Droplet flame

FIGURE 6.15 Effect of chemical rate processes on the structure of a diffusion-controlled droplet flame (after Lorell et al. [22]). 

This situation, as discussed in the last section, closely resembles that of the droplet diffusion flame, in which the oxygen concentration approaches zero at the flame front. Now, however, the flame front is at the particle surface and there is no fuel volatility. Of course, the droplet flame discussed earlier had a specified spherical geometry and was in a quiescent atmosphere. Thus, hD must contain the transfer number term because the surface regresses and the carbon oxide formed will diffuse away from the surface. For the diffusion-controlled case, however, one need not proceed through the conductance hD, as the system developed earlier is superior. 

The yield of soot for the dispersed injection mode was found to be affected by gas stoichiometry in the opposite direction to the effect on non-dispersed injection. As seen in Figure 4 for the SRC-II heavy distillate, the soot concentration was increased by leaner overall gas conditions. Such measurements are consistent with observations of attached flames and higher temperatures within the droplet flame under leaner conditions (1,2) both of which can promote droplet soot. These are also consistent with physical observation made in this study. 

Since a planar flame is absolutely unstable to small disturbances (86,87,88), the small radii of curvature usually associated with droplet flames in general tend to stabihze these flames. Indeed, available experimental observations on droplet combustion do seem to indicate that they are stable. 

This demonstrates a quadratic dependence of burnout on the diameter of the initial liquid droplet. For burning droplets, the droplet flame front acts as a nearby source of heat for droplet vaporization, otherwise the mechanism is the same as pure vaporization. For a singlecomponent, uniform droplet burning under quasi-steady gas-phase conditions... 

Furthermore, the burning behaviour of the nanocomposites has been visually observed. It was found out that PCL nanocomposites exhibit remarkable flame retardant properties. Although unfilled PCL and PCL-based microcomposites (PCL filled with Cloisite Na ) continuously release burning droplets (flamed dripping) able to propagate the fire to surrounding materials when they are exposed to flame, PCL nanocomposites (obtained... 

To examine a sample by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP/MS) or inductively coupled plasma atomic-emission spectroscopy (ICP/AES) the sample must be transported into the flame of a plasma torch. Once in the flame, sample molecules are literally ripped apart to form ions of their constituent elements. These fragmentation and ionization processes are described in Chapters 6 and 14. To introduce samples into the center of the (plasma) flame, they must be transported there as gases, as finely dispersed droplets of a solution, or as fine particulate matter. The various methods of sample introduction are described here in three parts — A, B, and C Chapters 15, 16, and 17 — to cover gases, solutions (liquids), and solids. Some types of sample inlets are multipurpose and can be used with gases and liquids or with liquids and solids, but others have been designed specifically for only one kind of analysis. However, the principles governing the operation of inlet systems fall into a small number of categories. This chapter discusses specifically substances that are normally liquids at ambient temperatures. This sort of inlet is the commonest in analytical work. 

The nebulization concept has been known for many years and is commonly used in hair and paint spays and similar devices. Greater control is needed to introduce a sample to an ICP instrument. For example, if the highest sensitivities of detection are to be maintained, most of the sample solution should enter the flame and not be lost beforehand. The range of droplet sizes should be as small as possible, preferably on the order of a few micrometers in diameter. Large droplets contain a lot of solvent that, if evaporated inside the plasma itself, leads to instability in the flame, with concomitant variations in instrument sensitivity. Sometimes the flame can even be snuffed out by the amount of solvent present because of interference with the basic mechanism of flame propagation. For these reasons, nebulizers for use in ICP mass spectrometry usually combine a means of desolvating the initial spray of droplets so that they shrink to a smaller, more uniform size or sometimes even into small particles of solid matter (particulates). 

These factors make it necessary to reduce the amount of solvent vapor entering the flame to as low a level as possible and to make any droplets or particulates entering the flame as small and of as uniform a droplet size as possible. Desolvation chambers are designed to optimize these factors so as to maintain a near-constant efficiency of ionization and to flatten out fluctuations in droplet size from the nebulizer. Droplets of less than 10 pm in diameter are preferred. For flow rates of less than about 10 pl/min issuing from micro- or nanobore liquid chromatography columns, a desolvation chamber is unlikely to be needed. 

Solutions can be examined by ICP/MS by (a) removing the solvent (direct and electrothermal methods) and then vaporizing residual sample solute or (b) nebulizing the sample solution into a spray of droplets that is swept into the plasma flame after passing through a desolvation chamber, where excess solvent is removed. The direct and electrothermal methods are not as convenient as the nebulization inlets for multiple samples, but the former are generally much more efficient in transferring samples into the flame for analysis. 

In some cases, it may be convenient to dissolve a solid and present it for analysis as a solution that can be nebulized and sprayed as an aerosol (mixed droplets and vapor) into the plasma flame. This aspect of analysis is partly covered in Part B (Chapter 16), which describes the introduction of solutions. There are vaporization techniques for solutions of solids other than nebulization, but since these require prior evaporation of the solvent, they are covered here. There are also many solid samples that need to be analyzed directly, and this chapter describes commonly used methods to do so. 

The various heating methods produce a vapor that is a mixture of gas, very small droplets, and small particles of solid matter (particulates). Before droplets or particulates can coalesce, the whole vapor is swept into the plasma flame for analysis. Clearly, the closer the heating source is... 

Suffice it to say at this stage that the surfaces of most solids subjected to such laser heating will be heated rapidly to very high temperatures and will vaporize as a mix of gas, molten droplets, and small particulate matter. For ICP/MS, it is then only necessary to sweep the ablated aerosol into the plasma flame using a flow of argon gas this is the basis of an ablation cell. It is usual to include a TV monitor and small camera to view the sample and to help direct the laser beam to where it is needed on the surface of the sample. 

The calculation shows how rapidly a droplet changes in diameter with time as it flows toward the plasma flame. At 40°C, a droplet loses 90% of its size within alxtut 1.5 sec, in which time the sweep gas has flowed only about 8 cm along the tube leading to the plasma flame. Typical desolvation chambers operate at 150°C and, at these temperatures, similar changes in diameter will be complete within a few milliseconds. The droplets of sample solution lose almost all of their solvent (dry out) to give only residual sample (solute) particulate matter before reaching the plasma flame. 

In a concentric-tube nebulizer, the sample solution is drawn through the inner capillary by the vacuum created when the argon gas stream flows over the end (nozzle) at high linear velocity. As the solution is drawn out, the edges of the liquid forming a film over the end of the inner capillary are blown away as a spray of droplets and solvent vapor. This aerosol may pass through spray and desolvation chambers before reaching the plasma flame. 

The aim of breaking up a thin film of liquid into an aerosol by a cross flow of gas has been developed with frits, which are essentially a means of supporting a film of liquid on a porous surface. As the liquid flows onto one surface of the frit (frequently made from glass), argon gas is forced through from the undersurface (Figure 19.16). Where the gas meets the liquid film, the latter is dispersed into an aerosol and is carried as usual toward the plasma flame. There have been several designs of frit nebulizers, but all work in a similar fashion. Mean droplet diameters are approximately 100 nm, and over 90% of the liquid sample can be transported to the flame. 

For a longitudinal disturbance of wavelength 12 pm, the droplets have a mean diameter of about 3-4 pm. These very fine droplets are ideal for ICP/MS and can be swept into the plasma flame by a flow of argon gas. Unlike pneumatic forms of nebulizer in which the relative velocities of the liquid and gas are most important in determining droplet size, the flow of gas in the ultrasonic nebulizer plays no part in the formation of the aerosol and serves merely as the droplet carrier. 

---