Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic model molecules

Organic molecules are the easiest to model and the easiest for which to obtain the most accurate results. This is so for a number of reasons. Since the amount of computational resources necessary to run an orbital-based calculation depends on the number of electrons, quantum mechanical calculations run fastest for compounds with few electrons. Organic molecules are also the most heavily studied and thus have the largest number of computational techniques available. [Pg.283]

Cl calculations can be used to improve the quality of the wave-function and state energies. Self-consistent field (SCF) level calculations are based on the one-electron model, wherein each electron moves in the average field created by the other n-1 electrons in the molecule. Actually, electrons interact instantaneously and therefore have a natural tendency to avoid each other beyond the requirements of the Exclusion Principle. This correlation results in a lower average interelectronic repulsion and thus a lower state energy. The difference between electronic energies calculated at the SCF level versus the exact nonrelativistic energies is the correlation energy. [Pg.38]

The three-dimensional structure of protein molecules can be experimentally determined by two different methods, x-ray crystallography and NMR. The interaction of x-rays with electrons in molecules arranged in a crystal is used to obtain an electron-density map of the molecule, which can be interpreted in terms of an atomic model. Recent technical advances, such as powerful computers including graphics work stations, electronic area detectors, and... [Pg.391]

Why do we want to model molecules and chemical reactions Chemists are interested in the distribution of electrons around the nuclei, and how these electrons rearrange in a chemical reaction this is what chemistry is all about. Thomson tried to develop an electronic theory of valence in 1897. He was quickly followed by Lewis, Langmuir and Kossel, but their models all suffered from the same defect in that they tried to treat the electrons as classical point electric charges at rest. [Pg.1]

Imagine a model hydrogen molecule with non-interacting electrons, such that their Coulomb repulsion is zero. Each electron in our model still has kinetic energy and is still attracted to both nuclei, but the electron motions are completely independent of each other because the electron-electron interaction term is zero. We would, therefore, expect that the electronic wavefunction for the pair of electrons would be a product of the wavefunctions for two independent electrons in H2+ (Figure 4.1), which I will write X(rO and F(r2). Thus X(ri) and T(r2) are molecular orbitals which describe independently the two electrons in our non-interacting electron model. [Pg.87]

One of the earliest models for treating conjugated molecules is afforded by the Hiickel rr-electron model. This dates from the work of E. Hiickel in 1931. The ideas are simple and appealing, and the model enjoyed many years of successful application to individual molecules, molecular clusters and solids. [Pg.122]

NEW Spartan Model Electronic Modeling Kit, A set of easy-to-use builders allow for the construction and 3-D manipulation of molecules of any size or complexity— from a hydrogen atom to DNA and everything in between. This kit includes the SpartanModel software on CD-ROM, an extensive molecular database, 3-D glasses, and a Tutorial and Users Guide that includes a wealth of activities to help you get the most out of your course. (0-495-01793-0)... [Pg.1340]

The relevant Hamiltonian for the gas-phase solute molecules can be treated by the same three-orbitals four-electron model used in Chapter 2. Since the energy of 3 is much higher than that of , and d>2 (see Table 2.4), we represent the system by its two lowest energy resonance structures, using now the notation fa and fa as is done in eq. (2.40). The energies of these two effective configurations are now written as... [Pg.84]

The representation of an essentially infinite framework by a finite SCF treated cluster of atoms, (with or without point-ions), inevitably leads to the problem of how to truncate the model-molecule . Previous attempts at this have included using hydrogen atoms l and ghost atoms . Other possibilities include leaving the electron from the broken bond in an open shell, or closing this shell to form an ionic cluster. A series of calculations were performed to test which was the host physically realistic, and computationally viable, solution to this problem for this system. [Pg.72]

Once more, free-electron models correctly predict many qualitative trends and demonstrate the appropriateness of the general concept of electron delocalization in molecules. Free electron models are strictly one-electron simulations. The energy levels that are used to predict the distribution of several delocalized electrons are likewise one-electron levels. Interelectronic effects are therefore completely ignored and modelling the behaviour of many-electron systems in the same crude potential field is ndt feasible. Whatever level of sophistication may be aimed for when performing more realistic calculations, the basic fact of delocalized electronic waves in molecular systems remains of central importance... [Pg.332]

We have not mentioned open shells of electrons in our general considerations but then we have not specifically mentioned closed shells either. Certainly our examples are all closed shell but this choice simply reflects our main area of interest valence theory. The derivations and considerations of constraints in the opening sections are independent of the numbers of electrons involved in the system and, in particular, are independent of the magnetic properties of the molecules concerned simply because the spin variable does not occur in our approximate Hamiltonian. Nevertheless, it is traditional to treat open and closed shells of electrons by separate techniques and it is of some interest to investigate the consequences of this dichotomy. The independent-electron model (UHF - no symmetry constraints) is the simplest one to investigate we give below an abbreviated discussion. [Pg.80]

It might be thought that electron-spin coupling provides an explanation of the characteristic two-ness of electrons in molecules. This is not so spin coupling is a kind of mnemonic device for the formulation of the electron-pair model, not an explanation of it. [Pg.83]

Chemical bonding can be described in terms of a molecular orbital model. The molecular orbital approach is based on the idea that, as electrons in atoms occupy atomic orbitals, electrons in molecules occupy molecular orbitals. Molecular orbitals have many of the same properties as atomic orbitals. They are populated by electrons, beginning with the orbital with the lowest energy and a molecular orbital is full when it contains two electrons of opposite spin. [Pg.47]

Molecular Orbital Theory Model. Oxygen and hydrogen atoms in H2O are held together by a covalent bond. According to the quantum molecular orbital theory of covalent bonding between atoms, electrons in molecules occupy molecular orbitals that are described, using quantum mechanical language, by a linear combination of... [Pg.7]


See other pages where Electronic model molecules is mentioned: [Pg.122]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.1084]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.709]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.325]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.364 ]




SEARCH



Electronic models

Molecule electronic

Molecules modeling

© 2024 chempedia.info