Electronic structure density functional theory

Among various theories of electronic structure, density functional theory (DFT) [1,2] has been the most successful one. This is because of its richness of concepts and at the same time simplicity of its implementation. The new concept that the theory introduces is that the ground-state density of an electronic system contains all the information about the Hamiltonian and therefore all the properties of the system. Further, the theory introduces a variational principle in terms of the ground-state density that leads to an equation to determine this density. Consider the expectation value (H) of the Hamiltonian (atomic units are used)... 

Parr B 2000 webpage http //net.chem.unc.edu/facultv/rap/cfrap01. html Professor Parr was among the first to push the density functional theory of Hohenberg and Kohn to bring it into the mainstream of electronic structure theory. For a good overview, see the book ... 

Massobrio C, Pasquarello A and Corso A D 1998 Structural and electronic properties of small Cu clusters using generalized-gradient approximations within density functional theory J. Chem. Phys. 109 6626... 

W Kohn. Density functional theory of electronic structure. J Phys Chem 100 12974-12980, 1996. 

The optimised interlayer distance of a concentric bilayered CNT by density-functional theory treatment was calculated to be 3.39 A [23] compared with the experimental value of 3.4 A [24]. Modification of the electronic structure (especially metallic state) due to the inner tube has been examined for two kinds of models of concentric bilayered CNT, (5, 5)-(10, 10) and (9, 0)-(18, 0), in the framework of the Huckel-type treatment [25]. The stacked layer patterns considered are illustrated in Fig. 8. It has been predicted that metallic property would not change within this stacking mode due to symmetry reason, which is almost similar to the case in the interlayer interaction of two graphene sheets [26]. Moreover, in the three-dimensional graphite, the interlayer distance of which is 3.35 A [27], there is only a slight overlapping (0.03-0.04 eV) of the HO and the LU bands at the Fermi level of a sheet of graphite plane [28,29],... 

Ab initio molecular orbital theory is concerned with predicting the properties of atomic and molecular systems. It is based upon the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics and uses a variety of mathematical transformation and approximation techniques to solve the fundamental equations. This appendix provides an introductory overview of the theory underlying ab initio electronic structure methods. The final section provides a similar overview of the theory underlying Density Functional Theory methods. 

The ab initio methods used by most investigators include Hartree-Fock (FFF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) [6, 7]. An ab initio method typically uses one of many basis sets for the solution of a particular problem. These basis sets are discussed in considerable detail in references [1] and [8]. DFT is based on the proof that the ground state electronic energy is determined completely by the electron density [9]. Thus, there is a direct relationship between electron density and the energy of a system. DFT calculations are extremely popular, as they provide reliable molecular structures and are considerably faster than FFF methods where correlation corrections (MP2) are included. Although intermolecular interactions in ion-pairs are dominated by dispersion interactions, DFT (B3LYP) theory lacks this term [10-14]. FFowever, DFT theory is quite successful in representing molecular structure, which is usually a primary concern. 

The basis set is 6-31G(d,p), and electron correlation at the MP2 level is included. A similar structure is obtained with the AMI and PM3 semi-empirical methods. Density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-31G(dp,p) level also produced the same structure for this ion-pair. The only observed differences between the semi-empiri-cal and the ab initio structures were slightly shorter hydrogen bonds (PM3 and AMI) between FI, F2, and F5 and the G2-F1 (H18) on the imidazolium ring. 

It is clear that an ah initio calculation of the ground state of AF Cr, based on actual experimental data on the magnetic structure, would be at the moment absolutely unfeasible. That is why most calculations are performed for a vector Q = 2ir/a (1,0,0). In this case Cr has a CsCl unit cell. The local magnetic moments at different atoms are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. Such an approach is used, in particular, in papers [2, 3, 4], in which the electronic structure of Cr is calculated within the framework of spin density functional theory. Our paper [6] is devoted to the study of the influence of relativistic effects on the electronic structure of chromium. The results of calculations demonstrate that the relativistic effects completely change the structure of the Or electron spectrum, which leads to its anisotropy for the directions being identical in the non-relativistic approach. 

Fischer-type carbene complexes, generally characterized by the formula (CO)5M=C(X)R (M=Cr, Mo, W X=7r-donor substitutent, R=alkyl, aryl or unsaturated alkenyl and alkynyl), have been known now for about 40 years. They have been widely used in synthetic reactions [37,51-58] and show a very good reactivity especially in cycloaddition reactions [59-64]. As described above, Fischer-type carbene complexes are characterized by a formal metal-carbon double bond to a low-valent transition metal which is usually stabilized by 7r-acceptor substituents such as CO, PPh3 or Cp. The electronic structure of the metal-carbene bond is of great interest because it determines the reactivity of the complex [65-68]. Several theoretical studies have addressed this problem by means of semiempirical [69-73], Hartree-Fock (HF) [74-79] and post-HF [80-83] calculations and lately also by density functional theory (DFT) calculations [67, 84-94]. Often these studies also compared Fischer-type and... 

Density-functional theory is best known as the basis for electronic structure calculations. A variant of this theory can be used to calculate the structure of inhomogeneous fluids [35] the free energy of the fluid is expressed as a functional of the density of the various components a theorem asserts that this functional attains its minimum for the true density profiles. 

The determination of the electronic structure of lanthanide-doped materials and the prediction of the optical properties are not trivial tasks. The standard ligand field models lack predictive power and undergoes parametric uncertainty at low symmetry, while customary computation methods, such as DFT, cannot be used in a routine manner for ligand field on lanthanide accounts. The ligand field density functional theory (LFDFT) algorithm23-30 consists of a customized conduct of nonempirical DFT calculations, extracting reliable parameters that can be used in further numeric experiments, relevant for the prediction in luminescent materials science.31 These series of parameters, which have to be determined in order to analyze the problem of two-open-shell 4f and 5d electrons in lanthanide materials, are as follows. 

Efforts to tame the unfavorable scaling of electronic structure methods are not limited to density functional theory. For a general summary of the current state of the art see the review by Goedecker, 1999. 

---