion) curve 2, the electronic energy empirically corrected by Condon s method and curve 3, the total energy of the hydrogen molecule, calculated by Condon s method. 

A common problem for both methods lies in the use of potentials that do not possess the correct net attractiveness. This can have the consequence that continuum feamres appear shifted in energy. In particular, there is evidence that the LB94 exchange-correlation potential currently used for the B-spline calculations, although possessing the correct asymptotic behavior for ion plus electron, is too attractive, and near threshold features can then disappear below the ionization threshold. An empirical correction can be made, offsetting the energy scale, but this can mean that dynamics within a few electronvolts of threshold get an inadequate description or are lost. There is limited scope to tune the Xa potential, principally by adjustment of the assumed a parameter, but for the B-spline method a preferable alternative for the future may well be use of the SAOP functional that also has correct asymptotic behavior, but appears to be better calibrated for such problems [79]. 

The results of the various semi-empirical calculations on the reference structures contained within the JSCH-2005 database (134 complexes 31 hydrogen-bonded base-pairs, 32 interstrand base pairs, 54 stacked base pairs and 17 amino acid base pairs) are summarised in Table 5-10. The deviations of the various interaction energies from the reference values are displayed in Figure 5-5. As with the S22 training set, the AMI and PM3 methods generally underestimate the interactions whereas the dispersion corrected method (PM3-D) mostly over-estimates the interactions a little. Overall the PM3-D results are particularly impressive given that the method has only... 

Methods such as G3 and CBS-QB3 do reach the goal of chemical accuracy (generally defined as 1 kcal/mol) on average, but worst-case errors for problematic molecules may exceed this criterion by almost an order of magnitude. In addition, almost all of these approaches involve some level of parameterization and/or empirical correction against experimental data. While this is by and large possible (albeit not without pitfalls) in the kcal/mol accuracy range for first-and second-row compounds, experimental data of sub-kcal/mol accuracy are thin on the... 

The usual design philosophy for this type of methods is bottom-up one starts with an approximate model, compares results with experiments, analyzes the deviations, and uses them to determine empirical corrections and/or additional terms to be added to the model, after which the cycle is repeated if desired. 

The main feature of the CBS (complete basis set) methods (e.g. CBS-Q [15] and CBS-QB3 [20]) is extrapolation to the complete basis set limit at the UMP2 level. Additional calculations [UMP4 and UQ-CISD(T) or UCCSD(T)] are performed to estimate higher-order effects. A scaled ZPVE, together with a size-consistent empirical correction and a spin-contamination correction, are added to yield the total CBS energy of the molecule. 

In summary, computational quantum mechanics has reached such a state that its use in chemical kinetics is possible. However, since these methods still are at various stages of development, their routine and direct use without carefully evaluating the reasonableness of predictions must be avoided. Since ab initio methods presently are far too expensive from the computational point of view, and still require the application of empirical corrections, semiempirical quantum chemical methods represent the most accessible option in chemical reaction engineering today. One productive approach is to use semiempirical methods to build systematically the necessary thermochemical and kinetic-parameter data bases for mechanism development. Following this, the mechanism would be subjected to sensitivity and reaction path analyses for the determination of the rank-order of importance of reactions. Important reactions and species can then be studied with greatest scrutiny using rigorous ab initio calculations, as well as by experiments. 

Approximate derivation o Tobwg)- Given values of and the basic BWG treatment also leads to explicit equations for the ordering temperature, T ", but the omission of sro inevitably leads to calculated values that are appreciably higher than shown by experiment. If the simplicity of the BWG method is to be retained, an empirical correction factor (x) has to be included, where X = Typical equations for various structural transitions are given... 

The G2 and G3 methods go beyond extrapolation to include small and entirely general empirical corrections associated with the total numbers of paired and unpaired electrons. When sufficient experimental data are available to permit more constrained parameterizations, such empirical corrections can be associated with more specific properties, e.g., with individual bonds. Such bond-specific corrections are employed by the BAG method described in Section 7.7.3. Note that this approach is different from those above insofar as the fundamentally modified quantity is not Feiec, but rather A/7. That is, the goal of the method is to predict improved heats of formation, not to compute more accurate electronic energies, per se. Irikura (2002) has expanded upon this idea by proposing correction schemes that depend not only on types of bonds, but also on their lengths and their electron densities at their midpoints. Such detailed correction schemes can offer very high accuracy, but require extensive sets of high quality experimental data for their formulation. 

---