Electronic states electronically diabatic representation

This makes it desirable to define other representations in addition to the electronically adiabatic one [Eqs. (9)-(12)], in which the adiabatic electronic wave function basis set used in the Bom-Huang expansion (12) is replaced by another basis set of functions of the electronic coordinates. Such a different electronic basis set can be chosen so as to minimize the above mentioned gradient term. This term can initially be neglected in the solution of the / -electionic-state nuclear motion Schrodinger equation and reintroduced later using perturbative or other methods, if desired. This new basis set of electronic wave functions can also be made to depend parametrically, like their adiabatic counterparts, on the internal nuclear coordinates q that were defined after Eq. (8). This new electronic basis set is henceforth refened to as diabatic and, as is obvious, leads to an electronically diabatic representation that is not unique unlike the adiabatic one, which is unique by definition. 

Quantum reaction dynamics, electronic states (Continued) diabatization matrix, 295-300 electronically diabatic representation, 292-293... 

The non-adiabatic character of the process under study is included in the present approach in the evaluation of the initial wavepacket in Eq.(7). In an electronic diabatic representation, the electronic wavefunctions are considered to do not depend on the nuclear coordinates, so that the coupling between different states is only given by the electronic Hamiltonian, being of potential-type character. 

Under the conditions of validity of the two-electronically-adiabatic-state approximation it is possible to change from the i]/al,ad(r q) (n = i, j) electronically adiabatic representation to a diabatic one 1,ad(r q) (n = i, j) for which the VR Xn(R) terms in the corresponding diabatic nuclear motion equations are significantly smaller than in the adiabatic equation or, for favorable conditions, vanish [24-26]. Such an electronically diabatic representation is usually more convenient for scattering calculations involving two electronically adiabatic PESs, but not for those involving a single adiabatic PES. This matter will be further discussed in Sec. III.B.3 for the case in which a conical intersection between the E ad(q) and Ejad(q) PESs occurs. 

An illustration of wave packet propagation on two-coupled electronic states in diabatic representation. Nonadiabatic transition occurs at the intersection region of the two potential energy surfaces, resulting in the observed two portions of the wave packet (initiated on state 1) on the two electronic states, with the larger portion remaining on the initiated state. 

To obtain potential surfaces for two electronic states that will be degenerate at these points, we write a Hamiltonian as a 2 x 2 matrix in a diabatic representation in the following form ... 

In the two-adiabatic-electronic-state Bom-Huang description of the total orbital wave function, we wish to solve the corresponding nuclear motion Schrodinger equation in the diabatic representation... 

H3 (and its isotopomers) and the alkali metal triiners (denoted generally for the homonuclears by X3, where X is an atom) are typical Jahn-Teller systems where the two lowest adiabatic potential energy surfaces conically intersect. Since such manifolds of electronic states have recently been discussed [60] in some detail, we review in this section only the diabatic representation of such surfaces and their major topographical details. The relevant 2x2 diabatic potential matrix W assumes the fomi... 

In the previous section, we discussed the calculation of the PESs needed in Eq. (2.16a) as well as the nonadiabatic coupling terms of Eqs. (2.16b) and (2.16c). We have noted that in the diabatic representation the off-diagonal elements of Eq. (2.16a) are responsible for the coupling between electronic states while Dp and Gp vanish. In the adiabatic representation the opposite is true The off-diagonal elements of Eq. (2.16a) vanish while Du and Gp do not. In this representation, our calculation of the nonadiabatic coupling is approximate because we assume that Gp is negligible and we make an approximation in the calculation of Dp. (See end of Section n.A for more details.)... 

Density functional theory, direct molecular dynamics, complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) technique, non-adiabatic systems, 404-411 Density operator, direct molecular dynamics, adiabatic systems, 375-377 Derivative couplings conical intersections, 569-570 direct molecular dynamics, vibronic coupling, conical intersections, 386-389 Determinantal wave function, electron nuclear dynamics (END), molecular systems, final-state analysis, 342-349 Diabatic representation ... 

To apply the mapping formalism to vibronically coupled systems, we identify the / ) with electronic states and the h m with operators of the nuclear dynamics. Hereby, the adiabatic as well as a diabatic electronic representation may be employed. In a diabatic representation, we have [cf. Eq. (1)]... 

In principle, the time evolution of a particular linear superposition on the molecular base states will reflect a chemical process via the changes shown by the amplitudes. This represents a complete quantum mechanical representation of the chemical processes in Hilbert space. The problem is that the separability cannot be achieved in a complete and exact manner. One way to introduce a model that is able to keep as much as possible of the linear superposition principle is to use generalized electronic diabatic base functions. 

The theoretical description of photochemistry is historically based on the diabatic representation, where the diabatic models have been given the generic label desorption induced by electronic transitions (DIET) [91]. Such theories were originally developed by Menzel, Gomer and Redhead (MGR) [92,93] for repulsive excited states and later generalized to attractive excited states by Antoniewicz [94]. There are many mechanisms by which photons can induce photochemistry/desorption direct optical excitation of the adsorbate, direct optical excitation of the metal-adsorbate complex (i.e., via a charge-transfer band) or indirectly via substrate mediated excitation (e-h pairs). The differences in these mechanisms lie principally in how localized the relevant electron and hole created by the light are on the adsorbate. 

For a molecular system with only a few active electronic states, such as Nst < 10, and for example two degrees of freedom Q = (x, y) and mass M for nuclear motions, it is convenient to represent operators with matrices in the electronic basis, whose elements are yet operators but only on the nuclear degrees of freedom. The equation for nuclear motions in the diabatic representation is... 

Transitions between electronic states are formally equivalent to transitions between different vibrational or rotational states which were amply discussed in Chapters 9 11. Computationally, however, they are much more difficult to handle because they arise from the coupling between electronic and nuclear motions. The rigorous description of electronic transitions in polyatomic molecules is probably the most difficult task in the whole field of molecular dynamics (Siebrand 1976 Tully 1976 Child 1979 Rebentrost 1981 Baer 1983 Koppel, Domcke, and Cederbaum 1984 Whetten, Ezra, and Grant 1985 Desouter-Lecomte et al. 1985 Baer 1985b Lefebvre-Brion and Field 1986 Sidis 1989a,b Coalson 1989). The reasons will become apparent below. The two basic approaches, the adiabatic and the diabatic representations, will be outlined in Sections 15.1 and 15.2, respectively. Two examples, the photodissociation of CH3I and of H2S, will be discussed in Section 15.3. 

This excitation/dissociation scheme is an idealized (diabatic) representation. In reality the two electronic states are strongly coupled and must be treated simultaneously, especially when the pulse duration is longer than the mixing time of about 100 fs [130]. 

Diabatic electronic states (previously termed crude adiabatic states ) are defined as slowly varying functions of the nuclear geometry in the vicinity of the reference geometry [9-11]. The final vibronic-coupling Hamiltonian is obtained by adding the nuclear kinetic-energy operator which is assumed to be diagonal in the diabatic representation. 

---