Emission factors vapor pressure

Unfortunately, it is not possible to accurately predict rates of volatilization or project air concenpations based on vapor pressures. Even when ambient conditions, substtates and formulations are similar, emission rates for pesticides will depend on other factors such as the concenttation and molecular structure of the active ingredient. Jackson and Lewis (1981) compared emission rates from three kinds of pest conttol sttips in the same room under constant conditions of temperature (21 1 °C) and humidity (50 20 %) and found that room air concentta-tions over a period of 30d were much higher for diazinon than for chlorpyrifos, but similar to those for propoxur [2-(l-methylethoxy)phenylmethylcarbamate]. On Day 2 , room air levels were 0.76 pg/m for diazinon, 0.14 pg/m for chlorpyrifos and 0.79 pg/m for propoxur. After 30 d, the air concenttations were 1.21, 0.16 and 0.70 pg/m, respectively. The vapor pressure of diazinon is nearly 100 times higher than that of chlorpyrifos and nearly 1000 times lower than that of propoxur (4 x 10 kPa at 20 °C). 

This vapor acts as a driving force for formaldehyde diffusion from the wood cel I towards the product surface, and for emission from the finished wood product. An internal vapor pressure of 20 Torr would approximately correspond to a formaj ehyde air concentration of about 1 ppm at 25 t, a load factor of I m and a ventilation rate of 1 ach. However, as emission continues and depletes the methylene glycol concentration in the wood moisture, the dissociation of hemiacetals will set in and add to the formaldehyde source. The bottleneck in the formaldehyde transport will be diffusion through the product towards the product surface. This process depends on the permeability of the product which, in turn, depends on diffusion... 

Evaporative emissions are a function of fuel volatility. Recently, a model for estimating the impact of various factors on evaporative emissions was published (Kishan,S., 1988). In this model, Reid vapor Pressure is one of the determinants of emissions via an exponential term, ga (RAP-9.o) Using this model, the use of oxygenates which increase Reid Vapor Pressure, such as alcohols, would be expected to increase evaporative emissions, whereas the ethers which do not significantly affect RVP would not. 

From an engineering perspective, in assessing the required characteristics of the biofuels themselves, one must consider a variety of chemical, physical, and environmental properties. These include factors such as total energy content, ease of ignition (quantified by octane and cetane numbers), heat release rates, evaporative spray characteristics (vapor pressures), flammability safety (flash point), flow properties (viscosity), density, miscibility, fuel toxicity, emissions, impact on engine parts, and stability in storage. 

Water Vapor The contribution to the emissivity of a gas containing H9O depends on Tc andp L and on total pressure P and partial pressure p . Table 5-8 gives constants for use in evaluating . Allowance for departure from the special pressure conditions is made by multiplying by a correction factor C read from Fig. 5-21 as a function of (p + P) and p ,L. The absorptivity 0t of water vapor for blackbody radiation is evaluated from Table 5-8 but at T instead of Tc and at p LT /Tc instead of p, h. Multiply by (Tc/Ti)° . ... 

Emissivity at a total pressure P oilier than P = 1 atm is determined by multiplying the emissivity value at 1 atm by a pressure correction factor C obtained from Figure l3-37n for water vapor. That is,... 

Figure 10.7 Correction factor for converting emissivity of H20 vapor at 1 atm total pressure to emissivity at P atm total pressure. From McAdams [25].

FIGURE 7.22 (a) Total emissivity eH,o for water vapor as a function of Tgas and Ph2oL, product (b) the corresponding correction factor CH o for different total pressures. 

The intensity of the emission lines produced by a MIP is affected by the following factors a) power absorbed from the plasma b) gas and electron temperature c) nature, pressure, and flow rate of the plasma gas d) sample vaporization e) sample size and composition /) observed zone of the plasma. 

Calculation of the required condenser surface is not trivial. In contrast to the common applications where saturated vapors are condensed the permeate is a superheated vapor mixture. For design calculations the selection of appropriate heat-transfer coefficients has to consider the cooling to saturation conditions, the presence of noncondensable gases, and the partial condensation of the components along the respective dew lines. Total condensation of the more volatile components of the permeate vapor will often not be possible, but any losses of permeate vapor through the vacuum pump have to cope with the respective emission control regulations. An important factor is the solubility of the components of the permeate in the liquid phase. An additional condenser at the high-pressure side of the vacuum pump is a feasible option. 

Figure 9-9. Pressure correction factor for water vapor actual emissivity is value from Figure 9-8 times C (11).

---