Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential energy surface conical intersection

Muller H, Koppel H, Cederbaum LS (1994) Three-dimensional nuclear dynamics on conically intersecting potential energy surfaces of o ( Ui — f>2)- J Chem Phys 101 10263... [Pg.178]

Muller H, Koppel H (1994) Adiabatic wave-packet motion on conically intersecting potential energy surfaces the case of so2( b — 82). Chem Phys 183 107... [Pg.178]

In this chapter we survey characteristic features of time-dependent quantum wave-packet dynamics on conically intersecting potential-energy (PE) surfaces. The focus will be on the fully microscopic description of nontrivial dynamical processes such as ultrafast internal conversion and photoisomerization, as well as vibrational energy redistribution and dephasing. The quantum dynamics calculations discussed in this chapter are... [Pg.395]

The stoi7 begins with studies of the molecular Jahn-Teller effect in the late 1950s [1-3]. The Jahn-Teller theorems themselves [4,5] are 20 years older and static Jahn-Teller distortions of elecbonically degenerate species were well known and understood. Geomebic phase is, however, a dynamic phenomenon, associated with nuclear motions in the vicinity of a so-called conical intersection between potential energy surfaces. [Pg.2]

At this point, it is important to note that as the potential energy surfaces are even in the vibrational coordinate (r), the same parity, that is, even even and odd odd transitions should be allowed both for nonreactive and reactive cases but due to the conical intersection, the diabatic calculations indicate that the allowed transition for the reactive case ate odd even and even odd whereas in the case of nomeactive transitions even even and odd odd remain allowed. [Pg.51]

The full quantum mechanical study of nuclear dynamics in molecules has received considerable attention in recent years. An important example of such developments is the work carried out on the prototypical systems H3 [1-5] and its isotopic variant HD2 [5-8], Li3 [9-12], Na3 [13,14], and HO2 [15-18], In particular, for the alkali metal trimers, the possibility of a conical intersection between the two lowest doublet potential energy surfaces introduces a complication that makes their theoretical study fairly challenging. Thus, alkali metal trimers have recently emerged as ideal systems to study molecular vibronic dynamics, especially the so-called geometric phase (GP) effect [13,19,20] (often referred to as the molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect [19] or Berry s phase effect [21]) for further discussion on this topic see [22-25], and references cited therein. The same features also turn out to be present in the case of HO2, and their exact treatment assumes even further complexity [18],... [Pg.552]

At minimum of the conical intersection on the upper sheet of potential energy surface. Rotation about the axis perpendicular to the plane of the molecule. [Pg.581]

H3 (and its isotopomers) and the alkali metal triiners (denoted generally for the homonuclears by X3, where X is an atom) are typical Jahn-Teller systems where the two lowest adiabatic potential energy surfaces conically intersect. Since such manifolds of electronic states have recently been discussed [60] in some detail, we review in this section only the diabatic representation of such surfaces and their major topographical details. The relevant 2x2 diabatic potential matrix W assumes the fomi... [Pg.584]

Similar to the case without consideration of the GP effect, the nuclear probability densities of Ai and A2 symmetries have threefold symmetry, while each component of E symmetry has twofold symmetry with respect to the line defined by (3 = 0. However, the nuclear probability density for the lowest E state has a higher symmetry, being cylindrical with an empty core. This is easyly understand since there is no potential barrier for pseudorotation in the upper sheet. Thus, the nuclear wave function can move freely all the way around the conical intersection. Note that the nuclear probability density vanishes at the conical intersection in the single-surface calculations as first noted by Mead [76] and generally proved by Varandas and Xu [77]. The nuclear probability density of the lowest state of Aj (A2) locates at regions where the lower sheet of the potential energy surface has A2 (Ai) symmetry in 5s. Note also that the Ai levels are raised up, and the A2 levels lowered down, while the order of the E levels has been altered by consideration of the GP effect. Such behavior is similar to that encountered for the trough states [11]. [Pg.598]

Fig. 13.5. Schematic representation of the potential energy surfaces of the ground state (S ,) and the excited state (.5,) of a nonadiabatic photoreaction of reactant R. Depending on the way the classical trajectories enter the conical intersection region, different ground-state valleys, which lead to products P and can be reached. Reproduced from Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34 549 (1995) by permission of Wiley-VCH. Fig. 13.5. Schematic representation of the potential energy surfaces of the ground state (S ,) and the excited state (.5,) of a nonadiabatic photoreaction of reactant R. Depending on the way the classical trajectories enter the conical intersection region, different ground-state valleys, which lead to products P and can be reached. Reproduced from Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34 549 (1995) by permission of Wiley-VCH.
The search for a conical intersection is also successful. The predicted structure is at the left. The predicted energies of the two states—the ground state and the first excited state—differ by about 0.00014 Hartrees, confirming that they are degenerate at these points on the two potential energy surfaces. ... [Pg.235]

Figure 14. Classical trajectories for the H + H2(v = l,j = 0) reaction representing a 1-TS (a-d) and a 2-TS reaction path (e-h). Both trajectories lead to H2(v = 2,/ = 5,k = 0) products and the same scattering angle, 0 = 50°. (a-c) 1-TS trajectory in Cartesian coordinates. The positions of the atoms (Ha, solid circles Hb, open circles He, dotted circles) are plotted at constant time intervals of 4.1 fs on top of snapshots of the potential energy surface in a space-fixed frame centered at the reactant HbHc molecule. The location of the conical intersection is indicated by crosses (x). (d) 1-TS trajectory in hyperspherical coordinates (cf. Fig. 1) showing the different H - - H2 arrangements (open diamonds) at the same time intervals as panels (a-c) the potential energy contours are for a fixed hyperradius of p = 4.0 a.u. (e-h) As above for the 2-TS trajectory. Note that the 1-TS trajectory is deflected to the nearside (deflection angle 0 = +50°), whereas the 2-TS trajectory proceeds via an insertion mechanism and is deflected to the farside (0 = —50°). Figure 14. Classical trajectories for the H + H2(v = l,j = 0) reaction representing a 1-TS (a-d) and a 2-TS reaction path (e-h). Both trajectories lead to H2(v = 2,/ = 5,k = 0) products and the same scattering angle, 0 = 50°. (a-c) 1-TS trajectory in Cartesian coordinates. The positions of the atoms (Ha, solid circles Hb, open circles He, dotted circles) are plotted at constant time intervals of 4.1 fs on top of snapshots of the potential energy surface in a space-fixed frame centered at the reactant HbHc molecule. The location of the conical intersection is indicated by crosses (x). (d) 1-TS trajectory in hyperspherical coordinates (cf. Fig. 1) showing the different H - - H2 arrangements (open diamonds) at the same time intervals as panels (a-c) the potential energy contours are for a fixed hyperradius of p = 4.0 a.u. (e-h) As above for the 2-TS trajectory. Note that the 1-TS trajectory is deflected to the nearside (deflection angle 0 = +50°), whereas the 2-TS trajectory proceeds via an insertion mechanism and is deflected to the farside (0 = —50°).
In such a case the last choice is to take the direction of the eigenvector of the only one nonzero eigenvalue of the rank one Hessian matrix of the difference between the two adiabatic potential energies [51]. In the vicinity of conical intersection, the topology of the potential energy surface can be described by the diadiabatic Hamiltonian in the form... [Pg.102]


See other pages where Potential energy surface conical intersection is mentioned: [Pg.233]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.3177]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.3177]    [Pg.922]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.6]   


SEARCH



Conic intersections surface

Conical intersection

Conical intersection of potential energy surfaces

Conical intersections surfaces

Conicity

Energy conical intersection

Intersect

Potential energy surface conical intersection, nonadiabatic coupling

Surfaces intersections

© 2024 chempedia.info