Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrophoretic mobility surface complexes

Electrophoretic mobility measurement has been useful in this context, as the measurement is made at very low surface area-to-solution volume ratios, However, particle electrophoretic mobility is related to surface charge in complex ways depending upon particle size and morphology 2], Quantitative analysis... [Pg.136]

Figure 9.19. The diffuse double layer, (a) Diffuseness results from thermal motion in solution, (b) Schematic representation of ion binding on an oxide surface on the basis of the surface complexation model, s is the specific surface area (m kg ). Braces refer to concentrations in mol kg . (c) The electric surface potential, falls off (simplified model) with distance from the surface. The decrease with distance is exponential when l/ < 25 mV. At a distance k the potential has dropped by a factor of 1/c. This distance can be used as a measure of the extension (thickness) of l e double layer (see equation 40c). At the plane of shear (moving particle) a zeta potential can be established with the help of electrophoretic mobility measurements, (d) Variation of charge distribution (concentration of positive and negative ions) with distance from the surface (Z is the charge of the ion), (e) The net excess charge. Figure 9.19. The diffuse double layer, (a) Diffuseness results from thermal motion in solution, (b) Schematic representation of ion binding on an oxide surface on the basis of the surface complexation model, s is the specific surface area (m kg ). Braces refer to concentrations in mol kg . (c) The electric surface potential, falls off (simplified model) with distance from the surface. The decrease with distance is exponential when l/ < 25 mV. At a distance k the potential has dropped by a factor of 1/c. This distance can be used as a measure of the extension (thickness) of l e double layer (see equation 40c). At the plane of shear (moving particle) a zeta potential can be established with the help of electrophoretic mobility measurements, (d) Variation of charge distribution (concentration of positive and negative ions) with distance from the surface (Z is the charge of the ion), (e) The net excess charge.
Another very important issue in this respect is the way to account for the surface conductivity. The formula of Bikerman (Equation 5.359), the correction factor to the electrophoretic mobility of Henry 3 (Equation 5.368), and the formula of O Brien and Hunter (Equation 5.371), quoted above are derived under the assumption that only the ions in the movable part (x > x Figure 5.67) of the EDL contribute to the surface conductivity, Xs- Moreover, the ions in the EDL are taken to have the same mobility as that in the bulk electrolyte solution. A variety of experimental data ° suggest, however, that the ions behind the shear plane (x < x ) and even those adsorbed in the Stem layer may contribute to Xs- Th term anomalous surface conductance was coined for this phenomenon. Such an effect can be taken into account theoretically, but new parameters (such as the ion mobility in the Stem layer) must be included in the consideration. Hence, the interpretation of data by these more complex models usually requires the application of two or more electrokinetic techniques which provide complementary information. Dukhin and van de Ven specify three major (and relatively simple) types of models as being most suitable for data interpretation. These models differ in the way they consider the surface conductivity and the connection between i and "Q. [Pg.296]

The anomalous surface conduction was studied extensively by O Brien and by Hunter, and they could show that the Stem layer conduction is about thirty times larger than the diffuse layer conduction at low salt concentration. This explains substantial discrepancies between the electrophoresis and the conductance estimates of zeta potential. For thin double-layer systems such as this, the zeta potential is usually calculated from the electrophoretic mobility using Smoluchowski s formula, which in O Brien s case corresponds to a zeta potential of 50 mV [8]. Complex conductivity measurements result in f = —160 mV. [Pg.574]

Water-soluble cellulose derivatives themselves adsorb onto solid particles and may for instance affect the suspension properties of these insolubles. The mechanisms involved are quite complex and depend on the polymer concentration. At low concentrations macromolecules influence the electrophoretic mobility and the flocculation of the particles. At higher concentrations, surface coverage by the adsorbed polymer is sufficient to prevent particle-particle interaction and thus to stabilize the suspension sterically. As an example, the effect of NaCMC (among other polymers) on the zeta potential, flocculation and sedimentation properties of sulfadimidine has been investigated by Kellaway and Najib [115,116],... [Pg.244]

The lipoproteins are macromolecules with varying complexes of lipids where the hydrophobic lipid portions—cholesterol esters and triglycerides—are localized at the core of the molecules. The amphipathic surface layers surrounding the core contain the apolipoproteins and phospholipids. The lipoproteins vary in size, density, lipid composition, and apolipoprotein constituents, and they ean be classihed by size, the flotation rate determined by ultracentrifugation, or their electrophoretic mobilities. Put simply, the density of a lipoprotein particle is determined by the relative amounts of lipid and protein contained in the particle. Chylomicrons and very low density lipoproteins have the highest lipid content and the lowest protein content thus, very excessive amounts of chylomicrons float on the surface of plasma. In descending order of size, the broad lipoprotein fractions (with their electrophoretic mobility) are... [Pg.184]

Weesner FJ, Bleam WF (1997) X-ray absorption and EPR spectroscopic characterization of adsorbed copper(II) complexes at the boehmite (AlOOH) surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 196 79-86 Weesner FJ, Bleam WF (1998) Binding characteristics of Pb2+ on anion-modified and pristine hydrous oxide surfaces studied by electrophoretic mobility and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 205 380-389... [Pg.105]

P. Bar-On, I. Shainberg, and I. Michaeli, Electrophoretic mobility of montmorillonite particles saturated with Na/Ca ions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 33 471 (1970). R. D. Harter and G. Stotzky, X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, electrophoretic mobility, and pH of some stable smectite-protein complexes. Sod Sci. Soc. Am. J. 37 116 (1973). S. L. Swartzen-Allen and E. Matijevi6, Colloid and surface properties of clay suspensions. II Electrophoresis and cation adsorption of montmorillonite, /. Colloid Interface Sci. 50 143 (1975). [Pg.111]

Suarez et al. (36) use a combination of FTIR spectroscopy, electrophoretic mobility and pH titration data to deduce the specific nature of anionic surface species sorbed to aluminum and silicon oxide minerals. Phosphate, carbonate, borate, selenate, selenite and molybdate data are reviewed and new data on arsenate and arsenite sorption are presented. In all cases the surface species formed are inner-sphere complexes, both monodentate and bidentate. Two step kinetics is typical with monodentate species forming during the initial, rapid sorption step. Subsequent slow sorption is presumed due to the formation of a bidentate surface complex, or in some cases to diffusion controlled sorption to internal sites on poorly crystalline solids. [Pg.7]

Identification of the specific species of the adsorbed oxyanion as well as mode of bonding to the oxide surface is often possible using a combination of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, electrophoretic mobility (EM) and sorption-proton balance data. This information is required for selection of realistic surface species when using surface complexation models and prediction of oxyanion transport. Earlier, limited IR research on surface speciation was conducted under dry conditions, thus results may not correspond to those for natural systems where surface species may be hydrated. In this study we review adsorbed phosphate, carbonate, borate, selenate, selenite, and molybdate species on aluminum and iron oxides using FTIR spectroscopy in both Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) and Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform (DRIFT) modes. We present new FTIR, EM, and titration information on adsorbed arsenate and arsenite. Using these techniques we... [Pg.136]


See other pages where Electrophoretic mobility surface complexes is mentioned: [Pg.85]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.1466]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.325]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.99 ]




SEARCH



Electrophoretic mobility

Mobility surface

Surface complex

Surface complexation

© 2024 chempedia.info