Elimination transformations naming

Nakagawa, H. Sugahara, T. Ogasawara, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4523-4526. Fuchter, M. J. Chugaev elimination. In Name Reactions for Functional Group Transformations-, Li, J. J., Corey, E. J., Eds. John Wiley Sons Hoboken, NJ, 2007, pp 334-342. (Review). 

In solvent-elimination LC-FTIR, basically three types of substrates and corresponding IR modes can be discerned, namely, powder substrates for diffuse reflectance (DRIFT) detection, metallic mirrors for reflection-absorption (R-A) spectrometry, and IR-transparent windows for transmission measurements [500]. The most favourable solvent-elimination LC-FTIR results have been obtained with IR-transparent deposition substrates that allow straightforward transmission measurements. Analyte morphology and/or transformation should always be taken into consideration during the interpretation of spectra obtained by solvent-elimination LC-FTIR. Dependent on the type of substrate and/or size of the deposited spots, often special optics such as a (diffuse) reflectance unit, a beam condenser or an FITR microscope are used to scan the deposited substances (typical diameter of the FITR beam, 20 pm). 

It can be assumed that the substrate 2-549 undergoes two elimination steps after lithiation to give 2-552 via 2-550 and 2-551. The last step is an intramolecular substitution affording 2-553, which was further transformed into the desired bioactive compound CMi-977 (also named LDP-977) (2-554). 

The criterion of mean-unbiasedness seems to be occasionally overemphasized. For example, the bias of an MLE may be mentioned in such a way as to suggest that it is an important drawback, without mention of other statistical performance criteria. Particularly for small samples, precision may be a more important consideration than bias, for purposes of an estimate that is likely to be close to the true value. It can happen that an attempt to correct bias results in lowered precision. An insistence that all estimators be UB would conflict with another valuable criterion, namely parameter invariance (Casella and Berger 1990). Consider the estimation of variance. As remarked in Sokal and Rohlf (1995), the familiar sample variance (usually denoted i ) is UB for the population variance (a ). However, the sample standard deviation (s = l is not UB for the corresponding parameter o. That unbiasedness cannot be eliminated for all transformations of a parameter simply results from the fact that the mean of a nonlinearly transformed variable does not generally equal the result of applying the transformation to the mean of the original variable. It seems that it would rarely be reasonable to argue that bias is important in one scale, and unimportant in any other scale. 

As for the quasi (pseudo)-steady-state case, the basic assumption in deriving kinetic equations is the well-known Bodenshtein hypothesis according to which the rates of formation and consumption of intermediates are equal. In fact. Chapman was first who proposed this hypothesis (see in more detail in the book by Yablonskii et al., 1991). The approach based on this idea, the Quasi-Steady-State Approximation (QSSA), is a common method for eliminating intermediates from the kinetic models of complex catalytic reactions and corresponding transformation of these models. As well known, in the literature on chemical problems, another name of this approach, the Pseudo-Steady-State Approximation (PSSA) is used. However, the term "Quasi-Steady-State Approximation" is more popular. According to the Internet, the number of references on the QSSA is more than 70,000 in comparison with about 22,000, number of references on PSSA. 

The preferred elimination of a molecule of carboxylic acid instead of water in this case may be explained by the intermediate formation of a bicyclic oxetane 289. Along with conversions described here, which have some analogy with what is known from a-1 dimerizations and reactions of monomeric C-adducts, a new transformation has been found in the case of 4-1 dimerization, namely disproportionation, as shown in the following paragraphs. 

The cyclohexene 121, which was readily accessible from the Diels-Alder reaction of methyl hexa-3,5-dienoate and 3,4-methylenedioxy-(3-nitrostyrene (108), served as the starting point for another formal total synthesis of ( )-lycorine (1) (Scheme 11) (113). In the event dissolving metal reduction of 121 with zinc followed by reduction of the intermediate cyclic hydroxamic acid with lithium diethoxyaluminum hydride provided the secondary amine 122. Transformation of 122 to the tetracyclic lactam 123 was achieved by sequential treatment with ethyl chloroformate and Bischler-Napieralski cyclization of the resulting carbamate with phosphorus oxychloride. Since attempts to effect cleanly the direct allylic oxidation of 123 to provide an intermediate suitable for subsequent elaboration to ( )-lycorine (1) were unsuccessful, a stepwise protocol was devised. Namely, addition of phenylselenyl bromide to 123 in acetic acid followed by hydrolysis of the intermediate acetates gave a mixture of two hydroxy se-lenides. Oxidative elimination of phenylselenous acid from the minor product afforded the allylic alcohol 124, whereas the major hydroxy selenide was resistant to oxidation and elimination. When 124 was treated with a small amount of acetic anhydride and sulfuric acid in acetic acid, the main product was the rearranged acetate 67, which had been previously converted to ( )-lycorine (108). 

Despite the chemical diversity of the several hundred structures representing herbicidal activity, most reactions of herbicides fall within only a limited number of mechanistic types oxidation, reduction, nucleophilic displacements (such as hydrolysis), eliminations, and additions. "Herbicides", after all, are more-or-less ordinary chemicals, and their principal transformations in the environment are fundamentally no different from those in laboratory glassware. Figure 2 illustrates three typical examples which have received their share of classical laboratory study—the alkaline hydrolysis of a carboxylic ester (in this case, an ester of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, IX), the cycloaddition of an alcohol to an olefin (as in the acetylene, VI), and the 3-elimination of a dithiocarbamate which provides the usual synthetic route to an isothiocyanate (conversion of an N.N-dimethylcarbamic acid salt, XI, to methyl isothiocyanate). Allow the starting materials herbicidal action (which they have), give them names such as "2,4-D ester" or "pronamide" or "Vapam", and let soil form the walls of an outdoor reaction kettle the reactions and products remain the same. 

The introduction of tellurium into an organic substrate promotes functional groups transformations or presents structural features that can be used for synthetic purposes, if suitable methods to remove tellurium from the resulting structures are available. To date, four main strategies have been explored for this end, namely, the telluroxide elimination, the tellurium/metal exchange, the coupling of tellurides with organometallic species and with alkynes, and the reductive removal via free radicals. 

In the classic model of initiation and promotion, conventional tumor promoters (CTP) inhibit the intracellular mechanisms that can eliminate the nascent clone, facilitate accumulation of the mutations necessary for full malignant transformation, or disrupt intercellular signaling [15], A classic example of a CTP is 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol- l 3-acetate (TPA, also referred to as phorbol myristate acetate, PMA). The mechanisms proposed for CTP that are relevant for the tumor types associated with immunosuppression, such as nonmelanoma skin tumors and lymphomas, are listed in Table 27.3. The table is limited to mechanisms of promotion and does not include tumor initiation mechanisms, namely those that directly or indirectly damage DNA (e.g., free radicals mediated by metabolism of ethanol) [16] or are mechanisms of neovasularization (e.g., angiogenesis in response to UV-A and B) [17], The table also excludes mechanisms of CTP that have only been studied in the context of irrelevant tumors, such as TCDD in hepatocarcinogenesis [18],... 

If, following absorption, medications were undisturbed by the body, we would need to take only one dose for an eternal effect. Of course, this is not the case. As soon as drugs enter the bloodstream, the process of metabolism ensues. The body recognizes the drug as a foreign substance and eliminates it outright (say, via the kidneys, as in the case of lithium) or transforms it chemically, using a complex enzyme mechanism located in the liver. This chemical transformation enables the medication to be eliminated from the body. In some cases, the chemical transformation produces a new compound that may also have therapeutic effects (or, in some rare instances, a toxic effect). For example, fluoxetine (trade name Prozac) is transformed into norfluoxetine, which is also an antidepressant. A similar situation occurs with the old tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline—trade name Elavil—to nortriptyline the latter, in fact, is... 

---