Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron states surface density

The most popular of the scanning probe tecimiques are STM and atomic force microscopy (AFM). STM and AFM provide images of the outemiost layer of a surface with atomic resolution. STM measures the spatial distribution of the surface electronic density by monitoring the tiumelling of electrons either from the sample to the tip or from the tip to the sample. This provides a map of the density of filled or empty electronic states, respectively. The variations in surface electron density are generally correlated with the atomic positions. [Pg.310]

Figure Bl.22.4. Differential IR absorption spectra from a metal-oxide silicon field-effect transistor (MOSFET) as a fiinction of gate voltage (or inversion layer density, n, which is the parameter reported in the figure). Clear peaks are seen in these spectra for the 0-1, 0-2 and 0-3 inter-electric-field subband transitions that develop for charge carriers when confined to a narrow (<100 A) region near the oxide-semiconductor interface. The inset shows a schematic representation of the attenuated total reflection (ATR) arrangement used in these experiments. These data provide an example of the use of ATR IR spectroscopy for the probing of electronic states in semiconductor surfaces [44]-... Figure Bl.22.4. Differential IR absorption spectra from a metal-oxide silicon field-effect transistor (MOSFET) as a fiinction of gate voltage (or inversion layer density, n, which is the parameter reported in the figure). Clear peaks are seen in these spectra for the 0-1, 0-2 and 0-3 inter-electric-field subband transitions that develop for charge carriers when confined to a narrow (<100 A) region near the oxide-semiconductor interface. The inset shows a schematic representation of the attenuated total reflection (ATR) arrangement used in these experiments. These data provide an example of the use of ATR IR spectroscopy for the probing of electronic states in semiconductor surfaces [44]-...
Our intention is to give a brief survey of advanced theoretical methods used to detennine the electronic and geometric stmcture of solids and surfaces. The electronic stmcture encompasses the energies and wavefunctions (and other properties derived from them) of the electronic states in solids, while the geometric stmcture refers to the equilibrium atomic positions. Quantities that can be derived from the electronic stmcture calculations include the electronic (electron energies, charge densities), vibrational (phonon spectra), stmctiiral (lattice constants, equilibrium stmctiires), mechanical (bulk moduli, elastic constants) and optical (absorption, transmission) properties of crystals. We will also report on teclmiques used to study solid surfaces, with particular examples drawn from chemisorption on transition metal surfaces. [Pg.2201]

In SXAPS the X-ray photons emitted by the sample are detected, normally by letting them strike a photosensitive surface from which photoelectrons are collected, but also - with the advent of X-ray detectors of increased sensitivity - by direct detection. Above the X-ray emission threshold from a particular core level the excitation probability is a function of the densities of unoccupied electronic states. Because two electrons are involved, incident and the excited, the shape of the spectral structure is proportional to the self convolution of the unoccupied state densities. [Pg.274]

The extremely favorable resolution is due to the turmeling phenomenon that is possible if empty electron states of the surface overlap with filled states at the tip, or vice versa. Thus, what is depicted in an STM experiment is not the atom but merely the density of states around the Fermi level. [Pg.163]

Consider an atom approaching the surface in Fig. 6.23. If the upper level of the atom originally contained an electron, then upon adsorption it will transfer part of this electron density to the metal and become positively charged. This is the case with alkali atoms. The atom forms a dipole with the positive end towards the outside, which counteracts the double layer that constitutes the surface contribution to the work function of the metal (Fig. 6.13). Thus alkali atoms reduce the work function of a metal surface simply because they all have a high-lying s electron state that tends to donate charge to the metal surface. [Pg.244]

Figure 4.6 Left STM image of a stoichiometric 1 x 1 Ti02(l 1 0) surface, 14A x 14 A. Sample bias + 1.6 V, tunneling current 0.38 nA. The inset shows a ball-and-stick model of the unrelaxed 1 x 1 Ti02(l 1 0) surface. Rows of bridging oxygen atoms are labeled A and rows of fivefold coordinated titaniums B . Right contour plots of [0 1 l]-averaged charge densities associated with electron states within... Figure 4.6 Left STM image of a stoichiometric 1 x 1 Ti02(l 1 0) surface, 14A x 14 A. Sample bias + 1.6 V, tunneling current 0.38 nA. The inset shows a ball-and-stick model of the unrelaxed 1 x 1 Ti02(l 1 0) surface. Rows of bridging oxygen atoms are labeled A and rows of fivefold coordinated titaniums B . Right contour plots of [0 1 l]-averaged charge densities associated with electron states within...
Here, we pointed to the problem of theoretical representation, in particular, in two aspects of theory (i) the existence of highly mobile atoms at the surface such as hydrogen, which are usually not considered in the atomistic models and (ii) the importance of bandgaps and relative energy levels of electronic states, which is often distorted in local density approximations. In both respects, a quick fix to the problem is not very likely. However, as both theory and experiment continue to be developed and applied in common research projects, it can be expected that the actual understanding of the processes involved in reaction on model catalysts will substantially improve over the next 10 years. After all, the ability to trace reactions and to account for the position and charge state of each reactant is already a realization of what seemed 20 years ago a fiction rather than fact. [Pg.115]

It is important to note that as early as 1931, the density of electronic states in metals, the distribution of electronic states of ions in solution, and the effect of adsorption of species on metal electrode surfaces on activation barriers were adequately taken into account in the seminal Gurney-Butler nonquadratic quantum mechanical treatments, which provide excellent agreement with the observed current-overpotential dependence. [Pg.85]

Recently, we have studied the effect of the surface density of states on the charge-transfer probability, in the case where the surface possesses localized states created by surface perturbations or the presence of adatoms. For the tight-binding linear chain these perturbations or adatoms are taken into account by changing the electronic energy of the end atom of the chain to a, which differs from the energy a of the other atoms in the chain. This difference can lead to the formation of a localized surface state, whose energy is... [Pg.362]

The semiconductor surface where the Fermi level is pinned at a surface state of high density (Fig. 2-31) is in the state of degeneracy of electron levels, because of the high electron state density at the surface Fermi level. Similarly, the surface degeneracy is also established when the band bending becomes so great that the Fermi level is pinned either in the conduction band or in the valence band as shown in Fig. 2-32. [Pg.44]

Since the electron state density near the Fermi level at the degenerated surface (Fermi level pinning) is so high as to be comparable with that of metals, the Fermi level pinning at the surface state, at the conduction band, or at the valence band, is often called the quasi-metallization of semiconductor surfaces. As is described in Chap. 8, the quasi-metallized surface occasionally plays an important role in semiconductor electrode reactions. [Pg.44]

The scanning tunneling microscope uses an atomically sharp probe tip to map contours of the local density of electronic states on the surface. This is accomplished by monitoring quantum transmission of electrons between the tip and substrate while piezoelectric devices raster the tip relative to the substrate, as shown schematically in Fig. 1 [38]. The remarkable vertical resolution of the device arises from the exponential dependence of the electron tunneling process on the tip-substrate separation, d. In the simplest approximation, the tunneling current, 1, can be simply written in terms of the local density of states (LDOS), ps(z,E), at the Fermi level (E = Ep) of the sample, where V is the bias voltage between the tip and substrate... [Pg.213]

Due to the large-level density of the lower-lying adiabatic electronic state, the chances of a back transfer of the adiabatic population are quite small for a multidimensional molecular system. To a good approximation, one may therefore assume that subsequent to an electronic transition a random walker will stay on the lower adiabatic potential-energy surface [175]. This observation suggests a physically appealing computational scheme to calculate the time evolution of the system for longer times. First, the initial decay of the adiabatic population is calculated within the QCL approach up to a time to, when the... [Pg.299]


See other pages where Electron states surface density is mentioned: [Pg.132]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.1678]    [Pg.2391]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.264]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.382 ]




SEARCH



Electron state density

Electron “surface states

SURFACE DENSITY

State density

States electronic density

Surface electron density

Surface electron density of states

Surface electronic

Surface electrons

Surface states

Surface-state density

© 2024 chempedia.info