Droplet deposition velocity

Droplet deposition velocities of 2 to 5 cm s have been measured on grass, while forests under orographic cloud may have droplet deposition velocities of 10 to 20 cm s ... 

It is dispersed by wind and removed by gravitational settling (sedimentation), dry deposition (inertial impaction characterized by a deposition velocity), washout by rain (attachment to droplets within clouds), and rainout (scrubbing action below clouds) (Schroeder et al. 1987). The removal rate and distance traveled from the source depends on source characteristics (e.g., stack height), particle size and density, and meteorological conditions. 

In the last two columns of Table 6.4 the turbulent deposition velocities of mass and momentum are shown. For droplets, vt and vm are approximately equal, indicating that capture by the surface is efficient, and aerodynamic resistance the limiting factor. 

The pressure drop and pumping requirements are functions of the type of flow and of the rheological properties of the dispersion. If the flow rate in a pipeline falls below the critical deposit velocity then particles or emulsion droplets will either sediment or cream to form a layer on the bottom or top wall, respectively, of the pipe. Some correlations that have been developed for the prediction of critical deposit velocity are discussed by Nasr-El-Din [86] and Shook et al. [90]. 

Where the reactor circuit is breached, however, substantial quantities of fission products may well escape from the circuit to the reactor containment or auxiliary building. Further removal of fission products is then likely within the containment by deposition onto the containment walls, or upon water droplets in the containment atmosphere, and of course by radioactive decay. For fission products, other than the noble gases, deposition on walls is likely to be the dominant process, in the absence of engineered safeguards. Deposition is governed by a deposition velocity (or mass transfer coefficient) V according to the relation... 

A venturi scrubber is a venturi-shaped air passage with water introduced just ahead of or into the venturi throat. The liquid-gas contact is at a maximum in the venturi throat. The relative velocity between gas and liquid aerosol droplets is high, with the gas velocities in the range of 50-100 m/s. The particles are conditioned in the throat, and condensation is the important collection mechanism. After the particles in the gas have been deposited on droplets, a comparatively simple device such as a cyclone collector can be used to collect the wetted dust. 

In order to develop the above burn-out mechanism further, it will be necessary to know more about the entrainment and deposition processes occurring. Experimentally, it is likely that these processes will be very difficult to measure separately and under conditions comparable to those prevailing in a boiling channel. From analysis of their film flow-rate data, Staniforth et al. (S8) have deduced that under burn-out conditions, the deposition of liquid droplets from the vapor core plays an important part in reinforcing the liquid film, particularly at high mass velocities. At low mass velocities, they conclude that deposition and entrainment rates must be nearly equal, and, therefore, since a thin liquid film can be expected to be tenacious and give rise to very little entrainment, they argue that both deposition and entrainment tend to zero near the burn-out location with low mass velocities. 

Liu et aU622] used a laser Doppler velocity and size (LDVS) measurement technique to determine the local size, velocity, and number flow density of droplets in the spray cone during spray deposition of a liquid steel. The experimental setup is schematically depicted in Fig. 6.7.1615] The measured results showed that smaller... 

Mass transfer controlled by diffusion in the gas phase (ammonia in water) has been studied by Anderson et al. (A5) for horizontal annular flow. In spite of the obvious analogy of this case with countercurrent wetted-wall towers, gas velocities in the cocurrent case exceed these used in any reported wetted-wall-tower investigations. In cocurrent annular flow, smooth liquid films free of ripples are not attainable, and entrainment and deposition of liquid droplets presents an additional transfer mechanism. By measuring solute concentrations of liquid in the film and in entrained drops, as well as flow rates, and by assuming absorption equilibrium between droplets and gas, Anderson et al. were able to separate the two contributing mechanisms of transfer. The agreement of their entrainment values (based on the assumption of transfer equilibrium in the droplets) with those of Wicks and Dukler (W2) was taken as supporting evidence for this supposition. 

---