Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Integrals electron repulsion

IlyperChem uses 16 bytes (two double-precision words) of storage for each electron repulsion integral. The first 8 bytes save thecom-pressed four indices and the second S bytes store the value of the integral. Each index lakes 16 bits. Thus the maximum number of basis fiinctions is 65,535. This should satisfy all users of IlyperChem for the foreseeable future. [Pg.263]

III fact, while this correction gives the desired behaviour at relatively long separations, it doLS not account for the fact that as two nuclei approach each other the screening by the core electrons decreases. As the separation approaches zero the core-core repulsion iimild be described by Coulomb s law. In MINDO/3 this is achieved by making the cure-core interaction a function of the electron-electron repulsion integrals as follows ... [Pg.115]

Using Program SCF for ethylene and 1,3,5-hexatriene, list the electron repulsion integrals in the foiiii Yjj, Yj2, and so on. Take the coordinates from Figure 8-6. Try small variations in the atomic coordinates to see what their influence is on Yy. [Pg.260]

The calculation of the two-electron repulsion integrals in ab initio method is inevitable and time-consuming. The computational time is mainly dominated by the performance of the two-electron integral calculation. The following items can control the performance of the two-electron integrals. [Pg.113]

Set this threshold to a small positive constant (the default value is 10" ° Hartree). This threshold is used by HyperChem to ignore all two-electron repulsion integrals with an absolute value less than this value. This option controls the performance of the SCF iterations and the accuracy of the wave function and energies since it can decrease the number of calculated two-electron integrals. [Pg.113]

The NDDO (Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap) approximation is the basis for the MNDO, AMI, and PM3 methods. In addition to the integralsused in the INDO methods, they have an additional class of electron repulsion integrals. This class includes the overlap density between two orbitals centered on the same atom interacting with the overlap density between two orbitals also centered on a single (but possibly different) atom. This is a significant step toward calculatin g th e effects of electron -electron in teraction s on different atoms. [Pg.128]

Because of the use of two double-precision words for each integral, HyperChem needs, for example, about 44 MBytes of computer main memory and/or disk space to store the electron repulsion integrals for benzene with a double-zeta 6-3IG basis set. [Pg.264]

The two-center two-electron repulsion integrals ( AV Arr) represents the energy of interaction between the charge distributions at atom Aand at atom B. Classically, they are equal to the sum over all interactions between the multipole moments of the two charge contributions, where the subscripts I and m specify the order and orientation of the multipole. MNDO uses the classical model in calculating these two-center two-electron interactions. [Pg.286]

The term ( iv X.o) in Equation 32 signifies the two-electron repulsion integrals. Under the Hartree-Fock treatment, each electron sees all of the other electrons as an average distribution there is no instantaneous electron-electron interaction included. Higher level methods attempt to remedy this neglect of electron correlation in various ways, as we shall see. [Pg.264]

Electron-electron repulsion integrals, 28 Electrons bonding, 14, 18-19 electron-electron repulsion, 8 inner-shell core, 4 ionization energy of, 10 localization of, 16 polarization of, 75 Schroedinger equation for, 2 triplet spin states, 15-16 valence, core-valence separation, 4 wave functions of, 4,15-16 Electrostatic fields, of proteins, 122 Electrostatic interactions, 13, 87 in enzymatic reactions, 209-211,225-228 in lysozyme, 158-161,167-169 in metalloenzymes, 200-207 in proteins ... [Pg.230]

The first summation requires electron repulsion integrals with four virtuaJ indices. Efficient algorithms that avoid the storage of these integrals have been discussed in detail [20]. For every orbital index, p, this OV contraction must be repeated for each energy considered in the pole search it is usually the computational bottleneck. [Pg.42]

Figure 9. Determination of the first electron affinity, and the first and higher ionization potentials of formyl radical from the SCF orbital energies and electronic repulsion integrals, and K,j (cf. eqs. (90), (92), and (93)). The experimental value (112), 9.88 eV, for the first ionization potential corresponds to the theoretical value I . All entries are given in eV. With A and I a lower index stands for MO the upper one indicates the state multiplicity after ionization. Figure 9. Determination of the first electron affinity, and the first and higher ionization potentials of formyl radical from the SCF orbital energies and electronic repulsion integrals, and K,j (cf. eqs. (90), (92), and (93)). The experimental value (112), 9.88 eV, for the first ionization potential corresponds to the theoretical value I . All entries are given in eV. With A and I a lower index stands for MO the upper one indicates the state multiplicity after ionization.
In this latter formula, the two electron repulsion integral is written following Mulliken convention and the one electron integrals are grouped in the matrix e. In this way, the one-electron terms of the Hamiltonian are grouped together with the two electron ones into a two electron matrix. Here, the matrix is used only in order to render a more compact formalism. [Pg.57]

With the intermediate NDO method ZDO is not assumed between a.o. s on the same atom in one-centre electron repulsion integrals. Various other schemes based on different ZDO assumptions together with different schemes of semi-empirical parametrization have been developed. These have become known by their acronyms such as CNDO/1, CNDO/2, INDO, MINDO/3 (m - modified), NDDO (d - diatomic), MNDO etc.. [Pg.386]

In the spirit of the Huckel-Wheland theory, the Mulliken approximation for electron repulsion integrals 53) is used in the maximization of the localization sum (Eq. (28)). The details of the calculations are reported elsewhere. S4)... [Pg.58]

Diagonal matrix elements of the P3 self-energy approximation may be expressed in terms of canonical Hartree-Fock orbital energies and electron repulsion integrals in this basis. For ionization energies, where the index p pertains to an occupied spinorbital in the Hartree-Fock determinant,... [Pg.136]

The electron repulsion integral is the more straightforward of the two )tential integrals. It should be re< the integral, using (43), becomes... [Pg.438]


See other pages where Integrals electron repulsion is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.439]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 , Pg.170 , Pg.174 , Pg.176 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 ]




SEARCH



Electron repulsion integrals and

Electron repulsion integrals definitions

Electron repulsion integrals implementation

Electron repulsion integrals integral

Electron repulsion integrals integral

Electron repulsion integrals rapid calculation

Electronic integral

Electronic integration

Electronic repulsion

Fundamental Electron-Repulsion Integral

Integrated electronics

Repulsion integral

Two-electron repulsion integrals

© 2024 chempedia.info