Lavoisier elements

In his list of elements Lavoisier mentioned thirty-three substances ... 

This situation persisted up to the nineteenth century. Even Lavoisier, who put so much effort in constructing an unambiguous chemical language, used pictures to represent elements. Lavoisier and his colleagues used letters enclosed in a circle, short... 

For a long time, silica was considered to be an element - Lavoisier... 

Likewise, Lavoisier s work was also able to refute the theory that the world was composed of either one, two, three, or four elements. Lavoisier defined an element as the last point which analysis is capable of reaching, or in modem terms, a substance that cannot be broken down any further into its components. This break from the theories of the ancient world allowed chemists to pursue the study of chemistry with a different outlook of the world. By defining elements as the last points of analysis, Lavoisier opened up new investigative possibilities. In his classic textbook Elements of Chemistry (generally acknowledged to be the first modem chemistry textbook), he compiled a fist of all the substances he could not break down into simpler substances, that is, he created the first table of elements (although not the Periodic Table of later years). By acknowledging that there could be more elements than his preliminary fist provided, Lavoisier left the search for more elements to his successors. 

Having thus determined what substances were to he regarded as elements, Lavoisier and some of the French chemists who had adopted his view set on themselves the further task of devising a suitable system of chemical nomenclature that emphasized giving every known substance a name that corresponded to its chemical composition. The old names before Lavoisier s chemical nomenclature were often coined to indicate some physical property of a substance or its mode of preparation, or to perpetuate its discoverer s name or the place where it had been found as a mineral. 

In order to steer clear of metaphysical speculations about the ultimate nature of matter, Lavoisier avoids any reference to atoms or to minutest particles of matter and proposes, instead, a reformed nomenclature for chemistry, in which the names of compound substances would reflect their elementary composition . In fact, he regards the decomposition of material bodies into the substances of which they are composed as the chief aim of chemistry. Ultimately, however, this proposed reform of the nomenclature of compound substances in terms of their elementary composition forces the question of what is to be regarded as an element . Lavoisier proposes to answer this question by restricting himself to what can be ascertained by strict empirical means. He explains that, [i]f by the name of element, we mean the simple and indivisible molecules that compose bodies, it is probable that we do not know them if, on the contrary, we attach to the name of element or principle of bodies the idea of the last point at which analysis arrives, all of the substances that we have not yet been able to decompose by any means are, for us, to be considered elements. ... 

A. Lavoisier overturned the phlogistic theory. Even the name dephlogisticated muric acid evoked a strong protest in him. In his opinion, the acid obtained by Scheele was a compound of muric. (hydrochloric) acid and oxygen. Oxidized muric acid—that is how Lavoisier named what we know as elemental chlorine now. The French chemist believed that all acids must contain oxygen combined with some element. Lavoisier called this element murium in the case of muric acid and included it into his Table of Simple Bodies (murium radical—radical muriatique). 

Ibid. p. 123. Apart frx>m these three elements, Lavoisier also considered azote and phosphorus to be elemental components of plant substances. On Lavoisier s redefinition of organic substances, see also the previous ch ter. The quantitative aspects of Lavoisier s redefinition of organic substances are discussed later. 

French chemist Antoine Lavoisier made the first list of elements. The list included the elements known at the time. Among them were light and heat. We now know these are not elements. Lavoisier also defined what an... 

Another important feature of the Traite was that it contained the first explicit statement of the law of conservation of mass. In the chapter on fermentation Lavoisier wrote We may lay it down as an incontestable axiom, that, in all operations of art and nature, nothing is created an equal quantity of matter exists both before and after the experiment the quality and quantity of the elements remain precisely the same and nothing takes place beyond changes and modifications in the combination of these elements. Lavoisier described a... 

In 1814, J.J. Berzelius succeeded for the first time in systematically naming chemical substances by building on the results of quantitative analyses and on the definition of the term "element by Lavoisier. In the 19th century, the number of known chemical compounds increased so rapidly that it became essential to classify them, to avoid a complete chaos of trivial names (see Section 2.2.4). 

Named by Lavoisier, hydrogen is the most abundant of all elements in the universe. The heavier elements were originally made from Hydrogen or from other elements that were originally made from Hydrogen. 

Lavoisier beUeved he could distinguish acetic acid from acetous acid, the hypothetical acid of vinegar, which he thought was converted into acetic acid by oxidation. Following Lavoisier s demise, Adet proved the essential identity of acetic acid and acetous acid, the latter being the monohydrate, and in 1847, Kolbe finally prepared acetic acid from the elements. 

Berzehus (19) further appHed and amplified the nomenclature introduced by Guyton de Morveau and Lavoisier. It was he who divided the elements into metalloids (nonmetals) and metals according to their electrochemical character, and the compounds of oxygen with positive elements (metals) into suboxides, oxides, and peroxides. His division of the acids according to degree of oxidation has been Httie altered. He introduced the terms anhydride and amphoteric and designated the chlorides in a manner similar to that used for the oxides. 

A. L. Lavoisier, Ea Traitu Elumentaire de Chemie, 1789, R. Kerr, trans.. Elements of Chemist, 1790 facsimile reprint, Dover PubHcations, Inc., New York, 1965. 

Silicon [7440-21-3] Si, from the Latin silex, silicis for flint, is the fourteenth element of the Periodic Table, has atomic wt 28.083, and a room temperature density of 2.3 gm /cm. SiUcon is britde, has a gray, metallic luster, and melts at 1412°C. In 1787 Lavoisier suggested that siUca (qv), of which flint is one form, was the oxide of an unknown element. Gay-Lussac and Thenard apparently produced elemental siUcon in 1811 by reducing siUcon tetrafluoride with potassium but did not recognize it as an element. In 1817 BerzeHus reported evidence of siUcon occurring as a precipitate in cast iron. Elemental siUcon does not occur in nature. As a constituent of various minerals, eg, siUca and siUcates such as the feldspars and kaolins, however, siUcon comprises about 28% of the earth s cmst. There are three stable isotopes that occur naturally and several that can be prepared artificially and are radioactive (Table 1) (1). 

E. Coeuret and A. Storck, Elements de Genie Electrochimique, Lavoisier, Paris, 1984. 

Hydrogen recognized as the essential element in acids by H. Davy (contrary to Lavoisier who originally considered oxygen to be essential — hence Greek o vg ystuopot, acid former). 

A. L. Lavoisier recognized oxygen as an element, developed the modem theory of combustion, and demolished the phlogiston theory. 

Elemental character of S pr jposed by A.-L. Lavoisier though even in 1809 experiments (presumably on impure samples) led Himiphry Davy to contend that oxygen ajid hydrogen were also essential constituents of S. 

Zinc and cadmium tarnish quickly in moist air and combine with oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus and the halogens on being heated. Mercury also reacts with these elements, except phosphorus and its reaction with oxygen was of considerable practical importance in the early work of J. Priestley and A. L. Lavoisier on oxygen (p. 601). The reaction only becomes appreciable at temperatures of about 350° C, but above about 400°C HgO decomposes back into the elements. 

Laws of Thermochemistry. Lavoisier and Laplace (1780) found that the heat required to decompose a chemical compound into its elements was numerically equal to the heat generated in its formation under the same conditions of T and P. That is, AHj = -AHp where the subscript d refers to decomposition reaction [52, p. 24 61, p. 303]. 

---