Dropping mercury electrode currents

Figure 3. Typical polarogram—dodecylbenzyldimethylsul-fonium chloride, in LON KCl, dropping mercury electrode current full scale 5 Halfwave potentials, —1.02 V —1.13 V, major wave, one electron transfer —1.44V.

Stripping voltammetry involves the pre-concentration of the analyte species at the electrode surface prior to the voltannnetric scan. The pre-concentration step is carried out under fixed potential control for a predetennined time, where the species of interest is accumulated at the surface of the working electrode at a rate dependent on the applied potential. The detemiination step leads to a current peak, the height and area of which is proportional to the concentration of the accumulated species and hence to the concentration in the bulk solution. The stripping step can involve a variety of potential wavefomis, from linear-potential scan to differential pulse or square-wave scan. Different types of stripping voltaimnetries exist, all of which coimnonly use mercury electrodes (dropping mercury electrodes (DMEs) or mercury film electrodes) [7, 17]. 

Electrochemical reduction of iridium solutions in the presence azodye (acid chrome dark blue [ACDB]) on slowly dropping mercury electrode is accompanied by occurrence of additional peaks on background acetic-ammonium buffer solutions except for waves of reduction azodye. Potentials of these peaks are displaced to cathode region of the potential compared to the respective peaks of reduction of the azodye. The nature of reduction current in iridium solutions in the presence ACDB is diffusive with considerable adsorptive limitations. The method of voltamiuetric determination of iridium with ACDB has been developed (C 1-2 x 10 mol/L). 

Both lead ion and dichromate ion yield a diffusion current at an applied potential to a dropping mercury electrode of —1.0 volt against the saturated calomel electrode (S.C.E.). Amperometric titration gives a V-shaped curve [Fig. 16.14 (C)]. The exercise described refers to the determination of lead in lead nitrate the application to the determination of lead in dilute aqueous solutions (10-3 — 10-4lVf) is self-evident. 

The titrations so far discussed in this chapter have been concerned with the use of a reference electrode (usually S.C.E.), in conjunction with a polarised electrode (dropping mercury electrode or rotating platinum micro-electrode). Titrations may also be performed in a uniformly stirred solution by using two small but similar platinum electrodes to which a small e.m.f. (1-100 millivolts) is applied the end point is usually shown by either the disappearance or the appearance of a current flowing between the two electrodes. For the method to be applicable the only requirement is that a reversible oxidation-reduction system be present either before or after the end point. 

Copper(II) ions in the presence of chloride ions are reduced at the dropping mercury electrode (dme) in two steps, Cu(II) -> Cu(I) and Cu(I) -> Cu(0) producing a double wave at -1-0.04 and 0.22 V versus sce half-wave potentials. In the presence of peroxydisulphate , when the chloride concentration is large enough, two waves are also observed the first limiting current corresponds to the reduction of the Cu(II) to Cu(I) plus reduction of a fraction of peroxydisulphate and the total diffusion current at a more negative potential is equal to the sum of the diffusion currents of reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(0) and of the peroxydisulphate. There is evidence that peroxydisulphate is not reduced at the potential of the first wave because of the adsorption of the copper(I) chloride complex at... 

In voltammetry as an analytical method based on measurement of the voltage-current curve we can distinguish between techniques with non-stationary and with stationary electrodes. Within the first group the technique at the dropping mercury electrode (dme), the so-called polarography, is by far the most important within the second group it is of particular significance to state whether and when the analyte is stirred. 

This equation is analogous to Eq. (5.4.18) or (5.4.19) for the steady-state current density, although the instantaneous current depends on time. Thus, the results for a stationary polarization curve (Eqs (5.4.18) to (5.4.32)) can also be used as a satisfactory approximation even for electrolysis with the dropping mercury electrode, where the mean current must be considered... 

Fig. 5.46 The dependence on time of the instantaneous current / at a dropping mercury electrode in a solution of 0.08 m Co(NH3)6C13 + 0.1 m H2SO4 + 0.5m K2S04 at the electrode potential where -7 -/d (i.e. the influence of diffusion of the electroactive substance is negligible) (1) in the absence of surfactant (2) after addition of 0.08% polyvinyl alcohol. The dashed curve has been calculated according to Eq. (5.7.23). (According to J. Kuta and I.

Mishra and Gode developed a direct current polarographic method for the quantitative determination of niclosamide in tablets using individually three different buffer systems, namely Mcllraine s buffers (pH 2.20 8.00), borate buffers (pH 7.80—10.00), and Britton Robinson s buffers (pH 2.00—12.00) as well as 0.2 M sodium hydroxide. The drug was extracted from the sample with methanol, appropriate buffer was added to an aliquot and the solution then polarographed at the dropping-mercury electrode versus saturated calomel electrode at 25°C [36], The resultant two-step reduction waves observed were irreversible and diffusion-controlled. For the quantitative determination, the method of standard addition was used. Niclosamide can be determined up to a level of 5—10 pg/mL. 

Up until the mid-1940s, most physical electrochemistry was based around the dropping mercury electrode. However, in 1942, Levich showed that rotating a disc-shaped electrode in a liquid renders it uniformly accessible to diffusion, yet the hydrodynamics of the liquid flow are soluble and the kinetic equations relatively simple. In addition, in contrast to the case of a stationary planar electrode, the current at an RDE rapidly attains a steady-state value. 

Voltammetry is a part of the repertoire of dynamic electrochemical techniques for the study of redox (reduction-oxidation) reactions through current-voltage relationships. Experimentally, the current response (i, the signal) is obtained by the applied voltage (.E, the excitation) in a suitable electrochemical cell. Polarography is a special form of voltammetry where redox reactions are studied with a dropping mercury electrode (DME). Polarography was the first dynamic electrochemical technique developed by J. Heyrovsky in 1922. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this discovery. 

Polarography is the measurement of the current flowing at a dropping mercury electrode as the potential applied to this electrode is changed. Voltammetry is the measurement of the current flowing at a stationary electrode as the potential applied to this electrode is changed. 

The current at a dropping-mercury electrode (DME) is a function of potential, as described by the Heyrovsky-Ilkovic equation (equation (6.6)). At less extreme overpotentials, the current rises from zero to a maximum. The potential at which... 

Figure 1.7. Current versus time profile for an electrochemical reaction under polarographic conditions at a dropping mercury electrode, drop time 3 s.

Kariuki and Dewald [55] have studied current oscillations accompanying reduction of indium(III) and gallium(III) in diluted chloride and nitrate solutions at a dropping mercury electrode. 

In a polarographic experiment, a potential difference E is applied across the cell consisting of the dropping-mercury electrode and a nonpolarizable interface (e.g., a calomel electrode). In response to this potential difference, a current density i flows across the drop/solution interface. As each drop grows and falls, however, the surface area of the drop also grows, and then becomes effectively zero when the drop falls. Thus, the instantaneous current (current density times surface area) shows fluctuations, but the mean current is a unique function of the potential difference across the drop/solution interface, and therefore of that across the cell. 

---