Electronic state relativistic effects

Buendia et al. calculated many states of the iron atom with VMC using orbitals obtained from the parametrized optimal effective potential method with all electrons included. Iron is a particularly difficult system, and the VMC results are only moderately accurate. The same authors also pubhshed VMC and Green s functions quantum Monte Carlo (GFMQ calculations on the first transition-row atoms with all electrons. GFMC is a variant of DMC where intermediate steps are used to remove the time step error. Cafiarel et al. presented a very careful study on the role of electron correlation and relativistic effects in the copper atom using all-electron DMC. Relativistic effects were calculated with the Dirac-Fock model. Several states of the atom were evaluated and an accuracy of about 0.15 eV was achieved with a single determinant. ... 

Keywords Electronic correlation Relativistic effects Isotopic effects Multiply excited states Hollow atoms B-spline basis set Charge transfer Photodissociation Radiative association... 

Having stated the limitations (non-relativistic Hamilton operator and the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation), we are ready to consider the electronic Schrodinger equation. It can only be solved exactly for the Hj molecule, and similar one-electron systems. In the general case we have to rely on approximate (numerical) methods. By neglecting relativistic effects, we also have to introduce electron spin as an ad hoc quantum effect. Each electron has a spin quantum number of 1 /2. In the presence of an... 

It is clear that an ah initio calculation of the ground state of AF Cr, based on actual experimental data on the magnetic structure, would be at the moment absolutely unfeasible. That is why most calculations are performed for a vector Q = 2ir/a (1,0,0). In this case Cr has a CsCl unit cell. The local magnetic moments at different atoms are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. Such an approach is used, in particular, in papers [2, 3, 4], in which the electronic structure of Cr is calculated within the framework of spin density functional theory. Our paper [6] is devoted to the study of the influence of relativistic effects on the electronic structure of chromium. The results of calculations demonstrate that the relativistic effects completely change the structure of the Or electron spectrum, which leads to its anisotropy for the directions being identical in the non-relativistic approach. 

The CPF approach gives quantitative reement with the experimental spectroscopic constants (24-25) for the ground state of Cu2 when large one-particle basis sets are used, provided that relativistic effects are included and the 3d electrons are correlated. In addition, CPF calculations have given (26) a potential surface for Cus that confirms the Jahn-Teller stabilization energy and pseudorotational barrier deduced (27-28) from the Cus fluorescence spectra (29). The CPF method has been used (9) to study clusters of up to six aluminum atoms. 

Besides these many cluster studies, it is currently not knovm at what approximate cluster size the metallic state is reached, or when the transition occurs to solid-statelike properties. As an example. Figure 4.17 shows the dependence of the ionization potential and electron affinity on the cluster size for the Group 11 metals. We see a typical odd-even oscillation for the open/closed shell cases. Note that the work-function for Au is still 2 eV below the ionization potential of AU24. Another interesting fact is that the Au ionization potentials are about 2 eV higher than the corresponding CUn and Ag values up to the bulk, which has been shown to be a relativistic effect [334]. A similar situation is found for the Group 11 cluster electron affinities [334]. 

A list of recent solid-state calculations is given in Refs. [43-45]. We mention only a few of the most recent results discussing relativistic effects. Christensen and Kolar revealed very large relativistic effects in electronic band structure calculations for CsAu... 

However, there also exists a third possibility. By using a famous relation due to Dirac, the relativistic effects can be (in a nonunique way) divided into spin-independent and spin-dependent terms. The former are collectively called scalar relativistic effects and the latter are subsumed under the name spin-orbit coupling (SOC). The scalar relativistic effects can be straightforwardly included in the one-electron Hamiltonian operator h. Unless the investigated elements are very heavy, this recovers the major part of the distortion of the orbitals due to relativity. The SOC terms may be treated in a second step by perturbation theory. This is the preferred way of approaching molecular properties and only breaks down in the presence of very heavy elements or near degeneracy of the investigated electronic state. 

Schrodinger s equation has solutions characterized by three quantum numbers only, whereas electron spin appears naturally as a solution of Dirac s relativistic equation. As a consequence it is often stated that spin is a relativistic effect. However, the fact that half-integral angular momentum states, predicted by the ladder-operator method, are compatible with non-relativistic systems, refutes this conclusion. The non-appearance of electron... 

The other relativistic effect entirely neglected so far is the spin-orbit coupling. For systems in nondegenerate states, the only first-order contribution to TAE comes from the fine structures in the corresponding atoms. Their effects can trivially be obtained from the observed electronic spectra, and hence the computational cost of this correction is fundamentally zero. 

---