Configuration interaction Hamiltonian

The largest arrays which occur in calculations are of two types. One arises from the electron repulsion integrals and grows in size like the fourth power of the number of basis functions. The other is the configuration interaction hamiltonian matrix which grows like the square of the number of configurations. Many other smaller arrays, whose size is proportional to the square of the number of basis functions, occur throughout the calculation. 

We now introduce creation and annihilation operators ajj and an which create/annihilate e-h pairs at a given combination of sites n = (n, n1), i.e., 41°) = 14 = nen h), where 0) is the ground state. Using these operators, a generic monoexcitation configuration interaction Hamiltonian can be formulated as follows in second quantization notation,... 

The energies of the unperturbed (sub)states have been defined above. Ha is the configuration interaction Hamiltonian, which describes essentially the electron-electron interaction [128]. The off-diagonal terms are taken as the perturbation. The aim of this discussion is, at least for this simple model, to present the structure of the corresponding perturbational formulas. For example, it will be shown that different energy denominators occur, which are connected to the different states involved. In this model, we neglect any diagonal contributions to the model Hamilton operator and treat the matrix elements as real for simplicity. 

We have described a mixed MOVB model for describing the potential energy surface of reactive systems, and presented results from applications to SN2 reactions in aqueous solution. The MOVB model is based on a BLW method to define diabatic electronic state functions. Then, a configuration interaction Hamiltonian is constructed using these diabatic VB states as basis functions. The computed geometrical and energetic results for these systems are in accord with previous experimental and theoretical studies. These studies show that the MOVB model can be adequately used as a mapping potential to derive solvent reaction coordinates for... 

The next step might be to perform a configuration interaction calculation, in order to get a more accurate representation of the excited states. We touched on this for dihydrogen in an earlier chapter. To do this, we take linear combinations of the 10 states given above, and solve a 10 x 10 matrix eigenvalue problem to find the expansion coefficients. The diagonal elements of the Hamiltonian matrix are given above (equation 8.7), and it turns out that there is a simplification. 

On the basis of the optimized ground-slate geometries, we simulate the absorption speetra by combining the scmicmpirical Hartree-Fock Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap (INDO) Hamiltonian to a Single Configuration Interaction... 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

We can now consider explicitly how configurations interact to produce electronic states. Our first task is to define the Hamiltonian operator. In order to simplify our analysis, we adopt a Hamiltonian which consists of only one electron terms and we set out to develop electronic states which arise from one electron configuration mixing. 

Apparently, a large number of successful relativistic configuration-interaction (RCI) and multi-reference Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MRDHF) calculations [27] reported over the last two decades are supposedly based on the DBC Hamiltonian. This apparent success seems to contradict the earlier claims of the CD. As shown by Sucher [18,28], in fact the RCI and MRDHF calculations are not based on the DBC Hamiltonian, but on an approximation to a more fundamental Hamiltonian based on QED which does not suffer from the CD. At this point, let us defer further discussion until we review the many-fermion Hamiltonians derived from QED. 

The aim of our similarity-transformed Hamiltonian is to improve the computation of the correlation energy of conventional configuration-interaction (Cl) calculations. In this framework, the conventional wave function is multiplied by the correlation function 14,15,16)... 

---