Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Election transfer energy

Figure 9.29 Photo-induced spin crossover in transition metal ions (a) incident photons can successively promote electrons from the ground t2g state to the high-energy eg state and (b) spin crossover involving election transfer and excitation in KFeCo(CN)6-... Figure 9.29 Photo-induced spin crossover in transition metal ions (a) incident photons can successively promote electrons from the ground t2g state to the high-energy eg state and (b) spin crossover involving election transfer and excitation in KFeCo(CN)6-...
Diffused reflectance spectra in the UV-VIS region were examined to characterize the structure of vanadium species supported on the AIPO -S surface. The value of the election-charge-transfer energy was reported to be strongly influenced by the number of ligands of the central vanadium ions and give information on the symmetry of the vanadium ions in the clusters [21,22]. [Pg.183]

Figure 17-2 (cr) Schematic energy profile for election transfer from a metal to H30. leading to liberation of H2- (b) Applying a potential to the metal raises the energy of the electron in the metal and decreases the activation energy for electron transfer. [Pg.351]

Photopolymerization of acrylamide by the uranyl ion is said to be induced by electron transfer or energy transfer of the excited uranyl ion with the monomer (37, 38). Uranyl nitrate can photosensitize the polymerization of /S-propiolactone (39) which is polymerized by cationic or anionic mechanism but not by radical. The initiation mechanism is probably electron transfer from /S-propiolactone to the uranyl ion, producing a cation radical which propagates as a cation. Complex formation of uranyl nitrate with the monomer was confirmed by electronic spectroscopy. Polymerization of /J-propiolactone is also photosensitized by sodium chloroaurate (30). Similar to photosensitization by uranyl nitrate, an election transfer process leading to cationic propagation has been suggested. [Pg.338]

Self-assembled and spontaneously adsorbed monolayers offer a facile means of controlling the chemical composition and physical structure of a surface. As discussed later in Chapter 5, applications of these monolayers include modeling election transfer reactions, biomimetic membranes, nano-scale photonic devices, solar energy conversion, catalysis, chemical sensing and nano-scale lithography. [Pg.96]

Even though energy and electron transfer reactions using complexes such as [Ru(bpy)3] have been shown to occur with significant success, the effici cy of any bimolecular en gy or electron transfer reaction is limited by the necessity for the light absorber to come into contact with a suitable quencher during the excited state of the light absorber. These processes are also limited by back election transfer. These facts have sparked the interest in polymetallic supramolecular systems. [Pg.155]

The outer-sphere theory has been developed using an electrostatic approach to calculate the energy necessary to bring reactants together, to reorganize the solvent around the transition state and to prepare the metal centers for election transfer. [Pg.256]

As it has already been pointed out, electronic excitation modifies the redox potentials of chemical compounds [32]. Generally, electron transfer is facilitated when electronic excitation is involved. The Rehm-Weller equation (Eq. 29.1) [33] enables an estimation of the exothermicity of a photochemical electron transfer (free enthalpy of electron transfer AG ). Even when the electron transfer at the ground state ( (D+/D)- (A/A )) is endothermic, this may be compensated by the excitation energy E. The attraction of the resulting ions is given by the term w, which is derived from Coulomb s law. It is reduced when reactions are carried out in a polar reaction medium, thus stabilizing the ions with respect to back election transfer. Most frequently, in the case of organic... [Pg.842]

Figure 2. Envelope of the absorption edge part of the differential cross section dajdo scaled in 0 3 a.u. as a function of energy transfer scaled in units of 1000 for an electrical field strength of F = 1 a.u or vector potential A = 3186 a.u.. The initial election energy is W = 100 a.u.. The solid line denotes the result for electrons, the short dashed one the differential cross section for spinless particles and the long dashed one the result for the nonrelativistic limit. Figure 2. Envelope of the absorption edge part of the differential cross section dajdo scaled in 0 3 a.u. as a function of energy transfer scaled in units of 1000 for an electrical field strength of F = 1 a.u or vector potential A = 3186 a.u.. The initial election energy is W = 100 a.u.. The solid line denotes the result for electrons, the short dashed one the differential cross section for spinless particles and the long dashed one the result for the nonrelativistic limit.
In the Compton effect, the photon interacts with an election of an ion in the solid and transfers part of its eneigy to this electron. The result is a Compton scattered photon with energy hr> (v < v) and a so-called Compton electron with energy Ej. The scattered photon may leave the scintillator or may interact with the scintillator (but at a site different from the first interaction). In the latter case the incident photon gives two light centers at different sites which makes the Compton effect undesirable for po.sition-sensitive detection. If the scattered photon leaves the scintillator crystal, less luminescent radiation is produced than in the case of the photoelectric effect. [Pg.171]

Figure 11.25. Photocurrent dependence on the Gibbs free energy of electron transfer for the photo-oxidation of ferrocene derivatives (a) and photoreduction of quinone-type molecules (h) at the water/DCE interface. AG ( is evaluated from Equation (11.47), employing the formal redox potentials summarised in Table 11.1 and the applied Galvani potential difference. A deconvolution of the photocurrent relaxation in the presence of the electron acceptors was performed in order to estimate the flux of election injection g. The second-order rate constant for the photoninduced heterogeneous electron transfer is also calculated assuming values of 1 nm for dec and 5 x 10 s for A ,. The trends observed in both set of data were rationahsed in terms of a single solvent reorganisation energy and activation-less limit for the rate constant. Reprinted with permission from refs.[101] and [60]. Copyright (2002/2003) American Chemical Society. Figure 11.25. Photocurrent dependence on the Gibbs free energy of electron transfer for the photo-oxidation of ferrocene derivatives (a) and photoreduction of quinone-type molecules (h) at the water/DCE interface. AG ( is evaluated from Equation (11.47), employing the formal redox potentials summarised in Table 11.1 and the applied Galvani potential difference. A deconvolution of the photocurrent relaxation in the presence of the electron acceptors was performed in order to estimate the flux of election injection g. The second-order rate constant for the photoninduced heterogeneous electron transfer is also calculated assuming values of 1 nm for dec and 5 x 10 s for A ,. The trends observed in both set of data were rationahsed in terms of a single solvent reorganisation energy and activation-less limit for the rate constant. Reprinted with permission from refs.[101] and [60]. Copyright (2002/2003) American Chemical Society.
The common sense tells us that nothing like this could happen with the electron, because, firstly, the election could not pass through both slits, and, secondly, unlike the waves, the electron has hit a tiny spot on the screen (transferring its energy). Let us repeat the experiment with a sin e slit. The electrons... [Pg.41]

The energy released in a spontaneous redox reaction can be used to perform electrical work. This task is accomplished through a voltaic (or galvanic) cell, a device in which flie transfer of elections takes place through an external patiiway rather than directly between reactants. [Pg.784]


See other pages where Election transfer energy is mentioned: [Pg.234]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.1877]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.1287]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.1038]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.258]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.183 , Pg.184 ]




SEARCH



Election transfer

Electivity

© 2024 chempedia.info