Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron repulsion integrals and

Figure 9. Determination of the first electron affinity, and the first and higher ionization potentials of formyl radical from the SCF orbital energies and electronic repulsion integrals, and K,j (cf. eqs. (90), (92), and (93)). The experimental value (112), 9.88 eV, for the first ionization potential corresponds to the theoretical value I . All entries are given in eV. With A and I a lower index stands for MO the upper one indicates the state multiplicity after ionization. Figure 9. Determination of the first electron affinity, and the first and higher ionization potentials of formyl radical from the SCF orbital energies and electronic repulsion integrals, and K,j (cf. eqs. (90), (92), and (93)). The experimental value (112), 9.88 eV, for the first ionization potential corresponds to the theoretical value I . All entries are given in eV. With A and I a lower index stands for MO the upper one indicates the state multiplicity after ionization.
The largest arrays which occur in calculations are of two types. One arises from the electron repulsion integrals and grows in size like the fourth power of the number of basis functions. The other is the configuration interaction hamiltonian matrix which grows like the square of the number of configurations. Many other smaller arrays, whose size is proportional to the square of the number of basis functions, occur throughout the calculation. [Pg.45]

Each element of the electron repulsion matrix G has eight 2-electron repulsion integrals, and of these 32 there appear to be 14 different ones ... [Pg.219]

The LCAO methods can treat all electrons and need not make shape approximations to the potential. However, as for Hartree-Fock band calculations, there is a very large number of electron-electron repulsion integrals, and care must be taken in truncating their sums. A number of... [Pg.124]

An approximate or semiempirical Hartree-Fock molecular-orbital method, utilizing approximate electron repulsion integrals and some Hamiltonian matrix elements to solve approximate HF equations and iterate to self-eonsistency... [Pg.455]

P. M. W. Gill, M. Head-Gordon, and J. A. Pople, J. Phys. Chem., 94,5564 (1990). Efficient Computation of Two-Electron-Repulsion Integrals and Their th-Order Derivatives Using Contracted Gaussian Basis Sets. [Pg.303]

The use of Gaussian functions directly in eqn ( I.B.IO) would therefore metke excessive requirements of storage for the electron-repulsion integrals and so a compromise is used whereby the length of the explicit expansion in eqn ( I.B.IO) is restricted by taking the basis functions themselves to be fixed linear combination of so-called Primitive Gaussians rfy. [Pg.26]

Overall, the universal choice for flexibility is the first method the storage of the value of an electron-repulsion integral and its four labels. [Pg.532]

Any molecular integral that involves the integration over one or more pairs of different spin factors is zero. Conversely all those integrals which involve the integration of only pairs of identical spin factors are non-zero (at least by spin integration ). The one-electron integrals only involve one pair of spin factors and so the situation is very simple. In the case of the electron-repulsion integrals, and the associated electron-repulsion matrices J and K, it is both physically and mathematically obvious that there must be interaction between electrons of different spin... [Pg.554]

J il and Kap are the familiar MO coulomb and exchange electron repulsion integrals, and the Hr, Grl are the average shell interactions. [Pg.142]

Table 2 Basis electron repulsion integrals and corresponding pairs of linear coefficients for various combinations of R cases and y, S, e, tj... Table 2 Basis electron repulsion integrals and corresponding pairs of linear coefficients for various combinations of R cases and y, S, e, tj...
SAMI represents somewhat of a new theoretical approach, with a different theoretical basis than previous models. The basic direction of development chosen for SAMI (discussed in more detail in SAMI) was to improve certain components of the general model from AMI, MNDO, and PM3. The two chosen were the two-electron repulsion integrals and the one-center two-electron terms. SAMI has been parameterized for a number of main group elements (C, H, O, N, F, Cl, Br, I, Si, S, P) as well as the transition metals Fe and Cu. [Pg.2579]

Most bench chemists who use software for computing quantum mechanical properties, structures, and energies of molecular systems are well aware of the n bottleneck associated with the calculation of the required electron repulsion integrals and quickly find this scaling problem to be a major impediment to their studies. In Chapter 1, Christian Ochsenfeld, Jorg Kussmann, and Daniel Lambrecht provide a tutorial on the topic of linear scaling methods... [Pg.492]

Table IIL Electron repulsion integrals and linear coefficients (/1/2) for the (A8T=1 1) case... Table IIL Electron repulsion integrals and linear coefficients (/1/2) for the (A8T=1 1) case...

See other pages where Electron repulsion integrals and is mentioned: [Pg.28]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.178]   


SEARCH



Electron repulsion integral

Electron repulsion integrals integral

Electronic integral

Electronic integration

Electronic integrators and

Electronic repulsion

Electrons repulsion and

Integrated electronics

Repulsion integral

© 2024 chempedia.info