Donor-acceptor interaction, and

The chemical reactions of XY can be conveniently classified as (a) halogenation reactions, (b) donor-acceptor interactions and (c) use as solvent systems. Reactions frequently parallel those of the parent halogens but with subtle and revealing differences. CIF is an effective fluorinating agent (p. 820) and will react with many metals and non-metals either at room temperature or above, converting them to fluorides and liberating chlorine, e.g. ... 

Table 3.14. Symmetry-allowed donor acceptor interactions and NBO labels for homonuclear diatomics...

These atomic hybrids are the starting point for discussing the donor-acceptor interactions and two-center NBO formation at each R. 

Figure 3.73 Leading NBO donor-acceptor interactions (and second-order stabilization energies) in the aa conformer of the 1,2-diaminoethane cation 30+ (a) ccc cnn-6 and (b) cnn - o cc - Note that the two N lone-pair hybrids are in phase (+) in the acceptor cnn 6 (a), but out of phase ( ) in the donor ctnnX (b).

Rouse JH, Lillehei PT, Sanderson J, Siochi EJ (2004). Polymer/Single-walled carbon nanotube films assembled via donor-acceptor interactions and their use as scaffolds for silica deposition. Chem. Mat. 16 3904-3910. 

Quantitative Evaluation and Prediction of Donor-Acceptor Interactions and solving for y... 

As already seen for catenanes 134+ andl44+ (Fig. 13.15),ongoingffomseparated molecular components 16,124+, or 154+ to their catenanes substantial changes in the electrochemical behavior are expected because the electroactive units incorporated in the cyclophanes and macrocycle are engaged in donor-acceptor interactions and occupy spatially different sites. 

The ability of compounds with a quinonic structure to form donor-acceptor interactions and CT complexes is useful in regioselective halogenation of phenol (or naphthols and their derivatives). 

Our calculations predict only minor differences between the ground state dipole moments for molecules containing nitro electron acceptors versus those possessing methylsulfonyl. In contrast, the hyperpolarizabilities behave much differently, in that calculated J3Z for the aminonitrostilbenes is about twice that of the aminosulfonylstilbenes and the nitroanilines are more than 5 times more nonlinear than the sulfonylanilines. The hyperpolarizabilities appear to be very sensitive to the details of the electron donors-acceptor interaction and hence accentuate the differences in the a values for nitro and methylsulfonyl. 

While supramolecular chemistry of porphyrins has been extensively studied over the last few decades, related study of phthalocyanines is still in its infancy. Despite the great potential of phthalocyanine-based supramolecular arrays in various applications as mentioned earlier, only a handful systems have been reported so far. Self-assembled systems held by hydrogen bonding, donor-acceptor interactions, and host-guest interactions are still very rare. There is certainly much room for further investigation in the chemistry of this important class of compounds, particularly on their structural and functional aspects. We hope this article can provide the grounding for further studies. 

In a similar manner donor-acceptor [2]rotaxanes such as the derivative 213 can be assembled. This example has been described as a molecular switch. The CBPQT4+ ring can occupy two positions as shown in the translational isomers 213 and 214 (Scheme 18). At equilibrium in acetonitrile solution the CBPQT4+ ring mainly occupies the benzidine site (84%) 213. Protonation (or electrochemical oxidation) eliminates the favorable CBPQT4+/benzidine donor-acceptor interaction and results in preferential occupation of the biphenol site 214 <2008T8231>. 

Here (D, A)SK, (D, A )SK and (D, A)SK are used to designate a collision donor-acceptor complex, (D+, A )FC the photoexcited donor-acceptor complex (of the Franck-Condon type), and (D + A )s a radical ion pair where both components are separated by solvent. The frequency v, of the exciting radiation is generally different for the donors, D, complexes, DA, and acceptors, A. Each step in scheme (79) is probably reversible, and the position and rate equilibruim establishment (of which the solvation and desolvation processes are the slowest) determine the rate and effectiveness of product formation. A review of donor-acceptor interactions and of the properties of DA bonds was published, for example, in refs. [299 and 300] and in the original communication [301],... 

Silatranes 1 are meanwhile classical cage compounds with donor-acceptor interactions and represent examples of hypercoordinated silicon [2], The donor-acceptor contact in 1 is formed by an interaction of the Lewis-basic amino group with the Lewis-acidic silicon center favored by the chelate effect. Numerous examples show that electron-rich transition metal complexes also possess Lewis-basic properties [3, 4]. Isolobal replacement of the NR3-unit in 1 by a d ML4-unit [5] leads to compounds of type 2 [1,6, 7]. These Si/Ni-cages 2 can be regarded as metallosilatranes. Here we report on the s5mthesis, structure and bonding of 2. 

The molecular structures of tetraorganodistannoxanes in the solid state are characterized by (i) the ladder-type motif formally realized by dimerization via 0->-Sn donor-acceptor interactions and (ii) the almost planar Sn4X402 layer (Scheme 2.10.1). 

In addition to modulation of the general reactivity by choice of substituents with different electron demand, Umemoto and coworkers described a method of increasing the selectivity of the fluorination, particularly for phenols and aromatic urethanes in the ortho-position [183b, 190], In the reaction of N-fluoropyridinium-2-sulfonate the electrophilic fluorine is supposedly directed by a combination of Jt n donor-acceptor interaction and electrostatic (hydrogen) bonding to a specific position (Scheme 2.85). 

Strongly polar molecules form solvents with high dielectric constants that are good at solvating charged species. At a molecular level solvation involves specific donor-acceptor interactions and other types of intermolecular force. 

Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of the electronic interactions (dipole-dipole, donor-acceptor interactions and van der Vaals forces) between neighbouring chain segments having copla-nar conformations...

---