Distinguishing reaction mechanisms

The same rate expression can be derived from various reaction mechanisms, so the reaction mechanism cannot be decided exclusively by fitting kinetic data with different kinetic equations despite that the kinetic data have no experimental errors. Therefore, the reflection between rate expression and mechanism is one-way, namely the rate expression can be derived from the reaction mechanism, while the mechanism cannot be confirmed by the rate expression. This one-way situation makes the study of chemical kinetics incomplete, only focusing on measurement of the reaction rate. It also needs to deal with the collection of spectroscopy and other data to obtain information about the nature of adsorption intermediates and important elementary steps in reaction mechanisms. That is to say, other experimental evidences are demanded in order to obtain a reaction mechanism. 

The methods for distinguishing reaction mechanisms derived from rate expression include pressure test, transient-response, equivalent two-step principles and stoichiometric number and so on. The detail of the former three methods can be seen in the literature. Here we only introduce stoichiometric number method that is very effective for deciding which step is rate determining step. In particular, it played a very important role in the kinetic study of ammonia sjmthesis reactions. 

Stoichiometric number, a, is the number of times an elementary step may repeat, after an overall reaction in the series of elementary reactions sequence. 

For a reversible reaction, it is difficult to obtain the rate equation of reverse reaction from that of forward reaction according to thermodjmamic conditions, if the reaction mechanism is unknown. It is known from chemical equilibrium that  

For the same reaction, equilibrium expressions (2.49) and (2.50) are equivalent, but the equilibrium constant and the reaction heat are different. The same situation falls across for the ascertaining of activation energy from the heat effect of reaction Q = - /. 

---

Annular tautomerism does not occur in isothiazoles or benzisothiazoles. Substituent tautomers can sometimes be distinguished by chemical methods, but it is important that reaction mechanisms and the relative rates of interconversion of tautomeric starting materials or isomeric reaction products are carefully investigated. Physical methods only will be considered in this section, and references to original publications can be found in a comprehensive review (76AHC(S1)1). 

The mechanism proposed for the production of radicals from the N,N-dimethylaniline/BPO couple179,1 involves reaction of the aniline with BPO by a Sn-2 mechanism to produce an intermediate (44). This thermally decomposes to benzoyloxy radicals and an amine radical cation (46) both of which might, in principle, initiate polymerization (Scheme 3.29). Pryor and Hendrikson181 were able to distinguish this mechanism from a process involving single electron transfer through a study of the kinetic isotope effect. 

The chemical properties of oxide surfaces have been studied by several methods, including oxygen exchange. This method has been used to investigate the mechanisms of heterogeneous reactions for which oxides are active catalysts [36]. The dimerization step does not necessarily precede desorption and Malinin and Tolmachev [634], in one of the few reviews of decomposition kinetics of solid metal oxides, use this criterion to distinguish two alternative reaction mechanisms, examples being... 

The distinguishing features of this reaction mechanism are the following ... 

The study of reaction mechanisms can be a subtle business but in fact the mechanistic basis of classification into step and chain processes arises from major differences in the two types of process. There is no doubt about the nature of the reaction in almost all cases as can be seen by considering the distinguishing features of the two mechanisms which are summarised below. 

A good model is consistent with physical phenomena (i.e., 01 has a physically plausible form) and reduces crresidual to experimental error using as few adjustable parameters as possible. There is a philosophical principle known as Occam s razor that is particularly appropriate to statistical data analysis when two theories can explain the data, the simpler theory is preferred. In complex reactions, particularly heterogeneous reactions, several models may fit the data equally well. As seen in Section 5.1 on the various forms of Arrhenius temperature dependence, it is usually impossible to distinguish between mechanisms based on goodness of fit. The choice of the simplest form of Arrhenius behavior (m = 0) is based on Occam s razor. 

For either of the ternary complex mechanisms described above, titration of one substrate at several fixed concentrations of the second substrate yields a pattern of intersecting lines when presented as a double reciprocal plot. Hence, without knowing the mechanism from prior studies, one can not distinguish between the two ternary complex mechanisms presented here on the basis of substrate titrations alone. In contrast, the data for a double-displacement reaction yields a series of parallel lines in the double reciprocal plot (Figure 2.15). Hence it is often easy to distinguish a double-displacement mechanism from a ternary complex mechanism in this way. Also it is often possible to run the first half of the reaction in the absence of the second substrate. Formation of the first product is then evidence in favor of a doubledisplacement mechanism (however, some caution must be exercised here, because other mechanistic explanations for such data can be invoked see Segel, 1975, for more information). For some double-displacement mechanisms the intermediate E-X complex is sufficiently stable to be isolated and identified by chemical and/or mass spectroscopic methods. In these favorable cases the identification of such a covalent E-X intermediate is verification of the reaction mechanism. 

In this chapter we described the thermodynamics of enzyme-inhibitor interactions and defined three potential modes of reversible binding of inhibitors to enzyme molecules. Competitive inhibitors bind to the free enzyme form in direct competition with substrate molecules. Noncompetitive inhibitors bind to both the free enzyme and to the ES complex or subsequent enzyme forms that are populated during catalysis. Uncompetitive inhibitors bind exclusively to the ES complex or to subsequent enzyme forms. We saw that one can distinguish among these inhibition modes by their effects on the apparent values of the steady state kinetic parameters Umax, Km, and VmdX/KM. We further saw that for bisubstrate reactions, the inhibition modality depends on the reaction mechanism used by the enzyme. Finally, we described how one may use the dissociation constant for inhibition (Kh o.K or both) to best evaluate the relative affinity of different inhibitors for ones target enzyme, and thus drive compound optimization through medicinal chemistry efforts. 

An understanding of kinetic acidity is necessary in order to distinguish such mechanisms from other ways in which hydrogen may become attached to a substrate, e.g., hydrogen atom transfer, reaction 8, and hydride transfer, reaction 9. 

The exponent n is Unked to the munber of steps in the formation of a nucleus (this is a zone in the soUd matrix at which the reaction occurs), ft, and the number of dimensions in which the nuclei grow, X. It can be difficult to distinguish ft and X without independent evidence, and ft can fall to zero following the consumption of external nuclei sites. Hulbert has analysed the possible values of the exponent, n, for a variety of conditions of instantaneous (/3 = 0), constant (ft = 1) and deceleratory (0 < /I < 1) nucleation and for growth in one, two and three dimensions (X = 1 - 3) [ 17]. He also considered the effects of a diffusion contribution to the reaction rate. This reduces the importance of the acceleratory process and reduces the value of n. For diffusion controlled processes, n = ft + Xjl, whereas for a phase boimdary controlled process n = ft + X. Possible values of n are summarised in Table 1. Interpretation of these values can be difficult, and a given value does not unequivocally allow the determination of the reaction mechanism. 

With respect to enzymes having three or more products in the enzyme-catalyzed reaction, it is also possible to vary the concentration of two products (while keeping their ratio at a constant value) at the same time. If the rate expression for one reaction scheme has terms containing both those products, potentially that scheme can be distinguished from alternative reaction mechanisms that don t have those same terms in the rate expression. 

Even if we have reliable data for the overall reaction rate over a large range of reaction conditions we may be unable to distinguish between two different reaction mechanisms. 

The change from a stepwise preassociation mechanism through a triple ion intermediate to an uncoupled concerted reaction occurs as the triple ion becomes too unstable to exist in an energy well for the time of a bond vibration ( 10 s). The borderline between these two reaction mechanisms is poorly marked, and there are no clear experimental protocols for its detection. These two reaction mechanisms cannot be distinguished by experiments designed to characterize their transition states, which lie at essentially the same position in the inner upper right hand corner of Figure 2.3. Only low yields of the nucleophilic substitution product are obtained from both stepwise preassociation and uncoupled concerted reactions, because for formation of the preassociation complex in water is small... 

---