Emission standards physical

The physical state of a pollutant is obviously important a particulate coUector cannot remove vapor. Pollutant concentration and carrier gas quantity ate necessary to estimate coUector si2e and requited efficiency and knowledge of a poUutant s chemistry may suggest alternative approaches to treatment. Emission standards may set coUection efficiency, but specific regulations do not exist for many trace emissions. In such cases emission targets must be set by dose—exposure time relationships obtained from effects on vegetation, animals, and humans. With such information, a Ust of possible treatment methods can be made (see Table 1). 

Sources Subject to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Sources subject to PSD regulations (40 CFR, Sec. 52.21, Aug. 7, 1980) are major stationary sources and major modifications located in attainment areas and unclassified areas. A major stationaiy source was defined as any source hsted in Table 25-4 with the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of any pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act (CAA) or any other source with the potential to emit 250 tons per year or more of any CAA pollutant. The potential to emit is defined as the maximum capacity to emit the pollutant under apphcable emission standards and permit conditions (after apphcation of any air pollution control equipment) excluding secondaiy emissions. A major modification is defined as any physical or operational change of a major stationaiy source producing a significant net emissions increase of any CAA pollutant (see Table 25-5). 

Low Emissions Moulded Foam Machine Standard Physical Properties... 

Instrument calibration standards - physical sources such as line and tungsten lamp emissions, known instrument independent luminescence standards, and so forth... 

Definition and Uses of Standards. In the context of this paper, the term "standard" denotes a well-characterized material for which a physical parameter or concentration of chemical constituent has been determined with a known precision and accuracy. These standards can be used to check or determine (a) instrumental parameters such as wavelength accuracy, detection-system spectral responsivity, and stability (b) the instrument response to specific fluorescent species and (c) the accuracy of measurements made by specific Instruments or measurement procedures (assess whether the analytical measurement process is in statistical control and whether it exhibits bias). Once the luminescence instrumentation has been calibrated, it can be used to measure the luminescence characteristics of chemical systems, including corrected excitation and emission spectra, quantum yields, decay times, emission anisotropies, energy transfer, and, with appropriate standards, the concentrations of chemical constituents in complex S2unples. 

Requirements of Standards. The general requirements for luminescence standards have been discussed extensively (3,7-9) and include stability, purity, no overlap between excitation and emission spectra, no oxygen quenching, and a high, constant qtiantum yield independent of excitation wavelength. Specific system parameters--such as the broad or narrow excitation and emission spectra, isotropic or anisotropic emission, solubility in a specific solvent, stability (standard relative to sample), and concentration--almost require the standard to be in the same chemical and physical environment as the sample. 

Calibration. In general, standards used for instrument calibration are physical devices (standard lamps, flow meters, etc.) or pure chemical compounds in solution (solid or liquid), although some combined forms could be used (e.g., Tb + Eu in glass for wavelength calibration). Calibrated lnstr iment parameters include wavelength accuracy, detection-system spectral responsivity (to determine corrected excitation and emission spectra), and stability, among others. Fluorescence data such as corrected excitation and emission spectra, quantum yields, decay times, and polarization that are to be compared among laboratories are dependent on these calibrations. The Instrument and fluorescence parameters and various standards, reviewed recently (1,2,11), are discussed briefly below. 

Physical Models. Two basic approaches are used to quantify secondary ion intensities physical models and empirical methods. The physical models consist of several theoretical or semi-empirical treatments developed to simulate secondary ion emission [3,48-50]. Although several models have been developed (see Werner L3j for a recent review) and continue to be applied, the use of calibration standards (empirical methods) consistently give better results, e.g., accuracies of a factor of 2-3 for physical models compared to 10-20% for empirical methods. 

In this paper, we discuss several categories of decay data which have contributed to low-energy nuclear physics, indicate some of the ways they are useful in solving problems in other areas and identify needs for further measurements. Illustrations include half-life and emission-probability data of actinide nuclides important for reactor technology and useful as reference standards for nuclear-data measurements. Decay data of highly neutron-rich fission-product nuclides are important in such diverse areas as astrophysics and reactor-safety research. Some of these data needs and experimental approaches suitable for satisfying them are presented. 

---