Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Distribution correction factor

The third term in Equation (11.52) is the correction factor corresponding to the work done creating the charge distribution of the solute within the cavity in the dielectric medium. the gas-phase wavefimction. [Pg.611]

When straight or serrated segmental weirs are used in a column of circiilar cross secdion, a correction may be needed for the distorted pattern of flow at the ends of the weirs, depending on liquid flow rate. The correction factor F from Fig. 14-33 is used direcdly in Eq. (14-112) or Eq. (14-119). Even when circular downcomers are utilized, they are often fed by the overflow from a segmental weir. When the weir crest over a straight segmental weir is less than 6 mm V in), it is desirable to use a serrated (notched) weir to provide good liquid distribution. Inasmuch as fabrication standards permit the tray to be 3 mm Vh in) out of level, weir crests less than 6 mm V in) can result in maldistribution of hquid flow. [Pg.1379]

Since the composition of the unknown appears in each of the correction factors, it is necessary to make an initial estimate of the composition (taken as the measured lvalue normalized by the sum of all lvalues), predict new lvalues from the composition and the ZAF correction factors, and iterate, testing the measured lvalues and the calculated lvalues for convergence. A closely related procedure to the ZAF method is the so-called ())(pz) method, which uses an analytic description of the X-ray depth distribution function determined from experimental measurements to provide a basis for calculating matrix correction factors. [Pg.185]

In some convection equations, such as for turbulent pipe flow, a special correction factor is used. This factor relates to the heat transfer conditions at the flow inlet, where the flow has not reached its final velocity distribution and the boundary layer is not fully developed. In this region the heat transfer rate is better than at the region of fully developed flow. [Pg.115]

Thus, the pressure has a maximum at the center and the decreases as a parabolic function and it is equal to zero at the pole. Next, consider the distribution of pressure in the channel A, where both the attraction and centrifugal forces act on any particle. Inasmuch as a difference of a pressure at terminal points of both channels is the same and a >, it is natural to assume that the attraction field in the channel A is smaller and suppose that the correction factor is equal to the ratio of axes, bja. Correspondingly, a condition of equilibrium is... [Pg.152]

For cases of nonuniform velocity distribution, Kays and London (1958) suggested using momentum correction and energy correction factors in the above equations. However, these factors are very difficult to evaluate, so the homogeneous model is used here. [Pg.240]

Because the amounts and density of these transporters vary along the gastrointestinal tract, it is necessary to introduce a correction factor for the varying transport rates in the different luminal and enterocyte compartments. Due to the lack of experimental data for the regional distribution, and Michaelis-Menten constants for each drug in Table 18.2, we fitted an intrinsic (concentration-independent) transport rate for each drug to closely approximate the experimental %HIA. This... [Pg.435]

Fig. 7.7. Effects of Poisson photon noise on calculated SE and FRET values. (A) Statistical distribution of number of incoming photons for the mean fluorescence intensities of 5,10, 20, 50, and 100 photons/pixel, respectively. For n = 100 (rightmost curve), the SD is 10 thus the relative coefficient of variation (RCV this is SD/mean) is 10 %. In this case, 95% of observations are between 80 and 120. For example, n — 10 the RCY has increased to 33%. (B) To visualize the spread in s.e. caused by the Poisson distribution of pixel intensities that averaged 100 photons for each A, D, and S (right-most curve), s.e. was calculated repeatedly using a Monte Carlo simulation approach. Realistic correction factors were used (a = 0.0023,/ = 0.59, y = 0.15, <5 = 0.0015) that determine 25% FRET efficiency. Note that spread in s.e. based on a population of pixels with RCY = 10 % amounts to RCV = 60 % for these particular settings Other curves for photon counts decreasing as in (A), the uncertainty further grows and an increasing fraction of calculated s.e. values are actually below zero. (C) Spread in Ed values for photon counts as in (A). Note that whereas the value of the mean remains the same, the spread (RCV) increases to several hundred percent. (D) Spread depends not only on photon counts but also on values of the correction... Fig. 7.7. Effects of Poisson photon noise on calculated SE and FRET values. (A) Statistical distribution of number of incoming photons for the mean fluorescence intensities of 5,10, 20, 50, and 100 photons/pixel, respectively. For n = 100 (rightmost curve), the SD is 10 thus the relative coefficient of variation (RCV this is SD/mean) is 10 %. In this case, 95% of observations are between 80 and 120. For example, n — 10 the RCY has increased to 33%. (B) To visualize the spread in s.e. caused by the Poisson distribution of pixel intensities that averaged 100 photons for each A, D, and S (right-most curve), s.e. was calculated repeatedly using a Monte Carlo simulation approach. Realistic correction factors were used (a = 0.0023,/ = 0.59, y = 0.15, <5 = 0.0015) that determine 25% FRET efficiency. Note that spread in s.e. based on a population of pixels with RCY = 10 % amounts to RCV = 60 % for these particular settings Other curves for photon counts decreasing as in (A), the uncertainty further grows and an increasing fraction of calculated s.e. values are actually below zero. (C) Spread in Ed values for photon counts as in (A). Note that whereas the value of the mean remains the same, the spread (RCV) increases to several hundred percent. (D) Spread depends not only on photon counts but also on values of the correction...
We assume that the chains were oriented parallel to the film plane but the chain direction were distributed randomly in the film plane. In this case, the correction factor for the chain orientation, , is 3/8. Consequently, the xSx value of the PTV cast film was calculated to be 1.2 x 10 9 esu, which is comparable to that of the highly oriented vacuum-deposited polydiacetylene film at the resonance with the exciton absorption. [Pg.323]

Craig H (1957) Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass spectro-metric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 12 133-149 DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42 495-506... [Pg.212]

If a 1-g soil sample is extracted with 10 mL of extractant, then the component extracted is evenly distributed throughout the lOmL. This means the final result will need to be multiplied by 10 because the component was diluted 1 10 (this assumes an extractant density of lg/mL). This then is related back to the volume or mass of soil in the original sample, or it may be directly related back to the field. It may also be necessary to apply other conversion or correction factors, such as the percent water present in the original soil sample, depending on the procedure used. [Pg.313]

For steady flow in a pipe or tube the kinetic energy term can be written as m2/(2 a) where u is the volumetric average velocity in the pipe or tube and a is a dimensionless correction factor which accounts for the velocity distribution across the pipe or tube. Fluids that are treated as compressible are almost always in turbulent flow and a is approximately 1 for turbulent flow. Thus for a compressible fluid flowing in a pipe or tube, equation 6.4 can be written as... [Pg.190]

If one is interested in spectroscopy involving only the ground Born Oppenheimer surface of the liquid (which would correspond to IR and far-IR spectra), the simplest approximation involves replacing the quantum TCF by its classical counterpart. Thus pp becomes a classical variable, the trace becomes a phase-space integral, and the density operator becomes the phase-space distribution function. For light frequency co with ho > kT, this classical approximation will lead to substantial errors, and so it is important to multiply the result by a quantum correction factor the usual choice for this application is the harmonic quantum correction factor [79 84]. Thus we have... [Pg.63]


See other pages where Distribution correction factor is mentioned: [Pg.848]    [Pg.1495]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.1437]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.212]   


SEARCH



Correction factors

Distribution factors

Kinetic distribution correction factor

© 2024 chempedia.info