Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrostatic precipitator particulate removal

These are prepared by drawing the distillation and combustion products from damp hardwood sawdust into a condenser fitted with an electrostatic precipitator. This removes all particulate matter from the condensate, which is collected and settled to allow separation into aqueous and tarry phases. The clear aqueous phase is the desired product. [Pg.286]

The gaseous ammonia is passed through electrostatic precipitators for particulate removal and mixed with the cooled gas stream. The combined stream flows to the ammonia absorber where the ammonia is recovered by reaction with a dilute solution of sulfuric acid to form ammonium sulfate. Ammonium sulfate precipitates as small crystals after the solution becomes saturated and is withdrawn as a slurry. The slurry is further processed in centrifuge faciHties for recovery. Crystal size can be increased by employing one of two processes (99), either low differential controUed crystallization or mechanical size enlargement by continuous compacting and granulation. [Pg.359]

Cement plants in the United States are now carehiUy monitored for compliance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for emissions of particulates, SO, NO, and hydrocarbons. AH plants incorporate particulate collection devices such as baghouses and electrostatic precipitators (see Air POLLUTION CONTROL methods). The particulates removed from stack emissions are called cement kiln dust (CKD). It has been shown that CKD is characterized by low concentrations of metals which leach from the CKD at levels far below regulatory limits (63,64). Environmental issues continue to be of concern as the use of waste fuel in cement kilns becomes more widespread. [Pg.295]

Dry aerosols, or particulate matter, differ so much from the carrying gas stream that their removal should present no major difficulties. The aerosol is different physically, chemically, and electrically. It has vastly different inertial properties than the carrying gas stream and can be subjected to an electric charge. It may be soluble in a specific liquid. With such a variety of removal mechanisms that can be applied, it is not surprising that particulate matter, such as mineral dust, can be removed by a filter, wet scrubber, or electrostatic precipitator with equally satisfactory results. [Pg.462]

Electrostatic precipitators are satisfactory devices for removing small particles from moving gas streams at high collection efficiencies. They have been used almost universally in power plants for removing fly ash from the gases prior to discharge. Electrostatic precipitators have the capability of fine particulate control. Resistivity plays an important role in determining whether a particle can be readily collected in this device. [Pg.149]

Electrostatic precipitators (ESP) and wet gas scrubbers (WGS) are widely used to remove particulates from the FCC flue gas. Both can recover over 80% of filtrable solids. An ESP (Figure 10-6) is typically installed downstream of the flue gas heat recovery (prior to atmospheric discharge) to minimize particulate concentration. If both low particulate and low SO requirements are to be met, a wet gas scrubber such as Belco s (Figure 10-7) should be considered. If SO removal... [Pg.328]

Where low-grade coal is burned, electrostatic precipitators or fabric filters may be required for flue-gas particulate collection and a wet desulfurization system (gas scrubbers) to remove sulfur from the flue gas. [Pg.54]

Ash particles produced in coal combustion are controlled by passing the flue gases through electrostatic precipitators. Since most of the mass of particulate matter is removed by these devices, ash received relatively little attention as an air pollutant until it was shown that the concentrations of many toxic species in the ash particles increase as particle size decreases. Particle removal techniques become less efiective as particle size decreases to the 0.1-0.5 pm range, so that particles in this size range that escape contain disproportionately high concentrations of toxic substances. [Pg.129]

Another critical part of the incinerator design is the pollution control system.11 Pollution control systems directly influence the levels and kinds of pollutants that are released and that can potentially reach the public. Most modern hazardous waste incinerators are designed with extensive air pollution removal systems. For example, a common pollution control system might include a system that cools or quenches gases produced by burning waste, followed by a system that reduces acid gas emissions, and ultimately followed by a particulate removal system such as fabric filters (bag-houses), electrostatic precipitators, venturi scrubbers, and others.10... [Pg.957]


See other pages where Electrostatic precipitator particulate removal is mentioned: [Pg.105]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.2196]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.1952]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.2446]    [Pg.2427]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.2200]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.1366]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.1440]    [Pg.2252]    [Pg.2398]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.95]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.9 , Pg.463 , Pg.466 , Pg.467 , Pg.490 , Pg.491 , Pg.492 ]




SEARCH



Electrostatic precipitation

Electrostatic precipitator

Particulate removal

© 2024 chempedia.info